Fast Money - BMW M5 vs CLS55 AMG vs HSV Senator (Holden Commodore)

mikeyb

Member
Contributor
:
01 BMW 325xi Touring
Move over Porsche and Ferrari, here come the supercars disguised as sedans. JOSHUA DOWLING tests the world's fastest four-doors. </B>

19fast_leadimage.jpg
If these cars were human, they'd be businessmen in sharp suits - wearing sprinter's spikes instead of shiny leather shoes. They combine supercar performance in a luxury-car package. In one of these, you really are a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Any of these fit four-doors will happily see off a Porsche or a Ferrari and carry four adults in comfort.

To the untrained eye, they are relatively discreet. Subtle bulges, vents, big brakes, wide tyres and a low-slung stance are some of the give-aways. But just in case these clues aren't enough, the German cars have four massive exhaust pipes, which are about as subtle as diamond-encrusted cuff links.

While there is a limit to how fast you can travel on public roads, there's no limit to how quickly you can reach the limit. All three of these cars can reach 100kmh in 5 seconds or less. And they go about it different ways.

Mercedes uses supercharging, BMW uses extra cylinders (it's the world's first V10-powered sedan), whereas Holden's performance car division uses simple cubic capacity to get its flagship moving. With a 6.0-litre V8, it's the biggest engine here.

Purists may tut-tut at the inclusion of the humble, homegrown Holden in such esteemed company but the reality is that the HSV Senator - in performance stakes at least - has every right to rub shoulders with the German thoroughbreds. In fact, in our test, the Senator was quicker than the BMW M5 in a straight line in everyday driving.

Importantly, each of these sedans delivers a level of comfort and luxury that is foreign to cramped, lightweight sports cars. No wonder Porsche is worried. With the big luxury brands eating away at its sports car market - with sedans that have better performance in a roomier package - Porsche has been forced to respond. Last month, Porsche announced it plans to build its first-ever high-performance sedan, due on sale in 2007. Hey, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

After driving these vehicles it's no wonder they have piqued Porsche's interest and why they are the hottest property in the car world at the moment. The waiting list stretches from three months for a Senator to six months for either of the Germans. Customer demand is so strong that even media evaluation vehicles are in short supply.

We were lucky to secure the two Germans at the same time. With the help of an obliging Senator owner, who donated his time and his car, we were able to complete this world exclusive test of the fastest sedans on the planet. Here's how they compared.



<HR>BMW M5


Credit where credit is due. BMW is the pioneer of super-quick sedans - and the reason we are spoiled for choice today. As this test clearly shows, BMW no longer has the market to itself. Most notably, arch rival Mercedes' performance division, AMG, has matched BMW model for model and even added a few that BMW doesn't have. This is the fourth generation M5 and, it's fair to say, BMW has the formula figured out. Or should we say, its formula figured out. For the M5 is by far the most narrow in its focus among this trio. Marketing hype aside, it is a race car for the road and comes with compromises: driveability and comfort.
Using technology gleaned from its Formula One program, BMW has somehow squeezed a 5.0-litre V10 engine under the nose of its 5 Series sedan. It's an engineering marvel not least because it can fit such a big engine under the bonnet but also because of how much power it has extracted: an amazing 373kW.

However, that power is available only at extremely high revs - 7750rpm - and the M5's V10 has less torque than the Holden. While many enthusiasts get excited over power figures, it's torque that really gets cars moving. Don't get us wrong, the M5 is still a rapid car but it takes a lot more finesse to extract its best and a lot more room on the road, preferably a race track. By the time you have reached the M5's power band, it's time to change gears. By comparison, the other sedans deliver most of their grunt instantly and from lower in the rev range.

There's plenty of incentive to explore the V10's potential. It sounds awesome at high revs, with a raspy induction noise from the engine bay and a high-tech growl from the four exhausts. It's just a pity that, at idle, when you're showing off to your mates, it sounds almost like a diesel engine.

