I know exactly what you're saying...but just to play devil's advocate, the old GTO when it was first released was the same way -- just the standard pontiac platform with a big 'ol engine slapped in it. So from that standpoint they did follow the old formula. But I agree, Ford has the right idea in "updating" to the retro look. GM doesn't know WTF it's doing. I have a GM credit card that's maxed out in earnings but there's not a SINGLE GM car that I'm interested in buying other than the vette, which is out of my price range. Pontiac interiors could easily be improved if they didn't use that hard-ass plastic and everything wasn't so "rounded". It needs more "edge" to it.Dimitrios said:I tend to use "some good" very loosely....
Again, I'm not fighting on performance, quality, etc. here. Yeah, the new goat hauls - happy day.....
I'm arguing on principle - if you use the old car name monikers, you better damn well live up to it. I dunno...maybe I'm just an old school rodder in the end...GM has no shame...
Why can Ford bring the Mustang back to it's roots and still rock it?
Dimitrios said:The Bonneville is just another victim of GM design blunders. But, don't worry...ole' Bob Lutz will revilatize GM with his super duper, antiquated ideas about what car buyers REALLY want in design. He's such a genious, after all....
Some of Bob's brilliance:
Let's import a car from Australia, don't give it any legacy styling queues, cut its' balls off, and call it a GTO! Or....let's make an Impalla SS, but make if FWD and V6, but paint it black and it'll sell goddam it....or let's take a car that used to rock the pavement and make it into the car everyone will want to drive to and from the grocery store - go Malibu..........or, let's make Oldsmobile Alero's and slap a few with 442 decals and call it a "442" edition, but not expect anyone still alive to know what a REAL 442 is.....
Yah!....good job there Bob'o - you deserve that raise...
I'm just waiting for GM mediocrity to seep into Saab....
(I don't want to hear about common vehicle platforms and global/cost leveraging for profitibility - I'm arguing on principle here. If you're going to make cars that "harken back" to the GM legacy, then do it right.....Ford and Daimler-Chrysler at least have the balls to take concept to market and still be true to the "legacy").
girth said:I know exactly what you're saying...but just to play devil's advocate, the old GTO when it was first released was the same way -- just the standard pontiac platform with a big 'ol engine slapped in it. So from that standpoint they did follow the old formula. But I agree, Ford has the right idea in "updating" to the retro look. GM doesn't know WTF it's doing. I have a GM credit card that's maxed out in earnings but there's not a SINGLE GM car that I'm interested in buying other than the vette, which is out of my price range. Pontiac interiors could easily be improved if they didn't use that hard-ass plastic and everything wasn't so "rounded". It needs more "edge" to it.
I wouldn't go that far:Mikey444 said:I can only say 2 things here:
firstly, every single gm car now a days sucks, is but ugly in the interior, exterior or both, and are severely slow and underpowered for the competition.