well maybe not being accurate is a bad choice of words on my part, what I meant is that everyone elses uses whp so it would be a better comparison.CorkSport said:Because that's how their dyno works. How do you figure it's not accurate?
Out of curiosity... Please share what products are a better bang for your buck that are safe and can be smogged?
On the test car (intake, exhaust, Tuner Computer. Under $1,500 retail price. Dyno shows a 78hp increase. $18.58 per horse power is pretty good if you ask me.
Are you saying that the exhaust ,intake, and tuner computer is under $1500.00? If that is the case WOW, that is a deal.CorkSport said:Because that's how their dyno works. How do you figure it's not accurate?
Out of curiosity... Please share what products are a better bang for your buck that are safe and can be smogged?
On the test car (intake, exhaust, Tuner Computer. Under $1,500 retail price. Dyno shows a 78hp increase. $18.58 per horse power is pretty good if you ask me.
Add a conservative 10% to any whp number to get the approx crank numbers...tekkie said:well maybe not being accurate is a bad choice of words on my part, what I meant is that everyone elses uses whp so it would be a better comparison.
AnswerWilsman00 said:(snip)....Also id the chip capable of a 2 stage system where from some kind of switch I could change from cruisin gas mileage mode to all out power mode? I read an article about a few cars that could adjust the boost like that and had good fuel maps for both to optimize economy or optimize 1/4 mi if needed. Can this system do that?
CorkSport said:(snip)....BTW, this time at the shop they added switches to change settings (as someone asked about doing in here). I can go from stock boost to high boost. They also built in maps for high octane fuel.
orangezoom said:Are you saying that the exhaust ,intake, and tuner computer is under $1500.00? If that is the case WOW, that is a deal.
I still beleave they need to retune that, before they release it, but WOW good deal if that is the case
mx3ownzj00 said:TurboXS has had problems with getting the Unichips to work on the WRX's. "when they work, they work great, but when they don't it becomes hell"
That's why they've switched to utec. As long as I can get a Unchip to run ~11.8A/F I plan on picking one up in August. 12.5 is too leanf or me though.
Well, if someone says it runs 12.5 A/F I assume its averaging 12.5 and stay pretty consitant, under boost. 12.5 is too lean for my tastes. I wanna see no leaner than 12.0. The FS-DE likes the richer side of 12 though, atleast in the majority of tuning info I've read.Spooled said:Why is everyone scared of a 12.5:1 A/F ratio? Yes, that does seem a little lean for the stock intercooler temps, but as long as it stays stable, everything should be fine. Is there something that I'm missing? Also, I'd like to see the A/F maps to see when it's at 12.5:1. It may be that it's that lean before boost is even kicks in. Not a pro, but I am curious.