Despite the many improvements BMW has made to the M5's sequential manual gearbox, it still requires some TLC. As it engages first gear it jerks and then there is a brief pause before it actually bites and gets moving and that even happens in what has been affectionately dubbed the Opera House mode - a BMW way of saying cruise mode. There are 11 other modes and shift patterns from which to choose, which produce faster gear changes but the shifts become increasingly harsh as it climbs the spectrum.

In automatic mode, the shifts are smoother but the system still snatches off the line; we struggled to get a smooth start, even in stop-start traffic. The illuminated shift paddles on the steering wheel are a nice touch, though.

BMW, for its part, makes no apologies for the M5's character. It proudly boasts that the M5 is not for everyone. The company line is that performance-car purists only need apply. "The M5 is a car enjoyed by experienced high-performance drivers who take pleasure in exercising their skills behind the wheel," says the company spokesman. And that, presumably, means customers who do the occasional race track day.

Of this trio, the M5 would be most at home on a circuit. Its superior levels of cornering grip, sharper steering and more responsive handling would help the driver extract the most from the engine.

Around town and on regular Australian back roads, however, the M5 is a brute. Its ride was the harshest of all three and when the throttle was squeezed - even from a cruising speed - the M5 was the last to respond, as it fidgeted for the right gear and then began its long climb up the rev counter.

The M5 also had the least liveable interior of the trio. Drive has previously documented the 5 Series' shortcomings, so we won't go into detail again here, but suffice to say it lacks storage space for even a phone or a wallet - and the central control knob (iDrive) which is intended to simplify audio, satellite-navigation and air-conditioning controls is still no easier to use.

It's a shame that the rest of the interior has so many shortcomings, as the M5's seats are by far the most comfortable of the three cars, with ample adjustment in every direction and two particularly nice touches. The lower seat cushion can be extended so that it supports your upper legs right up to the back of your knees but, best of all, the side bolsters squeeze the driver and front passenger like tongs. When you start the car they grip alongside your ribcage and in fast corners, they will attempt to compensate for body movement. For example, in a fast left-hand bend, when G-forces will want to push your body right, the right side bolster will push you to the left. It feels weird at first but awesome once you're used to it. It helps keep your body aligned and your mind focused.

Another neat touch is the heads-up display in the lower section of the windscreen, which shows engine revs and driving speed. Only one problem: if you have polarised sunglasses, the display is almost invisible during the day.

The other minor complaint was the size of the BMW's side mirrors; despite being convex, they are still too small to properly see what's going on beside and behind you. After all, most other cars on the road will be in the M5's mirrors.

RRP: $226,000

Engine: 5.0-litre V10

Power: 373kW at 7750rpm

Torque: 520Nm at 6100rpm

Transmission: 7-speed sequential manual

Weight: 1755kg

0 to 100kmh: 4.7 seconds*

Top speed: 250kmh (limited)

Front brakes: Four-piston calipers with 374mm x 36mm drilled and vented discs

Rear brakes: Two-piston calipers with 370mm x 24mm drilled and vented discs

Fuel consumption rating: 14.8 litres/100km

*Manufacturers' claims



<HR>Mercedes-Benz CLS 55 AMG


Mercedes-Benz doesn't have performance sedans in its heritage; the inventor of the automobile built its reputation on quality, luxury and the occasional sports car. But that is changing. Over the past decade Mercedes has improved its credentials as a builder of performance cars. In order to be considered a worthy rival, Mercedes' philosophy has been, quite simply, to over-deliver.
We're not sure how or where BMW arrived at its claimed 0-100kmh figure of 4.7 seconds but we suspect it was in ideal circumstances, in "launch control" mode because we never got anywhere near that figure in "normal" mode.

Your grandmother, on the other hand, could pull a 4.7 out of the CLS 55, its power is so accessible and the car so easy to drive. BMW (or even Mercedes for that matter) may regard that comment as an insult but, we reckon, what is the point of having all this power if it's not easy to use?

The CLS 55's drivetrain is a formidable force. Its supercharged 5.4-litre V8 (fast fact for the pointy-heads: despite the 55 badge, the cubic capacity actually rounds down to 5.4 litres) is so powerful that Mercedes had to come up with a computer program to cut engine torque on take off, otherwise the rear wheels would spin even more than they do with its mind-boggling 700Nm of torque. While BMW has opted for a seven-speed manual gearbox with sequential shift, the CLS 55 uses a five-speed auto which has a manual mode and whose gears can be changed using F1-style buttons on the steering wheel.

