Ever heard of a wankel supercharger?

peepsalot

Member
Contributor
:
Black 03 MSP
I was researching supercharer designs just a minute ago and saw this.
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/0107scc_garage/
At the bottom it talks about how wankels were used at some point for supercharging. I wonder why it didn't catch on. I wonder if an rx-7 engine could be modified to work as a compressor. That would be too cool to have an rx-7 engine fed by an rx-7 engine-supercharger. It's possible, right?
 
probably has a lot to do with sheer weight, cost and size....hell my simple supercharger is almost 1' X 1' and it's hard enough to package properly!
 
Well, any type of internal combustion engine is by design a compressor. The wankle idea is interesting but overly complex, and As Mr. Matty-Womp said, difficult to package.
 
actually the wankel engine contains FAR fewer parts than a typical ic 4-stroke engine (Otto engine) so mechanically, it's not complex at all. the reason why the wankel costs as much as a 4-stroke engine is the manufacturing process required to create slightly complex epitrochoidal engine housing and the shape of the rotor itself.

i never knew they were used as a supercharger....interesting
 
i am sure you could make a small miniture single rotar superchager with it, but it would take wayy to much time and money to design it, us the the power of womp instead..
 
Actually the retractable seat belts on new VW's are wankel designed. They use mini pyro. devices to fire them.
 
What would the thermal efficiencies of a wankel supercharger be like?

What limits the rpm limit of a rotary? Anyone think a wankel supercharger could run at 3x speed of the rest of the engine?
 
i would have to look into this further but any sort of combustion happening within a wankle engine would create extremely high exhaust temps and aren't they using the exhaust pulses to feed the primary engine?? seems very counterproductive.
 
the efficiency of a wankel engine isn't much greater than a regular 4-stroke.....about 35% efficient. the real advantage of the rotary engine is its high power density. that's why the engines are small but can still make the same power as engines with higher displacement.
 
I can't imagine a wankle supercharger being more efficient or easier to spool than a regular gear-stepped centrifugal supercharger. Mine actually spins at 3.05 for every one revolution of the blower pulley.
 
Striker187 said:
actually the wankel engine contains FAR fewer parts than a typical ic 4-stroke engine (Otto engine) so mechanically, it's not complex at all. the reason why the wankel costs as much as a 4-stroke engine is the manufacturing process required to create slightly complex epitrochoidal engine housing and the shape of the rotor itself.

i never knew they were used as a supercharger....interesting
I meant overly complex as a supercharger.
 
anyone remember the pictures of wankle rotors less than the size of your fingertip? there was some experimentation with them as a sort of fuel driven electrical powersource
 
uclap5 said:
anyone remember the pictures of wankle rotors less than the size of your fingertip? there was some experimentation with them as a sort of fuel driven electrical powersource
You mean this?
 

New Threads

Back