I'd rather read the U.S. Geological Survey Coastal Science Monthly than to read pointless arguments on an online forum.
I believe the point I was desperately trying to get across was, "chill out a little." *^_^*
These "my car is faster than yours" threads have been around since the dawn of the car enthusiasts forums. When some of the people have used the word "fact", they were probably basing their argument on the fundamental laws of physics. While there are many factors contributing to the overall performance of a vehicle - power, weight, gearing, drag coefficiency, type of tires, the list goes on and on - given the similar conditions in a controlled environment, the outcome will be heavily based on the vehicle's power to weight ratio. That is to say that if my car weighs 3100lbs and your car weighs 3300lbs, but my car has 263HP and yours has over 330HP, given the situation your car will "always" be faster. In the world of science, when something consistently has the same outcome, it becomes a law. No one questions the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics because that's the way it always is - try having a debate with an evolutionist with that one. Therefore, if I wanted to use a strong wording such as "facts", I'd want to base it on solid laws of physics like the example I just mentioned.
Notice I wrote "a controlled" environment. If I were to race Michael Shumaker in an RSX (my last car) with my MS3 around the Nurburgring, I'd bet that he will undoubtly leave a huge gap even with the slower vehicle. No one would question that based on the light year difference in our skills. Take those same cars to a quarter mile drag race again with Mr. Shumaker. He may drive Ferrari F1 cars, but my MS3 has a much better chance of winning this one soley based on the laws of physics. Now... if I can just get him to come out and run laps around the track with me, that'd be awesome. *^_^*