people hating on the reclining seats, just like hating on the power lift gate. you first gen cx5 owners are some of the most biased.
i bet if they announce android auto and apple car play standard on the 2017 but wont be upgadeable for the 2016 and below you guys would hate on that too.
come on now. reclining rear seats are very useful even if only slight adjustment. especially if you are regularly doing road trips with people in the back. and it better have reclining rear seats this year AND air vents because those are what either makes or breaks someone purchasing this or the competition. In which case the newest redesigned 2017 CRV. standard rear vents, recline rear seats, AND 2.5amp dual USB plugs in the back.
let me guess from you first gen cx5 owners--"mehhhhhh who needs air vents in the back or usb ports" and the numerous attempts on why power lift gate isn't important LOL. that was hilarious. i think many are in denial that your model that has remained unchanged for so many years will indeed be outdated and old in terms of styling and features. i mean ive read some ridiculous reasoning from you 1st gen cx5 owners. trying to find justification on why all the new features that will be appearing on the 2017 is something yall can live without. whats next, come 2018, you guys will try to persuade would be buyers of the then current cx5, to go ahead an buy the first gen cx5 2016.5 and older because who needs power lift gate, air vents, reclining rear seats, possibly android auto/apple car, play, etc? thats how some of you guys are sounding.
perhaps its many who just bought a 2016 or 2016.5 without any knowledge until recently that their brand new car will instantly be old not een a few months? it happens. but there is no sense in trying to discredit an upcoming car that is likely to be improved and better in everyway by hating on features that are or will become standardized features from here on out for mazda and practically EVERY other car maker. Oh do you refuse to upgrade your 4:3 36" picture tube tv because you swear its better than the latest hdtv smart TVs--yea drastic but you know what I'm trying to say.
The LAST time I can really think of a vehicle become inferior as it got newer was the mitsubishi eclipse. frm 90-99 it was offered in turbo, AWD, some with 4WS. then from 2000+ they just ruined that car with horrible engines and strictly being FWD. Mazda is not making that mistake.
at least you still have the argument of "it uses the same 2.5L as mine, no need to buy the new one"