Mazda is advertising CX-5 models without Cylinder Deactivation and i-stop

  • Thread starter Thread starter 190018
  • Start date Start date
My 2024 Signature is the same way. No deactivation. It was born in March of this year. I'm not bothered by not having it!
Your 2024 CX-5 Signature has a 2.5T, and it doesn’t have cylinder deactivation.
 
I checked with a dealer and they said the CX 5 with the 2.5 NA L without CDA had different heads but I can't seem to verify this. It would be nice to know it all the hardware for CDA and Istop were not installed??
You actually could be right that Mazda could have just added some software only to disable the cylinder deactivation functioning with CD hardware is still there. But I doubt Mazda would be doing this which will cost them more with additional CD components when they openly claim the parts shortage on CD and i-stop features.

Yes the cylinder head is different between the 2.5L NA with CD and without CD (if it isn’t software disabled). See here:

Buy the 2024 CX-5 NA to avoid cylinder head crack issue?

The cylinder head used by cylinder deactivation is modified from original head from SkyActiv-G 2.5L NA to accommodate bigger switchable hydraulic lash adjusters and other plumbings for CD. There’re plenty of reports here and NHTSA website on cracked head with oil leak ONLY from the 2.5L NA with CD.

2.5 NA Cracked Cylinder Head with Oil leaking...How common is this?

NA CX-5 with Cylinder Deactivation Engine Repairs - Report In

Cracked cylinder head (2018 CX-5)

Cracked Block (2018 CX-5)

Cracked cylinder head - 2019 Mazda CX5 GT

Cracked cylinder head 2019 CX-5 with 26,000 miles



This’s incorrect. PYFA-10-100E is the cylinder head with cylinder deactivation. There’s no way the cylinder head is interchangeable between the 2.5L NA with CD and without CD as explained above.

Cylinder head PYFA-10-100E is for 2.5L NA with CD:

View attachment 329169
View attachment 329170
View attachment 329171
Cylinder head PYY2-10-SJ0 is for 2.5L NA without CD:

View attachment 329172
View attachment 329174

So if the head is cracked on a 2.5L NA with CD, dealer needs to order a cylinder head set kit p/n 0000-99-SCX5 which included a “loaded” head PYY4-10-SJ0 and all other necessary gaskets and washers to replace the cracked head.

View attachment 329176



No, PYFA-10-100E is only for 2.5L NA with CD, see above.



No, the 2.5L NA engine with cylinder deactivation has many differences from the 2.5L NA without CD. The transmission is different so as the exhaust system.

There’s a safety recall and many TSBs and SAs so far on the engine and transmission only for the 2.5L NA with CD. And those potential problems to the engine and transmission all are serious and costly if it happens:

Recall Campaign 3719F - Intake Valve Rocker Arm May Come Out of Position

TSB No.: 01-003/24 Check Engibe Light On with DTC P0524 or P055F: Engine Oil Solenoid Valve to Become Stuck

2017~2024 CX-5 Chirp Noise from Automatic Transaxle on 3-4 upshift - Bulletin 05-005/23

TSB No.:01-002/21 Tapping Noise from Engine, HLAs

SA No.: SA-037/23 New Cylinder Head Assembly Established



All have stated above.
 
What is "dogging" a car?
Driving like your grandma. Never revving the engine past 2500 rpm. That sort of thing.
The term applies more to standard shift cars than automatics.
Back when cars were 90% manual, people would shift early, and barely take the engine past 2,000 rpms. Running at 30 mile/hour in fourth gear with the engine barely above idle, and then trying to accelerate without downshifting. It would run like an old dog. Hence the saying "dogging it".
 
Does anyone know if the 24 turbo has a different head than the NA version? I've read turbos don't have CDA.
2.5T has different cylinder head due to added turbo plumbing. There’re 3 different cylinder heads for Mazda’s 2.5L series.

The cylinder head for original 2.5L NA without cylinder deactivation has p/n PYY2-10-SJ0.

The cylinder head for later 2.5L NA with CD has p/n PYFA-10-100E. However, there’s a “loaded” head PYY4-10-SJ0 for easy head replacement to save labor cost; and p/n 0000-99-SCX5 further includes necessary gaskets and washers with the loaded head to replace the cracked head.

Finally, the cylinder head for the 2.5T has p/n PYY1-10-SJ0C which of course is the latest updated version to prevent head crack. There’re many revisions for turbo head, PY8W-10-100、PY8W-10-100A、PY8W-10-100B、PY8W-10-100D、PYY1-10-SJ0A、PYY1-10-SJ0B、PYY1-10-SJ0R-00, and then the current one.

B0DA9C9E-88E4-4A88-B70D-BC970A18473F.webp

DAD0BB80-D4FF-4421-9DC4-5F38F55F0666.webp

A93FA283-37D8-4D5D-917B-CA7E8DF70ECD.webp


Details:
20990574-555C-445D-84A0-CADD3341C2D3.webp


56318556-4E9F-433C-9037-83AF352B5B5F.webp

3B2720E8-8686-406E-9436-118E944EB37D.webp


92E1C9FF-2B96-464F-BA26-3500978208E2.webp



I've read that the trans has more clutch packs. The front brakes require a different rotor and pads as well, I'm assuming larger.
For CX-5’s with 2.5T, the automatic transmission has beefed up to handle the bigger torque. Actually Mazda simply just uses the same heavier duty transmission from the 2.2L diesel which has been on the market since 2012 worldwide. It has the same multi-pack lock-up clutch (not the clutch pack for gears as you implied) in torque converter. However, the transmission used for 2.5L NA with CD has to switch to a single plate lock-up clutch in torque converter to save space for a fulcrum to reduce the CD vibration unfortunately which could contaminates the ATF with iron power due to excessive wear:

Automatic Transaxle on 3-4 upshift - Bulletin 05-005/23

And yes the front brakes are larger with dual-piston caliper, again, they’re from 2.2L diesel model.
 

