What's next for the CX-5?

Someone needs to get a picture of the rear suspension so that we can see if they have gone to Torsion Beam with the CX-5.
I scoped out this image and you can see control arms for the rear end.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9688.webp
    IMG_9688.webp
    72.5 KB · Views: 84
The ZF8 won’t fit into the CX-5 engine bay, it’s a longitudinal transmission. The best we can hope for is Toyota’s DAT from the new auto GR Corolla.
 
Mazda, Will be very careful on the new 2026 CX5. It is their #1 selling vehicle. I personally love the looks of the 2025 CX5 and just traded our 21 CX5 for a 25 CX5 Turbo Premium.

We looked at the CX50 and passed.

I think the front end on the 50, 70 & 90 could make it's way to the CX5.

I think the interior changes on the 50 will make it's way to the CX5.

I believe Mazda will continue with the 2.5 motor and keep the transmission because it just works.

I think they will keep the 19 inch wheels. Handling is important but ride quality will be very important.

We honestly traded our 2021 CX5 GTR for our 2025 CX5 Turbo Premium because we know this is the last year of this generation and we really like most everything about it.

I am looking forward to see what Mazda does to their flagship and #1 selling vehicle.
 
About the new in-house hybrid, here is some useful info from Best Car Japan website.
Translate the entire page if you prefer English.

 
Promising to read the one post which said it would be about 5" longer. I would like it to be ~189" and have a larger backseat. The rear seat legroom is one of the CX-5's downfalls. If they can get the new 8-sp into it and keep top power at 250hp or higher they will have a winner.
 
Promising to read the one post which said it would be about 5" longer. I would like it to be ~189" and have a larger backseat. The rear seat legroom is one of the CX-5's downfalls. If they can get the new 8-sp into it and keep top power at 250hp or higher they will have a winner.
I agree with you; hopefully an 8 speed would not only provide better fuel economy but could also lower the RPM on the highway giving a quieter ride.

I have a 2020 Canadian GS which is similar to the US Touring so only one trim up from base but I find it has many neat features! It will be interesting to see what improvements and new goodies it will have but also what features will Mazda remove if any? I particularly like the 40/20/40 seat back with remote handles, carpeted side cargo area, reclining rear seat albeit only two position, acoustic glass, 2 rear seat pockets (many vehicles have only one), height adjustable passenger seat, heated wipers with additional heater near driver's side A pillar, 3 level heated seats, triple door seals, extended lower door trim keeps door sill clean. This is the kind of refinement the competition doesn't have.

Is there room for improvement? Of course and it has been discussed at length so we'll see what happens. For me here's my wish list; bigger door pockets, glove box and console, more room between gas pedal and console, bigger cargo under floor storage, back up camera with predictive lines, foot activated power hatch, key fob with larger buttons and remote start, better soundproofing, larger front seats, more heat from heated steering wheel, J hook wipers, eco/normal/sport transmission modes. I know I'm asking a lot...🤭

I don't need a panoramic sunroof or downhill descent control but that would be nice for those who want it.
 
Someone thinks the CX-5 is going double digit…

 
Japanese knows better not to use "4" in model names.
That is not unique to Chinese.
(pronunciation wise, "4" is close to "die/dead" in Chinese)

Japanese have two ways to pronounces "4".
Kyoto = "si" similar to how Chinese pronounce it. Influenced by Chinese from Tang dynasty (600-900AC).
Tokyo = "yong" (ancient Japanese pronunciation)

Similarly for "7"
Kyoto = "si-chi" (yes, "si" again)
Tokyo = "na-na".
Tokyo people dislikes "si". They go back to their own ancient pronunciation, instead of what they learned from Chinese/Tang.

Mr. Bhindi is in charge of Australia. I am not surprised.
Eastern Asians dislike "4" more than western people dislike "13"... much more.

I believe Mazda will keep using the name, CX-5.
Why mess with success?
 
Last edited:
Japanese knows better not to use "4" in model names.
That is not unique to Chinese.
(pronunciation wise, "4" is close to "die/dead" in Chinese)

Japanese have two ways to pronounces "4".
Kyoto = "si" similar to how Chinese pronounce it. Influenced by Chinese from Tang dynasty (600-900AC).
Tokyo = "yong" (ancient Japanese pronunciation)

Similarly for "7"
Kyoto = "si-chi" (yes, "si" again)
Tokyo = "na-na".
Tokyo people dislikes "si". They go back to their own ancient pronunciation, instead of what they learned from Chinese/Tang.

Mr. Bhindi is in charge of Australia. I am not surprised.
Eastern Asians dislike "4" more than western people dislike "13"... much more.

I believe Mazda will keep using the name, CX-5.
Why mess with success?
Based on this I would say they don't care about using "4" in the nomenclature....

"The Mazda CX-4 is a compact crossover SUV that was introduced in 2016 and is currently only sold in China. It is positioned above the Mazda CX-3 and below the Mazda CX-5. The CX-4 has a sloping roofline that gives it a coupe-like appearance, while its dimensions are similar to those of the CX-5."
 

New Threads

Back