brainbasher
Member
- :
- 2014 CX5 GT
Before and After
That's my primary concern about this mod, in addition to ride degradation. Let me throw something out there and see what the collective response is. I might be happy if I could just level this thing out by dropping the rear end a half inch or so. I think it looks dorky with it's "tail-high" stance and,in my case, the load is in the front far more than the back, so I could live with a tiny bit more negative camber back there. I know they say to never ever cut coil springs, but I'm wondering what would be the harm if someone were to cut a quarter loop (or however much it took) out of the bottom of each rear coils (seem image #4 in post #52 od this thread). in order to make the car statically level. The spring wire is what it is and that would not change so therefore the spring rate would not change nor would the ride quality. Correct? Seems like all you'd lose it half inch of suspension travel. Why would this not work? Or would it?-1.7 degrees isn't too bad, but kinda pushing it in regards to tire wire.
It will only worsen when you have any load in the back, which is likely to be common on a CUV, as people use them as people haulers and utility...
Cutting the coil would increase the spring rate. I would suspect to the point that it will decrease fatigue cycle of the shocks due to heavily increased dampening rate requirements. The slightly lowered ride height along with the slightly higher spring rates that H&R and AutoExe spring provide is as far as I would go with the factory shocks.
The spring wire is what it is and that would not change so therefore the spring rate would not change nor would the ride quality. Correct? Seems like all you'd lose it half inch of suspension travel. Why would this not work? Or would it?
First off I want to thank you for the link to the Eaton site. There's a wealth of information there, especially for someone who has little or no experience in modifying suspensions. Secondly, call me "lazy" if you want, but the value of these forums is they connect people who have different levels of expertise on different subjects. And this is pretty arcane subject matter. That said, let me ask you a couple of questions/comments that came to me reading this material:These are progressive rate springs, as with most non-racing applications. The H&R springs have a different and higher progressive spring rate compared to OE's.
Read up on spring rates and spring constants. A simple search online will do you good. It all starts with a simple spring constant equation (for all fellow engineers out there): k = d^4 G / (8 D^3 N)
Here if anyone feels lazy:
http://www.eatonsprings.com/techquestions/cuttingcoilspringscalculations.htm
1) You mention that both the OE and H&R springs are progressive. How does one know that, other than the fact that H&R advertises theirs as such? Why would Mazda use a progressive spring since they had the luxury of matching spring rates to vehicle weigh and suspension travel during the design proccess?
I've gone back and forth on this so many times I've lost count, but basically I've decided to forego the drop, at least for now. The fact that you end up with pretty substantial negative camber (especially in the rear) with no way to correct it was the dealkiller for me. I've had vehicles that chewed up tires before and I don't care to take that chance with the CX-5. I'm reserving the right to change my mind "down the road", but that's where I'm at for now. BTW: I had my windows tinted last week (35% on fronts) and am happy with the result. Never felt the need to do this on a vehicle before, but all the glass on the CX-5 tends to make it a heat-sync. Unfortunately, the shop that did the work damaged one of the outside seales when they cut the film and now they have to replace it with a new one on order from the local dealer.I'm enjoying reading everyone's input. Like just about everybody on this thread, I'm not a huge fan of the wheel gap on my new CX-5. I'm upgrading to 20's w/ 255/45 ZR20's in about 2 weeks. My windows are being dark tinted as I write this from Starbucks waiting for the job to be done lol (Unfortunately I'm one those people at the moment) And based on a little more R&D from my friends on this forum, I suspect lowering my CX-5 isn't to far away.
Thanks to those of you brave enough to install the kit and vet it because it certainly doesn't seem like the manufacturer has.
Found out the springs are on b/o with the manu :/
...and I'll offer my OEM 19's with the hard to find Toyo 225/55 19's they are wrapped with here first... I hope to sell them with less then 3k miles on them so somebody will get plenty of life out of them. If anybody else has sold there's, I'm curious to know what you sold them for. Thanks!
I've got the H&R springs. Had them on for about 12,000 kms and turns out I 'forgot' to get an alignment when I installed the springs.
I have just changed the wheels over and discovered quite bad inner tyre wear on 2 of the tyres.
Is this likely to be a result of the misalignment that can be rectified with an alignment? or a camber issue?
Is camber adjustable with the CX5?
Is camber adjusted during an alignment?