That is not true. They can void the entire warranty for any modification. It is stated quite plainly on page 11 of the warranty booklet.
Its semantics. A dealership cannot void your warranty, they can deny warranty work. Mazda NA voids the warranty. Unless Mazda works differently than the manufacturer I work for.
Its semantics. A dealership cannot void your warranty, they can deny warranty work. Mazda NA voids the warranty. Unless Mazda works differently than the manufacturer I work for.
Mazda can also authorize a dealer, with or without the buyer's consent or notification, to void warranties on their behalf. I am sure this is probably part of the standard dealer agreement between Mazda USA and most, if not all, Mazda dealers.
Point is, the language is there that places the burden on the buyer to not modify the car, or seek written blessing from Mazda that something is not a modification.
I don't have my original sales agreement here, but I believe that when you buy a car, you are buying it from your dealer, not from Mazda USA, so the agreements in force are between you and the dealer. I am not confident this has any bearing on whether or not it is a dealer or MUSA that can void a warranty. There are probably all kinds of cross-authorizations that allow them to do pretty much whatever they want.
That is not true. They can void the entire warranty for any modification. It is stated quite plainly on page 11 of the warranty booklet.
They are very vague about "Alteration, modification, tampering, etc.." on Page 11 (2008) of your Warranty Information Booklet. They do not define what "Alterarion," "Modification," or "Tampering" are, nor do they use the typical "Including but not limited to" legalese, but rather a more informal "etc..." However, this does not change anything.
The argument will probably be made by someone that it is a warranty booklet and not a contract. But, if you look at the standard sales agreement that you signed when you purchased the car, it says:
"THE PRINTED NEW VEHICLE WARRANTY DELIVERED TO THE PURCHASER WITH SUCH A VEHICLE OR CHASSIS AND HEREBY MADE A PART OF HEREOF AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN IS THE ONLY WARRANTY APPLICABLE TO SUCH A NEW VEHICLE OR CHASSIS AND IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE"
I am not a lawyer, but it seems that this language makes your Warranty Information booklet enforceable as part of the sales agreement, and you agreed by signing to follow maintenance according to the appropriate schedule outlined in the book.
In my non-legal opinion, it would seem reasonable that your act of modifying the car to increase performance would easily be considered a "modification" according to the definition on page 11, making your entire warranty void.
You might get a lawyer to argue your case (emphasis on "might"), and even if you could, it would cost you more than a new MS3, and you would probably lose. At least, if I were on the jury, I would see it that way.
Funny things about contracts. They are enforceable whether or not you read them before you signed them...
+1
Also, when a dealer calls up Mazda, they (Mazda) have NO idea what the car has on it. It's the dealer that 'rats' the owner out. So while the dealer themselves don't authorize the voiding of the warranty, they are indirectly responsible for it. If a dealer wants to be cool, they can perform warranty work on a car with crazy mods and Mazda wouldn't know squat.
You seem pretty knowledgable about the subject. You supplied all the necessary sources and paperwork. And you used industry specific vocabulary. All of this plus the March Join date leads me to this conclusion...
Mazda Warranty SPY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (getout)
-mk
Im not sure but I believe if its something major as a motor or trans, mazda will send someone to take a look at the car.
I would even go so far as to speculate that MazdaUSA probably has a bonus program to reward dealers for turning in warranty fraud cases, and there are probably metrics for warranty work dollars that dealers are held to when determining their year-end factory bonus (which is the only money dealers really make).
That is 100% pure speculation, though, and I have no information that supports it in any way. I just wouldn't be surprised if it were true, and I don't put anything past corporate America anymore.
I would even go so far as to speculate that MazdaUSA probably has a bonus program to reward dealers for turning in warranty fraud cases, and there are probably metrics for warranty work dollars that dealers are held to when determining their year-end factory bonus (which is the only money dealers really make).
Warranties are a Liability to Mazda Corp. If they void warranties they remove the liability from their balance sheet, etc. This is good for financial reporting. Positive financial reporting probably means higher bonuses for Execs. Execs like higher bonuses.
Of course they probably have some sort of program to reward dealers for voiding warranties, or at a minimum reducing warranty work.
I'm pretty sure you're right about that. It happens in the computer service industry. If we do too many warranty repairs, hp charges us more for parts or we get less discounts. Same thing with Apple, etc. It would make sense in the Auto service industry as well.
But I've seen dealers bend over backwards for people so the outcome, imo, still rests heavily on the dealer's overall attitude.
I took it to 3 different dealers. It was always "normal," even though I also drove a new one one morning and it did not do it. They refused to document my complaint beyond "customer reports transmission problem. No problem found."
Long story short, I brought it in for it's 60k mile service at around 62k, and I get a call, "Hey, did you know your transmission won't go into high gears when it's cold? You need a new transmission, and it costs $5000," 2k miles after the warranty on the powertrain expired.
You can't tell me there wasn't something fishy going on there.![]()
You would be so surprised how far you can get just being NICE to the people working at the dealership.
did it help you with your pathfinder? i'm not saying be unreasonable, but for god's sake, stand up for what you pay for, and for what you rightly deserve. You know it as well as i that the first line of defense at these dealers will take advantage of people's fear of confrontation, lack of knowledge and inherently weak will.
I couldn't agree more with this philosophy, and yes, it did work just fine. I went to a dealer I hadn't gone to and just explained what happened, and we sat down and brainstormed about possible causes. At one point, I suggested there might not be a problem with the hardware, but rather with what the computer THINKS about the hardware (this is after all what I do for a living). Sure enough, the A/T temp sensor was telling the computer the trans was 30 degrees colder than it actually was, so the computer was locking out high gears to help warm it up.
$50 part..
I never back down if I know I am right, but at the same time I am tactful about doing it. You might be right, but that doesn't mean you win.![]()
I
I never back down if I know I am right, but at the same time I am tactful about doing it. You might be right, but that doesn't mean you win.![]()