The result is one of the most responsive drivetrains we've ever experienced, reacting precisely to every slight movement of the accelerator pedal. Want to idle slowly through the traffic? It'll purr so softly and smoothly you can barely hear it. Need to be somewhere in a hurry: stand on the loud pedal and hang on until it's time to peel your head from the headrest. How can a car that looks so elegant accelerate with such force?

The CLS 55 is breathtaking on full throttle. The deep V8 rumble combined with the subtle supercharger whine is an addictive sound that will have you coming back for more. The Drive jury is still debating whether it sounds better from inside the car or from the outside. Who cares, we agreed, as long as we can hear it. The Mercedes easily had the best set of lungs. It's also the most luxurious of this trio, with four superb sports seats, ample storage and user-friendly controls.

To understand why, here's a quick history lesson: the CLS is actually based on the underpinnings of the current E-Class sedan. Mercedes found that longstanding E-Class buyers wanted something more elite (but didn't want a large car such as the S-Class) and its CLK coupe buyers wanted more space but didn't want to sacrifice style. So the CLS was born - a Coupe-Like Sedan.

The CLS experiment also gave Mercedes an opportunity to sharpen up the handling by lowering the centre of gravity (compared with the E-Class) and fettling the steering and suspension. Drive was cynical of the CLS at first, but after driving it, the changes are not only noticeable, but worthwhile.

While it's not the razor sharp instrument in corners that the M5 is, the CLS 55 is still willing and very able; it's a significant improvement on the E55 with which it shares its underpinnings.

Mercedes has attempted to give customers the best of both worlds with two suspension settings: comfort and sport modes. We tried both and reckon that on bumpy backroads you're better off leaving it in comfort mode so that it can better soak up bumps and thumps and get its power to the ground.

The brakes on both the Germans were nothing short of stunning: both had massive calipers and discs the size of large pizza trays. It's good to see that the Germans take stopping as seriously as they take acceleration. It's a pity the same can't be said for the Australian contender.

RRP: $247,900

Engine: Supercharged 5.4-litre V8

Power: 350kW at 6100rpm

Torque: 700Nm at 2650-4500rpm

Transmission: 5-speed automatic

Weight: 1775kg

0 to 100kmh: 4.7 seconds*

Top speed: 250kmh (limited)

Front brakes: Eight-piston calipers with 360mm x 36mm drilled and vented discs

Rear brakes: Four-piston calipers with 330mm x 26mm drilled and vented discs

Fuel consumption rating: 13.6 litres/100km*

*Manufacturers' claims



<HR>
 
HSV Senator




To save you reaching for the calculator, we've done the sums already. You can have three Senators and some loose change for the same price as a BMW M5 - or you could have three Senators and enough money left over for a Holden Commodore Executive for the same price as a Mercedes CLS 55.
On price, you could say this is not a fair fight. But based on performance the Senator has every right to be considered in this company. The suburban hero is more than capable of taking care of itself in a contest against the suits from the big end of town.

Look at the numbers: 6.0-litre V8 with 297kW of power and 530Nm of torque - more torque than the BMW. The result: a claimed and easily repeatable 0-100kmh time of 5.0 seconds. It's the quickest Australian-made sedan ever built.

Like a lot of things in our backyard, we tend to take homegrown performance cars for granted. It's worth noting that, for a brief period a few years ago, HSV held the mantle of the world's fastest sedan - until Mercedes discovered supercharging. Powered by the same high-output V8 fitted to another performance icon, the Corvette, the Senator is capable of reaching 273kmh if it were ever to be driven on a speed-unlimited autobahn. (The German pair would probably exceed this, if they weren't electronically limited to 250kmh.)

