FMOS Racing
Member
- :
- 2008 MS3, plus a pickup and a beater car
I could launch into all the math of why the SAE correction factor is inappropriate for a car with a turbo and a wastegate but I think the last time through just kind of bored people so I won't bother. Instead of that, here are what some other notables have to say about the topic...
From a SCC article titled, "How to: LIE With a Dyno"-
And from an article titled, "Dynos Don't Lie. Or Do They?" by Shiv S. Pathak of Vishnu Performance Systems
In short, the wastegate controls the manifold pressure on a turbo car more than ambient conditions do and the SAE correction factor is highly optimistic. Beyond the wastegate, the ratio of the change of pressure is different as well (2 psi at 14.7 psia is a different percentage than 2 psi at 34.7 psia).
From a SCC article titled, "How to: LIE With a Dyno"-
Corrected numbers, on the other hand, can be suspect in certain cases as well. Turbocharged cars running at high altitude, for example, might be more accurately represented by uncorrected numbers...
The SAE correction factor used by Dynojet assumes that lower air pressure at the sensor box means lower air pressure in the intake manifold, though, so at 5,000 feet the dyno is applying a 20-percent correction factor to compensate for a loss of air density that the engine never sees. This is fine if you are doing all your tests in Denver, but if you do one test in Denver and one test in New Orleans (the highest mountain in New Orleans is 12 feet above sea level) uncorrected numbers will be more accurate.
And from an article titled, "Dynos Don't Lie. Or Do They?" by Shiv S. Pathak of Vishnu Performance Systems
Altitude
For example, let's consider a dynamometer located at 5000 feet above sea level. At such elevation, most cars suffer terribly due to the lack of air density. As a result, their power outputs fall noticeably compared to identical cars that operate at or near sea level. For this reason, just about every dynamometer applies a hefty altitude correction in the magnitude of 20% (SAE correction, in this case). This means that a car that put down an actual 100 wheel hp is "corrected" up to 120 wheel hp. While this correction amount is reasonably accurate in some cases, it is notoriously optimistic in the case of turbocharged engines. In such engines, power output rarely falls as dramatically in response to air density reduction. This is due to their turbo control systems that combat air density reductions by allowing for higher boost pressures. These increased boost pressures can almost completely offset the ambient pressure reduction and make the "altitude correction" almost completely unnecessary. However, I have yet to see a high-altitude tuner come forth and not apply the positive correction factor when displaying their grossly optimistic dyno results.
In short, the wastegate controls the manifold pressure on a turbo car more than ambient conditions do and the SAE correction factor is highly optimistic. Beyond the wastegate, the ratio of the change of pressure is different as well (2 psi at 14.7 psia is a different percentage than 2 psi at 34.7 psia).
Last edited: