yes, i've read that thread. the part that makes my point (that, legalese fine print aside, it's there as an endorsement) are things like these:
"i think the idea is great dan, that way people who do this type of stuff don't have to get bitched at."
and what you just said:
ThrillRide said:
but if you start posting negative stuff in peoples race posts you will just get flamed.
i'll digress to others previous posts...."if you don't like it don't go in". It really is just that simple.
why will you get flamed for posting negative stuff about street racing, if the board is actually against it? if it's truly meant as a place to stick those threads so they don't gum up legitimate forums, what's the problem with people voicing their negative opinions?
is the purpose of that forum only to say how cool and fun street racing is? if so, i'll accept that you have a point, but then the conversation goes back to the true nature and appropriateness of such a forum on a board that does not endorse street racing.
if it's strictly an administrative organization tool, and not an endorsement as has been claimed, there should be no problem with people posting their negative views in threads.
do you see the logical disconnect? you can't have it both ways; either:
A) the forum is meant to legitimize street racing and people who don't agree should stay out, or
B) it's basically another version of the dumpster, and people should be free to criticize all they want (esp since they're just voicing the official policy of the board).
perosnally, i think the reality is A), and either it needs to go, or mazdaforums needs to be honest with itelf and others regarding its stance on street racing.