The 6.0-litre is a superb engine, with 87 per cent of peak torque available from just 1600rpm. Incredibly, the Senator is the most frugal among this trio and 10 per cent more efficient than its less powerful predecessor. Its broad power-band means that you're getting the best from the engine from low revs and then all the way to the 6500rpm redline. It's just a pity that the Senator doesn't sound gutsy. You'd think the brash Aussie would be a bit of a loud mouth but instead it's more refined than the German pair. We reckon most buyers would prefer the Senator to demonstrate a bit more of its character.

(Trivia note: the Z Series HSVs are the first V8-powered HSVs not to be fitted with exhaust extractors, which has performance buffs wondering how much more power will be unleashed once the engine breathes better. HSV said 297kW was enough power for now. Translation: HSV wanted to leave something up its sleeve for the all-new Commodore due in late 2006.)

The other trick to the Senator's acceleration is the gearbox, which has good points and bad points. In polite terms, the Senator's four-speed automatic is outdated. It is a rudimentary, heavy-duty design that, despite the best efforts of HSV engineers, does not want to shift smoothly. So, rather than try to achieve the impossible, HSV went the other way and made the shifts more abrupt, which also helped deliver faster acceleration times as there is less delay between gears. As a result, the Senator is 0.3 seconds quicker to 100kmh than a six-speed manual HSV.

The shifts are so abrupt that the tail of the car has a wiggle and the tyres chirp as it shifts from first to second. On cold tyres it catches your attention and your breath. After re-acquainting ourselves with the Senator, we were reminded just how close it is to benchmark cars that are triple its price. It also had us wondering what it would be like with a smooth six-speed auto.

HSV has done a nice job sprucing up the new Senator, with soft (and expensive) nappa leather, ambient lighting for the console and carbon-fibre-look highlights in the cabin. The Senator is also more distinctive externally thanks to lashings of chrome. Even though it's based on the Commodore, Australia's biggest selling car, the Senator is finally starting to look a million bucks. That said, there is still always room for improvement.

With the Z Series, HSV has attempted to soften the Senator's suspension because it figured buyers of this model would prefer more of a luxury feel. It's a softer ride than its Clubsport cousin but it compromises handling and can feel wallowy at times. This has been addressed somewhat with a recent switch to Yokohama tyres on the Clubsport, which have helped sharpen the steering and eliminate most of the front-end flutter on bumpy stuff. We reckon the Clubsport set-up would suit the Senator.

That leaves the small matter of the brakes. The front discs are the same size as or smaller than the rears on either of the Germans. Given the cars are of similar weight and power, it's evident that the Senator is under-done in this department. The Senator brakes are same as those fitted to the latest Corvette. But there is one crucial difference: the Corvette has 200kg less weight to pull up every time the brakes are applied.

HSV says that Senator buyers are less likely to drive their cars as hard as Clubsport customers do. But performance is performance. And with this much grunt, bigger brakes should be standard or at the very least available as an option. Our generous Senator owner, who brought along the car you see in these pictures, tried to order the big brakes but HSV does not make them available on this model even though they can be bolted straight on.

It's a pity, because with bigger brakes, a better gearbox and Clubsport tyres and suspension, the Senator would come close to being a match for the Germans - and maybe even dust one of them up. Not bad for a car that costs less than a third of the price.

RRP: $72,140

Engine: 6.0-litre V8

Power: 297kW at 6000rpm

Torque: 530Nm at 4400rpm

Transmission: 4-speed automatic

Weight: 1735kg

0 to 100kmh: 5.0 seconds*

Top speed: 273kmh*

Front brakes: Two-piston calipers with 330mm x 32mm grooved and vented discs

Rear brakes: Single-piston calipers with 315mm x 18mm grooved and vented discs

Fuel consumption rating: 13.3 litres/100km

*Manufacturers' claims



<HR>So, which car wins?




