twiztedjeckel said:who gives 2 s**** how much you have into your car? $100 says the guy that lays down $275k on a Murcialago didn't need to spend a dime on his car to make yours look like a b****.
but don't get me wrong. i have a strong love for the RX-7,well any rotary powered vehicle for that matter. i've owned one myself. they can be very lethal machines if put together correctly and small issues worked out in them.
markeddy-btw----let Saleen,Roush or Doug Rippie do whatever they can to a camero or mustang. they're front heavy muscle cars that live to oversteer. .95g's on a skid pad's impressive but whats more impressive is the 1G that the R1 model 93 RX-7 pulled stock straight off the assembly line. can you say "who's ya daddy?" oh by the way, there's a reason the 3rd gen 7 was referred to as Ferrari killer(chair)
I happen to think the Twin Turbo RX-7 was a TITS car!!! I knew a friend that had a heavily modified one that ran 11's all day long. He spent about 15k to the already BIG $$$ price of 30k+ to do that.
Actually the new Corvette Z06 will pound close to 1G on the skidpad. The RX-7 in it's day was a beast on the road granted were talking about the R1 of course. The other thing to remeber is the RX-7 back then with the TT setup was a 2800 lb. car or less, had a shorter wheel base, better center of gravity, etc. because of it's small frame.
My other point was that the RX-7 back then was made for a simple reason....to answer the call to make something comparable or in this case BETTER to alot of cars in it's day and TODAY to what American muscle had back then and now.
You can thank Detroit for pushing the IMPORT demand for performance up to where it is today....all I was asking is that you give credit where credit is due like I have done with the RX-7 and other imports.
Last edited: