MSP kills s2000
- Thread starter MazdaSpeedTurbo
- Start date
- Status
MazdaSpeedTurbo
Member
- :
- No Car
dude you ****** retarded i know i beat him.. .were you there??? did you see it happen??? no so stfu... stop trying to be a ***. you have no clue what your talking about wow look how many sites there are... how many different times there are for 1/4 mile oh and if he runs low 14 and a 14.8 100 you must be ****** stupid because if we run 15.1 in ours and a 19 100 foot then he is making up 4 sec on us and there is no ****** way where u getting ur facts??? pullingthem out your ass
This thread is kinda funny and stupid all at the same time. The guy in the S2K probably thought you were a waist of his gas when he had a 3 to 4 car lenght lead and let off. I know I would. He was probably being sarcastic when he said that your car was fast when you thought he was complementing you. The reason why your story is hard to believe is because it is usually the other way around. You would get a jump and the S2K will run you down. Well as long as you consider it a kill that's all that matters......
Dave
Dave
BlueWolfCry
Member
- :
- 02 LX, 03 MSP
yes i agree, if you had fun ok, if no one believes you its alright too, just go race another one on a track rather than the street and then tell us the results
1. End the flaiming now, from everyone its pointless!!MazdaSpeedTurbo said:
2. Lets examine this a bit.
Question:
Is it possible that a MSP can beat a S2000 in the race as described.
Answer:
Yes, however if both drivers knew how to maximas their cars and had no inhibitions from doing, and no mechanical problems limiting perfomance.....then no.
Now it is very possible that a combination of a bad start and not shifting high cost the S2000 the race. After all not everyone can launch a car like that and people not used to it will not be willing to shift only after the car runs into the red line which is insanely high on that car.
Heres another thought. You mentioned you ran with him up to 115 then overtook him after he had a big lead. The problem there is that sounds like he backed off and didn't want to go any higher. After all, that speed is not exactly safe.
By any know perfomance statistics of these cars there is no way for the MSP to overcome that distance without the S2000 giving up or from a MAJOR driver error. Its not a matter of people wanting to be assholes, it simply an impossibility in a true race with no major driver error.
Can we leave it that you ran with an S2000 and hung with him till 115 enough to get props from its driver? That seems to be of the most relavence.
I did the same to a 2003 S2000 60-120 mph. He pulled 1/2 CL from 55-70. After that, its all me. I won by 1/2 cl. I asked the guy if he slowed down and he said no.
Look at the S2000s
0 - 60 : 5.8
14.4 @ 98
8.6 secs to finish quarter mile after it hit 60.
http://honda.jbroadtests.com/S2000/2002/index3.php
Mazdaspeed
0- 60 : 6.5
14.9 @ 93 mph
8.5 secs to finish quarter mile after it hit 60
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0210_mazda/
that .1 secs is about 1 car length going at 120 mph. If i was 1/2 cl behind, this allows me to pull 1/2 cl ahead, which makes me the winner. Look at the facts peopel, I rest my case...
Look at the S2000s
0 - 60 : 5.8
14.4 @ 98
8.6 secs to finish quarter mile after it hit 60.
http://honda.jbroadtests.com/S2000/2002/index3.php
Mazdaspeed
0- 60 : 6.5
14.9 @ 93 mph
8.5 secs to finish quarter mile after it hit 60
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0210_mazda/
that .1 secs is about 1 car length going at 120 mph. If i was 1/2 cl behind, this allows me to pull 1/2 cl ahead, which makes me the winner. Look at the facts peopel, I rest my case...
the MSP is a lot closer to the 1/4 mile mark at 60 mph. according to your times, about 62 feet. doesn't sound like much, but it's over 4 car lengths. so the S2000 travels more than 4 extra car lengths in the same time as the MSP.
i'm not sure how that makes the MSP quicker. (uhm)
but since we're talking about trap speed...what exactly does a 98mph vs. 93mph trap speed mean? it means that the S2000 is pulling away from the MSP at 5mph at that point. so even if the acceleration rates become equal at that point (doubtful), the S2000 continues to pull away at 5mph.
sounds like a ricer fly-by to me.
although, the swearing and name-calling did start to convince me the story might be true. (cool)
i'm not sure how that makes the MSP quicker. (uhm)
but since we're talking about trap speed...what exactly does a 98mph vs. 93mph trap speed mean? it means that the S2000 is pulling away from the MSP at 5mph at that point. so even if the acceleration rates become equal at that point (doubtful), the S2000 continues to pull away at 5mph.
sounds like a ricer fly-by to me.
although, the swearing and name-calling did start to convince me the story might be true. (cool)
MazdaSpeedTurbo
Member
- :
- No Car
i beleive this and i have experienced it.. its all good beleive what u all want but when u actually see it happen you'll be like wtf he was right but until then beleive what you wantnoclue119 said:
MazdaSpeedTurbo
Member
- :
- No Car
if i can find him again i will get it on tape.. i will make him race me from 50 roll and prove myself then i can shove it in all your faces for being the way you are... stuck up fags who think they know everything about cars.Subghetto said:
The only evidence that can back up your claim is a listing of each cars 60-120 numbers. No distance involved. As most that have raced with the same cars will tell you. The S2000 will pull away as it hits it upper range while the protege struggles.
- Status
