LinuxRacr's Haltech E6X Log..

No, it's not that, just why do we HAVE to race? Can't we all just get along?(poke)
 
Last edited:
Ok, this morning I had cold start issues. The car wouldn't start. It turned over great, but wouldn't start. So I took a look at the Fuel Air Correction map and remembered that Steve Kan had changed it a little. Well, loaded up my old map just to see if it would start (of course I made the corrections to the trigger setup 1st). I looked at what it said at temprature 8.48 Celcius, and the correction factor was 0.83. I tried again, and the car started, but died after that. Looking at my new map at the same air temp range, the correction factor was like 1.42 or something like that. So I moved the bar down to correction factor 0.93. The car started right up. In turn I adjusted all the bars for colder temps down by the same number of steps. From there on, I drove into work with some nice boost. :D
 
Last edited:
LinuxRacr said:
Ok, this morning I had cold start issues. The car wouldn't start. It turned over great, but wouldn't start. So I took a look at the Fuel Air Correction map and remembered that Steve Kan had changed it a little. Well, loaded up my old map just to see if it would start (of course I made the corrections to the trigger setup 1st). I looked at what it said at temprature 8.48 Celcius, and the correction factor was 0.83. I tried again, and the car started, but died after that. Looking at my new map at the same air temp range, the correction factor was like 1.4 or something like that. So I moved the bar down to correction factor 0.93. The car started right up. In turn I adjusted all the bars for colder temps down by the same factor. From there on, I drove into work with some nice boost. :D

That's one of the keys people have to figure out. Follow the trends and make "intelligent" adjustments and the car will start up just fine!

Glad you are rocking and rolling!
 
Captain KRM P5 said:
hey patrick, i'd like to see a copy of your map. i am guessing you will need to adjust the Fuel Air Correction bars yourself or as it gets colder/warmer you will be running very very rich

LinuxRacr said:
Ok, this morning I had cold start issues. The car wouldn't start. It turned over great, but wouldn't start. So I took a look at the Fuel Air Correction map and remembered that Steve Kan had changed it a little. Well, loaded up my old map just to see if it would start (of course I made the corrections to the trigger setup 1st). I looked at what it said at temprature 8.48 Celcius, and the correction factor was 0.83. I tried again, and the car started, but died after that. Looking at my new map at the same air temp range, the correction factor was like 1.42 or something like that. So I moved the bar down to correction factor 0.93. The car started right up. In turn I adjusted all the bars for colder temps down by the same factor. From there on, I drove into work with some nice boost. :D

hey, is there an echo in here :D j/k good work man
 
Thanks guys. The one thing that was also discussed was the air intake temprature. His belief is that it should not exceed 25 Celcius if your intercooler is good. Of course it will exceed that when you are at a stoplight, but when cruising around, the temps should not be higher. When I was boosting around this morning, and then I would start cruising, my intake air temps were at 29 C. I need to get that FMIC from Beau in.
 
LinuxRacr said:
Thanks guys. The one thing that was also discussed was the air intake temprature. His belief is that it should not exceed 25 Celcius if your intercooler is good. Of course it will exceed that when you are at a stoplight, but when cruising around, the temps should not be higher. When I was boosting around this morning, and then I would start cruising, my intake air temps were at 29 C. I need to get that FMIC from Beau in.

I think he is crazy... I've run with intake temperatures as high as 50 C PRE TURBO without issue... (probably up around 80 or 90 C by the time it hit the motor) If you have a short ram intake you will be pulling air temps as high as 130F or better (roughly 55C) without even putting it through the turbo. If you have a cold air... a 90 degree day results in an intake temp of 32 C which is assuming prefectly cold air... so frankly he is off is rocker on that one.

Now if he means increase over the intake draw temp... that I can semi understand... but again... that's only a 77 degree increase... and that's not that much... figuring out the thermodynamics of that wouldn't be that hard... but you'd be looking for a system efficiency probably up over 85% which is asking a LOT....

Other ways to cool that stuff...
 
Last edited:
LinuxRacr said:
I'm thinking he is talking about for the weather yesterday.

there are a lot of equations that govern it... he'd have to know the efficiency of your turbo the relative area of the intercooler air dam area (ignoring your actual intercooler size/exposure) the amount of heat seepage in your intake manifold, the heat conduction from you manifold/turbo assembly, and any other additional factors. Not to mention actual temp at the intake (do you have a CAI or a SRI?). But creating an a priori number like that doesn't mean much of anything... I've never heard of the guy, nor do I know anything about how experienced or what he is... I'd wager more experienced than I by a good margin... but mathematics and thermodynamics are the same regardless...

You can have the best intercooler in the world but if you are on the outer edges of your compressor map it will not save you... And if you are sucking hot air to start with.... an intercooler again will not save you.

not to mention that humidity matters as it changes the heat capacity of the air... a dry day the air WILL be hotter given all other variables equal... more humid day you'll see cooler temps.
 
He's been tuning Haltechs "too long" he has said. But I see what you are saying. Regardless, the other intercooler must go in if I want to boost higher. He had to retard the timing more than he thought he would have to.
 
LinuxRacr said:
He's been tuning Haltechs "too long" he has said. But I see what you are saying. Regardless, the other intercooler must go in if I want to boost higher. He had to retard the timing more than he thought he would have to.

cough*JandS*cough

What kind of timings are you running? If you are keeping in the 15ish range under boost you aren't really doing THAT bad... timing doesn't yield as much horsepower as one would hope unfortunately... And losing timing helps spool! But sucks for EGT's and turbo life.
 
Trust me, the J&S will be hooked back up soon enough! Probably sometime this weekend. I think I have around 20 degrees of timing under boost.
 
Then you are doing pretty good on the timing... my original tune that terry had done, would have been around 8 degrees of timing at 13 psi when it did the dyno that made 253
 
8 degrees advance? I remember after he retarded the timing some, he got around to asking my what the compression was. He was like 9.1:1 ? (scratch)
 
LinuxRacr said:
8 degrees advance? I remember after he retarded the timing some, he got around to asking my what the compression was. He was like 9.1:1 ? (scratch)

Terry was at stock compression (stock pistons/rods). So 9.1:1 I believe. He was at 8 degrees BTDC... so 8 degrees ABSOLUTE timing.
 
Tonight after work, I was driving around, and I was considerably richer than when we tuned yesterday. The temps are the same, but the air feels cooler. It still pulled hardcore!!
 
LinuxRacr said:
Tonight after work, I was driving around, and I was considerably richer than when we tuned yesterday. The temps are the same, but the air feels cooler. It still pulled hardcore!!

Then you need to adjust your air temperature maps. This is a good time to tune for cold weather.
 
LinuxRacr said:
I adjusted them a little this afternoon. Moving the bars down takes fuel away, right?

yes, moving the bars down reduces the percentage of correction to that temp range
 

New Threads and Articles

Back