If it was a dealer install make sure your paper work says so !!! And when you get the car running DO NOT install the CAI again. A turbo car does not need a CAI, that is what the intercooler is for.
Where is this stuff coming from? High water is a covered loss. It does not matter whether the intake was installed by the dealer. What matters is that the vehicle was exposed to a peril covered under the policy and sustained damage.
The device that connects the air filter to the maf housing, whether it is a CAI or SRI or the stock air box (what we call the "intake") has absolutely a totally different function than the intercooler. These free flowing aftermarket "intakes" provide a greater volume and mass of air to the engine than the stock air box.
The intercooler is on the opposite, hot, boosted, outlet side of the turbo compressor and serves to cool down the air charge after it has been compressed (boost) and heated up considerably. Boosted air=heated air. The intercooler cools it down a good bit before it enters the intake manifold. Hot air has fewer molecules of oxygen than colder air, so cooling it back down makes more power.
And Road and Track was totally wrong in concluding after conducting before and after dyno tests that the MSCAI produced a 24 whp and 28 pound torque gains from this "not needed" CAI? I don't think so.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/l...zda_mazdaspeed3/2007_mazda_mazdaspeed3_page_2
Sorry to be so harsh, but man, please, where does this stuff come from?
Last edited: