A simple YAY or NAY?

shinzen said:
I will definitely accept that the music you listen to may not have as great a quality as some other recordings out there, but even with rap, techno and most rock you can tell a difference. When you go to a recording studio, all of the sampling is done at 44khz- by chopping that down you are definitely losing a lot of music. take some of your recordings down to your local high end stereo shop and put it into one of their good systems- listen to it and tell me that the aiwa headphones sound just as good- I am all over the place with the music I listen to- that's why sq is so imporrtant to me- the real problem of course is the amount of money it costs..



Man, what you need are some of those $50 BASS IN A BOX setups at WalMart and Pepboys. Talk about sound quality! WOOO!! ;)
 
yeah baby- that's what I am talking about- maybe pick up a couple of pyramid subs with the matching amps- almost guaranteed to keep your car warm in the winter with an electrical fire!
 
chuyler1 said:
NAY.

No subwoofer should need 1600 watts.

I could get the same quality from a 300 watt sub. If if SPL is what you're after, I could pump that 1600 watts into 4 subs and end up with a better system.

It is not worth the strain on your electrical system, the cost of a 1600 watt amp, and the cost of that sub IMHO.



you sir are wrong:p subwoofers that are more linear, equaling better SQ, need more power to move their "inefficient" motor. look at the W7's. it's an injustice to hit them with anything less than 750 watts. same with an A-series from ED. brahma's and XXX that use XBL2 tech need 1200+, because of their short VC, high motor strength design. the "average" consumer doesn't need much over a 300 watt sub, but audiophiles do;) there are true SQ guys running 800 watts to just their front sound stage, let alone their subs.

and damn 3 pages to say the kenwood sub is a big expensive paper weight?:rolleyes:
 
got wake? said:
you sir are wrong:p subwoofers that are more linear, equaling better SQ, need more power to move their "inefficient" motor. look at the W7's. it's an injustice to hit them with anything less than 750 watts. same with an A-series from ED. brahma's and XXX that use XBL2 tech need 1200+, because of their short VC, high motor strength design. the "average" consumer doesn't need much over a 300 watt sub, but audiophiles do;) there are true SQ guys running 800 watts to just their front sound stage, let alone their subs.

and damn 3 pages to say the kenwood sub is a big expensive paper weight?:rolleyes:

100% agreed!
 
750 != 1600

With that out of the way, my last setup had 250watts RMS per channel for my front stage...I know what high-power can do. However, the 12" sub was only getting 400watts. The midbass covered any intensity that may have been lost in the bass.

However, once you break 1000watts total output you start running into electrical current problems...I'm sure if you had an ambulance alternator in your P5 that wouldn't be a problem, but for most realistic systems it is. A capacitor does you no good if your system is sucking down more current than your alternator can generate.

I would rather spend my money on more surface area, sound deadening, and high quality components throughout the install than blow it on a 1600 watt sub, a 1600 watt amp to power it, an alternator, a capacitor, and a battery.
 
shinzen said:
yeah baby- that's what I am talking about- maybe pick up a couple of pyramid subs with the matching amps- almost guaranteed to keep your car warm in the winter with an electrical fire!


Isn't Bazooka making WATER COOLED amps now? I mean, really, WTF?!
 
You know what's funny...you just said "only" 400 watts to a sub. Really...you can generate GREAT bass on 50 watts. The whole car audio scene is falling victim to the numbers game. I used to compete with 100 watts TOTAL, and it sounded great. Heck...as I said before, I hit almost 150dB on 150watts!

Just keep it in perspective, I guess! :D
 
150dB on 100W total is pretty freakin' good. My system is only running about 500W total between the sub at ~300W and the fronts at ~120W a piece (haven't VM'd them yet to adjust). It get's pretty stinkin' loud...definitly loud enough for me.
 
chuyler1 said:
750 != 1600

With that out of the way, my last setup had 250watts RMS per channel for my front stage...I know what high-power can do. However, the 12" sub was only getting 400watts. The midbass covered any intensity that may have been lost in the bass.

However, once you break 1000watts total output you start running into electrical current problems...I'm sure if you had an ambulance alternator in your P5 that wouldn't be a problem, but for most realistic systems it is. A capacitor does you no good if your system is sucking down more current than your alternator can generate.

I would rather spend my money on more surface area, sound deadening, and high quality components throughout the install than blow it on a 1600 watt sub, a 1600 watt amp to power it, an alternator, a capacitor, and a battery.


i've been running several thousand watts through my system since day 3 of owning my 1.6L '99 with no problems:p still have stock alternator, and a $40 battery from walmart:D the red top battery i had died when the battery in the trunk ****** up from the vibration. it only lasted 2 weeks:rolleyes: no capacitor, no batcap, nothing more than an upgraded battery and proper wiring, and no problems:D

NetGuy, ever heard of mark antony amps? specifically the mk25opcm. it's a new generation of cheater amps that is rated at 25 watts into 4 ohm, USACI rated at 70 watts, but puts out over 2500 into .5 ohm, at 12.9 volts:eek: it'll do even more at 16 volts. you ran 6 subs, and what ohm load were you running, since the amp might be rated at 100 watt at 4 ohm, but can put out well over that at a lower load. especially if it was unregulated;) my old autotek 330mxi was rated at 165x2 at 4 ohm, but bridged at 1 ohm would put out over 2k watts, and that's an 8 year old amp:D and while 148 dB is impressive with low power, you did needed six 12's to achieve it. my goal is over 150 dB with a single 10;)
 
got wake,

I had experimented with different wirings at different times. At one point, I had 8 12s in my civic that were all wired parallel (showing a 0.5 ohm mono load to my PPI ProMOS 50...which was "the" cheater amp at the time). According to my math, it was probably throwing about 500 watts into the subs before it's untimely death-by-fire. I wish I could have caught pictures...but actual flames were coming from inside the amp through the little holes for the gain knobs!

Anyway, the later (and more stable) configuration with 6 12s was 2 pairs of 3 subs wired in parallel (load would be around 1.3 ohms, if I recall), so the amp was running in 1.3 ohms stereo. While I was competing with it system, I was running a Phoenix Gold ZPA 0.3 (specs HERE). It did well, but the car had some weird acoustic problems. When competing with the doors and windows shut, which was how these things were run back then, I could hit around 147-148. Open the door and it jumped past 150. With the mic in the footwell, the thing hit 157dB. Grrrr.

Anyway, hope that answers your questions.
 
gotta love good cheater amps:D mark antony doesn't publish the power, except at 12 volts into a 4 ohm load. but i know of 3 reputable people that bench tested it at over 2k watts at between 12.5 and 13 volts, depending on who tested it. the acoustics of cars is really ****** up, unless you get into an extreme vehicle, where you can control stuff better. i'm assuming you used sealed boxes? they typically are louder with the window cracked or door open.
 
Yeah, it was a sealed box...wall-type behind the seats in my CRX. Looked pretty cool :D

That was a long time ago, and as cool as I think it would be to compete in SPL again, I know it's not going to happen. I'm quite happy with my "basic" system as it sits.
 
chuyler1 said:
The CRX was a great starting point for an SPL system. Fun little cars.

in a year or so i'll be getting one for a serious stock or modified setup, but not extreme. my buddy and i are opening a shop, and he's doing one up now just for show. no real system and it won't be for drags. i keep trying to talk him into an engine swap and a turbo, though:D
 

New Threads and Articles

Back