BinaryRotary said:Actually 4WD is different because its not operating all the time. AWD is constant, or has no means to be engaged On or Off by the driver.
So like I said, 4WD =! AWD.
BinaryRotary said:Actually 4WD is different because its not operating all the time. AWD is constant, or has no means to be engaged On or Off by the driver.
pluto316 said:So like I said, 4WD =! AWD.
Metal MP5 said:i would love to make my P5 an AWD car. i don't care bout all the performance crap because everybody says different things, like this one is better for this and that one sucks for that, blablablaa
Before throwing s*** at the guy for wanting to do something cool with his car, did any of you ask him actually why he wants to do it ? I didn't see Droozor or pluto mention they wanted to own everybody in the 1/4 or do rally with their cars. So why insisting on the "fact" it doesn't launch good (i don't know) or that the suspension sucks for rallying ? I would LOVE to have AWD and you know why ? I love driving in the snow and AWD would make it soooo much better. And everytime someone says he wants to convert his car to AWD or dreams of reaching 300whp, there's ALWAYS someone saying "you shouild've bought a WRX" or STi or EVO or whatever car you can think of that has that power, while the guy wants to take the car he loves and bring it there. To me, an EVO aint nothing more than a regular Lancer that was modified. Actually, i think buying an EVO or STi is just taking the easy way out. Although i love those cars, i would admire more someone who would take a regular car and build it to compete against those 2 than buying it already done. Kinda like my friend who makes fun of me cause he beats my ass all the time with his M3 ... it just shows he has more money than i do.
Anyway, i'd love to see (and own) an AWD protege because of snow driving and stuff, and also because my car would be unique ... isn't that what most people are trying to do anyway?
(edit: fixed some horrible typos)
BinaryRotary said:Okay, call me retarded, but I don't get it!!
KpaBap said:He's trying to look intelligent and use programming syntax
In C++, the symbol != stands for (not equal to)
So what he's trying to say was that AWD is not the same as 4WD.
Instead, what he really said was that AWD is equal to NOT 4WD.
So I take it, the Sport20 has a low/high and on/off switch for the 4WD?
Or maybe no low range...
That would make a drivetrain swap even more pointless.
KpaBap said:So let me get this straight, you'd spend thousands of dollars and hundreds of man hours in trying to make the MSP AWD, or you can just buy a used WRX for ~$17k which will already have AWD, a better motor, more hp & tq, and will be built in a factory which has been building AWD cars for decades (rather than in your garage).
It's a nice idea but Subaru already beat you to it, and for cheaper.
chino said:I have an idea! Why don't we try to get every thread to degenerate into a MSP/P5 Vs. STi/EVO debate?
STFU
pluto316 said:Oh, and it's been bugging me kids.. The Sport20 is 4WD.
AWD =! 4WD
KpaBap said:Good luck getting the FS motor to make 250+ ALL-WHEEL horsepower.
Why WOULD I want a better motor, better drivetrain and better everything?
What could I possibly be thinking?
Metal MP5 said:so why insisting that the suspension sucks for rallying ?
TooleBox said:ok...
lets run with this...
Vulcanon said:that's not exactly true brian, mazda makes amazingly powerful cars right off the bat...just none of them ever make it to the USA
TooleBox said:will it ever happen? unfortunately, NO. with Mazda being a "Ford Family" car, they will never create a "compact" car that will dominate their "muscle" car. Ford will NEVER bring the Focus RS to the US as it would destroy their Cobra project.