Attachments

  • DD7FAAAD-703E-47C6-A60B-C29E686AD948.webp
    DD7FAAAD-703E-47C6-A60B-C29E686AD948.webp
    19.3 KB · Views: 72
Driving like your grandma. Never revving the engine past 2500 rpm. That sort of thing.
The term applies more to standard shift cars than automatics.
Back when cars were 90% manual, people would shift early, and barely take the engine past 2,000 rpms. Running at 30 mile/hour in fourth gear with the engine barely above idle, and then trying to accelerate without downshifting. It would run like an old dog. Hence the saying "dogging it".
LOL I would have thought it meant the opposite.
 
2.5T has different cylinder head due to added turbo plumbing. There’re 3 different cylinder heads for Mazda’s 2.5L series.

The cylinder head for original 2.5L NA without cylinder deactivation has p/n PYY2-10-SJ0.

The cylinder head for later 2.5L NA with CD has p/n PYFA-10-100E. However, there’s a “loaded” head PYY4-10-SJ0 for easy head replacement to save labor cost; and p/n 0000-99-SCX5 further includes necessary gaskets and washers with the loaded head to replace the cracked head.

Finally, the cylinder head for the 2.5T has p/n PYY1-10-SJ0C which of course is the latest updated version to prevent head crack. There’re many revisions for turbo head, PY8W-10-100、PY8W-10-100A、PY8W-10-100B、PY8W-10-100D、PYY1-10-SJ0A、PYY1-10-SJ0B、PYY1-10-SJ0R-00, and then the current one.

View attachment 329218
View attachment 329219
View attachment 329221

Details:
View attachment 329222

View attachment 329223
View attachment 329224

View attachment 329225



For CX-5’s with 2.5T, the automatic transmission has beefed up to handle the bigger torque. Actually Mazda simply just uses the same heavier duty transmission from the 2.2L diesel which has been on the market since 2012 worldwide. It has the same multi-pack lock-up clutch (not the clutch pack for gears as you implied) in torque converter. However, the transmission used for 2.5L NA with CD has to switch to a single plate lock-up clutch in torque converter to save space for a fulcrum to reduce the CD vibration unfortunately which could contaminates the ATF with iron power due to excessive wear:

Automatic Transaxle on 3-4 upshift - Bulletin 05-005/23

And yes the front brakes are larger with dual-piston caliper, again, they’re from 2.2L diesel model.
Massively cheaper for the turbo head... Another advantage. And you don't have to worry about deactivation either.
 
Funny... that's what I and close others in my circles always thought that meant too... treating a vehicle like POS at all RPMs and temps

I've never heard it termed that way toward those light on the throttle and lugging

LOL I would have thought it meant the opposite.
 
Funny... that's what I and close others in my circles always thought that meant too... treating a vehicle like POS at all RPMs and temps

I've never heard it termed that way toward those light on the throttle and lugging
Well, I'm an old fart, and dogging or lugging it meant what I said (this is years ago). With almost all cars being automatics, it's harder to lug it, as the tranny will downshift for you. Back in the day when 90% of cars were manual, it meant shifting early and keeping the engine at low revs where it had no pull.
 
Lugging and Dogging to me are two different things. Lugging is early shifting while loading the vehicle, not downshifting up hills with the gas pedal down, etc. Dogging the vehicle is driving hard without regard for engine temp, maintenance, cooling, bouncing off the rev limiter all the time, full throttle constantly, etc., just basically treating the vehicle like crap.
 
Lugging and Dogging to me are two different things. Lugging is early shifting while loading the vehicle, not downshifting up hills with the gas pedal down, etc. Dogging the vehicle is driving hard without regard for engine temp, maintenance, cooling, bouncing off the rev limiter all the time, full throttle constantly, etc., just basically treating the vehicle like crap.
Interesting. I guess if you put the word hot in front of dogging, then I can understand that interpretation. Like I said, in my day, dogging it and lugging it amounted to the same thing. Either way, it's all good.
 
My Acura MDX Advance has idle stop and there is no option to disable it in vehicle settings. You have to press a button every time you turn the car on if you want to disable it. Or install an idle stopper. A lot of people have had problems with the car failing to restart, mostly because of aging batteries. I am so glad my 21 CX-5 GT-P does NOT have this horrid feature. MDX models without idle stop are marketed with 1mpg less fuel economy. Even 1mpg seems overrated. It's hard on batteries, hard on starters, and increases traffic backups. So thankful the cx-5 I have doesn't have that nonsense.
 
My Acura MDX Advance has idle stop and there is no option to disable it in vehicle settings. You have to press a button every time you turn the car on if you want to disable it. Or install an idle stopper. A lot of people have had problems with the car failing to restart, mostly because of aging batteries. I am so glad my 21 CX-5 GT-P does NOT have this horrid feature. MDX models without idle stop are marketed with 1mpg less fuel economy. Even 1mpg seems overrated. It's hard on batteries, hard on starters, and increases traffic backups. So thankful the cx-5 I have doesn't have that nonsense.
If you dislike the i-stop, you should really hate the cylinder deactivation which not only makes the 2.5L NA so complicated, but also you can’t just press a button to disable it. You have an Acura MDX, the 3.5L V6 has Variable Cylinder Management™ (VCM®), a cylinder deactivation system which is having bad reputation with long term problems and many have installed an aftermarket device to disable it.
 
I have this feature on my Volvo and dint mind it at all. And in the newer Volvo that I had as a loaner it's even further refined. Barely notice it. And with the long ass lights in my suburb? It's worth it. Lol
 
Back