AutoXRacer
Member
Biggest misnomer about the S2000 ever. You obviously haven't driven a 2004+ with the 2.2L. My S2k was faster than my '99 Miata everywhere in the RPM band. Face it, the Miata is SLOW without spending money on aftermarket FI. I mean it's a 16 second 1/4 car, whereas the S2000 is a 14 second car. That's a huge difference in acceleration. I drove my S2k as a daily driver for almost 4 years and it was never a burden to drive because of lack of torque. I've got video of me accelerating through a few gears in my S2k. I'll have to post'm to Youtube. You will tailor your driving to the car. If you're used to shifting at 3k RPM, it's not going to work in the S2k. With a 8,200 RPM redline, it's very common to shift around 4-5k and the motor doesn't even sound like it's phased by it. That's what it was built for. Hand built, by the way. How many motors and cars today can you say are hand assembled? The S2000 is. Don't get me wrong, the Miata is a great car, but I used to see the same arguement over at Miata.net when I owned mine about the S2000 vs. Miata. That pissing match seemed to come up every other day and people would throw out BS about the S2000 being torqueless and hard to drive around town. This was coming from people who's Miata had like 110lb-ft of torque. Then the ones who had owned both came in and raise the BS flag.
I've had S2K owners tell me it was annoying to drive the S2K...maybe it was the pre2004 owners. But like I said, an FI Miata will be a lot more fun to drive...
What's an S2K numbers? 200HP and 140 ft-lbs at the wheels? My modded NA 99 Miata had 150 HP and 135 ft-lbs, S2K weren't that much faster... I used to pull of of the hole...
Anyway, this is not a Miata vs. S2K war... These are just my personal experience with both cars.
Just for pooning's sake...don't get a Miata; I still get gay jokes for being an ex-Miata owner... Actually, I still get them for owning a Mazda... (lol2)
Last edited: