8.47 @ 168.7!!!!!

travisto

Member
:
titanium 04' MSM
(hump) Not my MSP. (hippy) My 04' Ducati 999R! (hump) Haven't even broke into the 12's with my MSP because of the GOD DAMN FUEL CUT! (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup)
 
travisto said:
(hump) Not my MSP. (hippy) My 04' Ducati 999R! (hump) Haven't even broke into the 12's with my MSP because of the GOD DAMN FUEL CUT! (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup) (pullup)


(fu) (fu) PS: **** A BUSA!!!!! (fu) (fu) 184 RWHP OH and it's a twin so add a 117 lbs./ft. of rw torque to that
 
is the ducatti really faster than the busa?
just something id like to know i mean the busa is the fastest mass produced bikes number 10 on TLC fastest machines on earth
 
trippertripp said:
is the ducatti really faster than the busa?
just something id like to know i mean the busa is the fastest mass produced bikes number 10 on TLC fastest machines on earth

Was the fastest. Now the 05' Ninja (1200) is supposedly the fastest. But mine is by far the quickest( 0-60 and qtr mile) mine only tops out at around 211 mph though....ONLY!? (band2) If I had another gear i swear this thing would do 250! i HAVE ABOUT 10 MORE HORSE THAN BOTH AND ABOUT 20 MORE LB./FT. OF TORQUE. Not bad for a 2 BANGER (bike)
 
Last edited:
hmmm a ninja thats intresting i still think the busa is the sexiest though and its cheaper then a duccati as well but im thinking ahead ill have a bike sooner or later not the best vehicle while your still in highschool though so ill have to wait another year and plus i though a busa could go 220mph and im pretty sure that was stock cause suzuki named the bike after a japanese bird that can fly that fast in a dive of course again just wondering
 
holy s***, is that thing stock??? Fastest Ive ever seen a stock bike run(of course it was a busa) was 9.3
 
trippertripp said:
hmmm a ninja thats intresting i still think the busa is the sexiest though and its cheaper then a duccati as well but im thinking ahead ill have a bike sooner or later not the best vehicle while your still in highschool though so ill have to wait another year and plus i though a busa could go 220mph and im pretty sure that was stock cause suzuki named the bike after a japanese bird that can fly that fast in a dive of course again just wondering

tHE BALTESE fAlCON... AND YES IT CAN DO ALMOST 230 STOCK.(SO CAN THE FALCON!) tHATS WHY IT WAS THE FASTEST(TOP END) BUT MINE IS QUICKER. (ET 0-60 AND QTR.) tHE REASON BEING i HAVE MUCH MOR TORQUE HAVING A TWIN, AND MY BIKE IS AMAZINGLY 125LBS. LIGHTER (375 LBS. TO A BUSA'S 500. BY THE WAY IV'E BEEN RIDING FOR ABOUT 20 YEARS AND i'M 28 YEARS OLD. dO NOT EVER UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF EVEN A 600 CC BIKE. 600'S RUNLOW 11'S TO MID 10'S. ONE TWITCH AND YOU ARE DEAD. i STARTED ON A 75 CC AND DIDN'T BREAK A 100 FOR MY FIRST 10 YEARS RIDING. (no) dON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT A CROTCH ROCKET AS YOUR FIRST BIKE i DON'T CARE HOW MANY OF YOUR FRIENDS BIKES YOU'VE RODE...pLEASE RIDE SAFE.
 
Last edited:
protegeV said:
holy s***, is that thing stock??? Fastest Ive ever seen a stock bike run(of course it was a busa) was 9.3
bone stock, the 999r AKA (the SATAN slayer) is an $18,000 Superbike! (naughty) It's built for the soul pupose of racing, unlike a Busa which is built for straight line top end runs. a busa is actually designed so that it rides smoother and with less wind resistance at 200 mph than at 70! it is an amazing machine, don't get me wrong.
 
Last edited:
yeah i wana see a slip also, come on now a stk bike that runs 8's in the quarter? dont think so, i have been riding bikes since i was old enough to walk, v-twin is not even close to inline 4 unless u have a top-fuel nitro harley!!!!
 
b.s.

travisto said:
Was the fastest. Now the 05' Ninja (1200) is supposedly the fastest. But mine is by far the quickest( 0-60 and qtr mile) mine only tops out at around 211 mph though....ONLY!? (band2) If I had another gear i swear this thing would do 250! i HAVE ABOUT 10 MORE HORSE THAN BOTH AND ABOUT 20 MORE LB./FT. OF TORQUE. Not bad for a 2 BANGER (bike)


also 10 more hp and what maybe 20 30 lbs of torque more is going to drop u in to mid 8's in the quater? i see it was late when u wrote this!!!! lol maybe u was stoned? no way in the world would a stock bike with a stock length swing arm will go 8's in the quater. it takes 350whp to run in the high 7's in the quater on a bike. and a bike like ures isnt even made for straight line racing. its one of the most refined handling bike made period.
 
First off, if i could afford a 999R i'd have enough money to buy a porsche, not an MSP, relativly speaking. Second, who the **** drags a purpose built track bike. Third, here's some specs on a stock 2004 Ducati 999R http://www.rosenaupowersports.net/n...45X10K26K2004J9I37I05JAMQ686R0&veh=9456&go=Go
humm? 139 HP at a weight of 439, you're a little off cool guy. People are funny they hear Ducati and think; fastest bikes eva, even with the 620 monsters. Ducati's are fast, but there real potential is on the track, and i dont mean drag strip.
 
And the fuel cut is stopping you from 12s in the MSP? (lol2)

You're mods are........

If you think you can pull 12s in this car then the fuel cut would be the least of your worries at this point. Traction maybe?
 
yea I'm gonna wanna see slips...my brother is a certified ducati tech at the dealership here in tampa and he said bs on that one, as did the 3 other techs...they actually had 3 sittin in the showroom and theres no way if it was stock that it ran that...I've actually ridden the 999r and I can tell you for a fact you'd never be able to keep the front end down on a stock arm...you cant even gun it in 1,2 or 3 with out the front end going over...
 
Back