The world's motoring press is divided over which car is superior: the BMW M5 or Mercedes CLS 55. The Drive office is no different:
Why I'd buy the CLS 55, by Joshua Dowling

Maybe it was because I read all the hype about the BMW M5 in the overseas magazines before I got to drive it. Or maybe it was because I didn't attend the local press launch on a race track where, no doubt, the M5 would be in its element. But when I got behind the wheel of the M5 for the first time I honestly said aloud to myself: "Is that it?" After driving it for several days - and on this back-to-back test - my opinion of the M5 didn't change. I was beginning to wonder if I'd become too accustomed to fast cars. How on earth could I be underwhelmed by a car with 373kW and a V10, no less? I know what did it to me: the CLS 55. Its acceleration is nothing short of breathtaking, instant and accessible. Best of all, unlike the BMW, you don't have to wait while the gearbox faffs about wondering what it's going to do next. By the time the BMW gets into gear, the Mercedes is gone. If the idea of this type of car is to combine the convenience and luxury of a sedan with supercar performance, the CLS has it won, hands down. I'm off to the newsagent to buy a lottery ticket.

Why I'd buy the M5, by Bob Jennings

If you're going to have a full-on, red-hot sporting sedan, it might as well be one that does the job properly and for me, the BMW M5 does it better. I concede that the Mercedes is more user-friendly and luxurious for day-to-day use and has amazing low-speed throttle response. It has a more luxurious and practical cabin and looks stunning. But as a sporting sedan that can be used in motor sports - I'm thinking Targa Tasmania and the like - then the M5 is it. Once the mysteries of the iDrive are plumbed there's a brilliant selection of settings for suspension, engine and gearbox. The faster it goes the better-balanced it gets with superb handling and braking and an engine that revs like there's no tomorrow. The electronically-controlled manual gearbox is temperamental around town but in its element when the car's going quickly. The perfect seating, which seamlessly connects the driver with the car, is the BMW M5's finishing touch.

Geoff's pick: the Mercedes CLS 55

Geoff King, 54, a national account manager from Sydney, loves Holdens and loves V8s. His HSV Senator is his 14th new Holden - the 12th V8 and the second HSV. After being our back-seat tester on this comparison we offered him a drive of both German cars but he only wanted to drive the Mercedes. He was put off by the BMW's sequential manual gearbox and, even from the back seat, he could tell the Mercedes had more grunt. "This is incredible," he beams, moments after applying the accelerator and pushing us all back into our seats. "How long has this been going on? And why can't HSV do this? I'd pay another $20,000 if HSV could make a car as responsive as this." King quickly identifies two key areas of improvement for his HSV: "Brakes and the transmission. Every time HSV sends me a customer satisfaction survey I put those at the top of the list. The brakes don't have anywhere near the bite that I'd like; I wanted to get the premium brakes (six-piston AP calipers are a $3750 option) but HSV don't make them available on the Senator. Why? And the shift in the auto is way too harsh." Despite its foibles, King still loves his HSV. "I wouldn't swap it. Well, actually, I wouldn't mind swapping it for one of these," he says, swinging the CLS key.



<HR>Want one? Join the queue




Mercedes has sold the first shipment of CLS 55s; 36 cars were ordered before it was even launched and 34 have been delivered so far. Three customers were owners of the CLS 55's twin under the skin, the E55, while the rest are a mix of Porsche, BMW and Maserati owners. Another 35 or so CLS 55s are due before the end of the year and Mercedes is trying to increase next year's allocation of just 70 cars. BMW, meanwhile, says it will deliver 100 M5s to customers before year's end. The new Senator is one of HSV's success stories. Sales have doubled with the introduction of the new model, which is quicker, better equipped and marginally cheaper than the model it replaced. The Senator is a big drawcard to the HSV brand: 68 per cent of Z Series Senator owners have never owned an HSV before.


<HR>Where's Ford?




Ford's fast-car division, Ford Performance Vehicles, does not have a direct rival for the HSV Senator. Despite having 290kW of power, the Ford V8 doesn't deliver the same acceleration as the other cars in this group. FPV does have a luxury version of the GT but it's not yet in the five-second club. That may change, however, when a new six-speed automatic is fitted to performance Falcons by the end of the year. And then, it will most likely to be the turbocharged six-cylinder (with 550Nm of torque) that will crack a low five-second 0-100kmh time. FPV is putting the finishing touches on the six-speed auto Typhoon and engineers are said to be grinning about the performance of the vehicle during testing.


<HR>source:http://www.drive.com.au/editorial/article.aspx?id=10173&vf=2&bg=1&pp=0
 

New Threads

Back