we have 33k on our ms6 no problems.
did great on my dads road trip from FL to PA and got good mpg (around 30)
that ms3 looks like it was taken very good care of also. just because its modded doesnt mean anything.
Is it the same exact engine in the MS6? Just wondering...
Yes and same as the CX-7 and regular 3 GT(the one that says 2.3 on the side)
The reliability for the regular Mazda3 is SPOTLESS. Perfect.
I was originally looking at a regular Mazda3, but the price for the Mazda3S GT I want is SO CLOSE to the MS3, why shouldn't I spring the extra grand or so and get a REAL performance car...
i think you just answered your question right there. if you're ONLY looking for a reliable daily driver and DO NOT have any plans on modding it...i say stick with the N/A 3.
- it saves you some gas money by putting regular unleaded compare to ms3 91 - 93 octane premium unleaded.
- you have the option for a auto/manual trans. (+ sunroof)
- N/A 3 is a little cheaper than the ms3.
- less moving parts (turbocharged) = less parts to break.
my .02 cents.
i think you just answered your question right there. if you're ONLY looking for a reliable daily driver and DO NOT have any plans on modding it...i say stick with the N/A 3.
- it saves you some gas money by putting regular unleaded compare to ms3 91 - 93 octane premium unleaded.
- you have the option for a auto/manual trans. (+ sunroof)
- N/A 3 is a little cheaper than the ms3.
- less moving parts (turbocharged) = less parts to break.
my .02 cents.
its not the same turbo as the one on the cx-7 and its not exactly the same as the regular 3 gt either ive heard, its direct injection for one and the piston are forged for the ms3 i think...
Yes the CX-7 has a different turbo... but the engine itself is the same. The regular 3gt I thought was a the same as well but its a little different. I corrected my original post.
i think you just answered your question right there. if you're ONLY looking for a reliable daily driver and DO NOT have any plans on modding it...i say stick with the N/A 3.
- it saves you some gas money by putting regular unleaded compare to ms3 91 - 93 octane premium unleaded.
- you have the option for a auto/manual trans. (+ sunroof)
- N/A 3 is a little cheaper than the ms3.
- less moving parts (turbocharged) = less parts to break.
my .02 cents.
good luck to you....regardless whether you pick a N/A 3 or ms3.
OK,
My dad went down to KC on business and stopped to look at the 2009 MS3 White pearl with 19k on it. NON-GT. Asking price is $18,371. Only modification is an SRI. (Pic of SRI earlier in thread)
Asking about alignment issues. My dad says the tires are worn on the edges, all four of them are to the point of needing to be replaced. Do these cars have any common alignment issues? OR does this point towards the car being lowered at some point?
No other issues with the car. If I get some reassuring answers from this post I am going down to KC this Saturday to pick it up!
Thanks guys!