65racecoupe said:A P5 can be really really fast, you just need forced induction and a built block. P5 is a really nice platform in reality - looks, brakes, suspension -![]()
anarchistchiken said:The protege is an economy car. No matter what model, year, or other iteration, at the end of the day it was designed to be an economy car. Yes, they can handle well, yes they look damn good, and yeah thay have decent brakes, but they are by no means a good platform for a fast daily driver.
In the years that people have been tuning proteges, they've never stopped pouring money into their cars and honestly no one has ever achieved really great results. We look up to Juan for hitting 11's in his P5, and we closely follow people like Focus and TurfBurn to see what their next dyno run will yield, but for the amount of money that you would have to put into a Protege to make it a 500 whp car capable of a 10 second quarter mile and still have the ability to hang with other cars in the turns, AND still be a dependable daily driver, it's just nuts. I mean I love the protege, and I'll keep it for a while and keep tuning it and boosting my power etc, but I accepted the fact a long time ago that I will never have a FAST car with the protege. It will be very quick, and it will be fun to drive, but as those power levels, it will never have the refinement and drivability that a car like an Evo has from the factory.
Just sayin, it's a good platform to have fun on, but you're deluding yourself when you say it's a good base to build off of if you want a fast daily driver.
I suppose this is true, but if a guy with a trans am put the amount of money into his car that TurfBurn or Focus or any number of other people on this board has, he would run 10's, or faster. I wasn't even talking about v-8's, so I don't know where that popped up from.65racecoupe said:Most V8 owners will never run 12s, so fast is relative to an owner.
Damn right it would be fast. However, a 12 second protege in street trim is probably not going to last a long time, even with a built motor. Just to put it in perspective, I'm willing to bet that a 12 second streetable IS300 will withstand many, many, many more thousands of miles of street use that a similairly fast protege.65racecoupe said:A REAL 12 sec street car is FAST. I wouldnt race for slips in my P5, but it would take a fast car to beat it (after turbo of course).
65racecoupe said:Civic - an economy car - can be modded to run 10s by many tuners. Yes, better motors, but still an economy car
Prodigy said:When my MSP popped on the dyno I pulled the engine from my 1990 Taurus SHO which is a 3.0L duratec (basically)....it is DIMENSIONALLY the same size as the 2.5L duratec.
It will NOT fit with extensive modification to the frame rails. The engine block IS longer believe it or not. In order to keep the belt system off the frame rail you'd have to cut the right axle and shorten it about 4-5" which would make torquesteer and wheelspin UNcontrolable.
The protege bay is big enough but not without butchering the tranny/axle/mounts/suspension.
I'm the only person I know who's gone this far with it in a 3rd gen.
After getting into totalling up the cost I sold the car and forgot all about it.
Putting an SHO engine/tranny RWD (midengine) would be MUCH easier....and actually quite possible.
-SuperMattyP
sweet!TR3CK said:KL V6 in a Protege? It can be done as you see:
![]()
Indeed. The 2.0 Probe shares almost the same engine as the Proteges and, thus, has the same engine mount locations on the block, tranny, and frame. The Probe V6 engines (the KLDE or KL03) mount to the same place on the frame as the 2.0s but have a few slightly different brackets that bolt to the block/tranny. If you're swapping in a KL engine in, might as well make it the KLZE, which is almost a DIRECT swap for the KLDE/03. It's a lil under 200 hp with about 160ish tq I think. You won't be making the full 200 hp unless you also have the imported ECU, which changes the RPMs that that activate the VRIS 1 and 2.flat_black said:Because the KL-ZE 2.5L was put in Probes/MX6's that shared the 2.0L engine with us.
Greg S said:It's a doable swap but yes the ECU will have to be changed. Best bet would be to go stand alone engine management and interface it to the ECU. There are a few people who have cracked the ECU coding for the KL series ECU so it is possible to get the coding and modify it. As for mounting you would need all the V6 motor mounts adn would possibly have to fab up some perches for one or two of them. Weight wise both engines are very close so you'll only be a little heavier in the front, but the engine compartment will be really tight. If you think getting acces to the enigne bay sucks on your Protege right now wait until you have to deal with a variable intake V6 in there, it's not fun. As for engine you are better of doing a built KL-03 rather than a KL-ZE as that 200 hp spec is only with the Japanese ECU and running 102 octance gas. Just not something you can get hold of every day. Thankfully there are both turbo and supercharger options for the KL series engine so added power is easy to make. The bottom half of the KL is built like a Chevy 350, 4 bolt mains and cross braced, the top end can really net some nice gains from port and polish work, knife edging everything and doing a 3-5 angle valve job. The internals on the other hand can handle nothing past 9 PSI max, so you would need to replace the rods and pistons if you were to go force induction with anything over that.
There is a lot of informantion out there for building up the KL series motors but there are not a lot of parts for it, all in all you are goingt o spenda fair amount of money getting power out of it. I would only do the swap if I had a pare motor or could get one for almost nothing as the 30 horsepower you would get with just a straight swap wouldn't be worth the money of having to buy the enigne. If you decided to build it up the only advantage it would have over the 2.0 4 is that it is a non-interference engine so if you slip the timing belt you don't destroy the internals like the 4 bagner would.
One last note if anyone does do this the best year engine to get is the 94-95 ones as the 93 was a first production year and they have some issues and the 96-up has OBD-II with the twin cats and all the extra enigne management associated with OBD-II.
TR3CK said:KL V6 in a Protege? It can be done as you see:
![]()
MikeBlueP5 said:I always thought the older SHO's had a 3.2 Yamaha engine, not a 3 liter duratec. The SHO 3.2 is bigger and different than the 3 liter, but you are correct the 2.5 and 3.0 are somewhat similar, the heads ( with slight work) will swap from the 3 liter to 2.5, ah i just ate my words, because the only 3.0 with DOHC would be in the SHO, and the other 3.0s are in the block cam iron. thats what i have in my ranger. But anyways the duratec i believe are iron block v6's because they started using them in the rangers in 95 or 96. I cant think of the name they gave the yamaha SHO engines.
There's really not that much of a difference. It's an iron block with aluminum heads just like the FS. I'm using Sprint springs in my Probe like a friend of mine with the ZE. On the same size tires, he's only like a fourth to maybe half an inch lower than me in the front. I don't remember the spring rates, but that would be what? maybe 75 lbs. or so? It's probably no different than the weight a full intercooled turbo kit would add.AZDriftR said:how much heavier is the k series over the FS? would this not horrible destroy whatever weight dist. that we have and make the car way front heavy?
TR3CK said:KL V6 in a Protege? It can be done as you see:
![]()
shaneMazda2000P said:Whos car is that and is it finished??