@ David Paul
You can stop the hatch easily with one hand so don*t know what happened with yours.
It has *pinch protection* if the door is stopped or resisted.
Thanks for the link. It's appreciated when you share documentation.
Looks like a tough design challenge for a sensing system for preventing excessive force while opening, especially if its applied near the pivot point as in this failure - which I agree with the OP sounds like a design problem. OP was using the feature as intended and had no outward indication that attempting to open the hatch would cause a problem. Even if there were visible ice on the outside of the hatch, I'd expect some sort of fail-safe, or at least some help from Mazda on the repair.
If the design and reliability folks at Mazda didn't take into account the possibility of something obstructing the opening near the hinge, I can see how it would lead to this outcome.
If the Auto-Reverse door sensing engages when say, 30 lbs extra force is applied at 30 inches from the hinge, that same resistance is equivalent to 300 lbs of force at 3 inches from the hinge due to the mechanical advantage of the moment applied to the lever arm.
I suppose it could also have a time, or rate of travel base shut-off. Unfortunately, to begin its motion from closed, it probably needs to be allowed to use enough torque to break free of surface icing and such for which there is probably a huge variation in conditions it needs to overcome. A very small resistance at the very bottom of the door, furthest from the hinge, will take a bunch of torque to overcome and might appear very similar to the servo as a very large resistance (like ice) near the hinge.
The bottom line is, if the frozen-water-near-the-hinge case was one that Mazda considered during development, they are clever enough to have implemented a fix, or at least a fail safe. If they decided it was too expensive to fix, they should have at least issued some messaging to customers to be aware that this was their responsibility. Failing that, I see no conscionable argument supporting Mazda's refusal to do the repairs on their dime.
Last edited: