Kia-Mazda Collaboration

Really? Hm... Why is Toyota partnered with GM then? To get a bigger marketshare in the US?

Question: Does anyone know what the hell Honda is doing? Why are they selling ugly ass cars that no one is gonna buy? I mean, the Si is dying, the Element is ugly as **** and the only people that buy it are middle-aged women who cant afford a big SUV, not their target 18-24 audience, and the new Accord looks like ass. However, the Acura lineup is ill. What's the deal?
 
because most 18-24 year olds can't afford brand new SUV's, and when you don't have a parent company to lean your back against (thanks Ford ;) ), you have to make BORING EVERYDAY APPLIANCE VEHICLES to pay the bills. To car makers, the enthusiast crowd is tiny compared to the mainstream market, where all the money is.
 
yeah GM partnered with Toyota so they can gain access to Toyota's experience in building top-quality vehicles; in exchange, Toyota gets better US market access.
 
MSPinVA said:
Really? Hm... Why is Toyota partnered with GM then? To get a bigger marketshare in the US?

Question: Does anyone know what the hell Honda is doing? Why are they selling ugly ass cars that no one is gonna buy? I mean, the Si is dying, the Element is ugly as **** and the only people that buy it are middle-aged women who cant afford a big SUV, not their target 18-24 audience, and the new Accord looks like ass. However, the Acura lineup is ill. What's the deal?
Are you really that stupid? The Accord is one of the best selling vehicles ever. Not to mention that it has one of the best reliability records in history. Besides the Toyota Camry, the Accord and the Civic are two of the highest selling import cars ever in history.

Do you have anything else to add?















Moron.(jerkit)
 
Not that that post deserves a response from me, but maybe I did come off a little harsh on Honda, so let me rephrase.

Most of the car companies in the world (BMW, DC, GM, Ford, Mazda, Nissan, and to a lesser extent Kia, Suzuki, Hyundai, Toyota, and Mitsu) have or will go through major overhauls in their product lineup over the next years, or are already in the process. Honda has done nothing of the sort. Sure, they redesigned the Accord, made minor tweaks to the S2000, and made a giant flaming sh*tbox of a Civic Si that is an insult to the nameplate that no one likes, but nothing major. If everything continues as is, the Malibu (no, not a domestic car!!) will outsell the Camry and Accord in the midsize category. All I'm saying is that Honda needs to get with the program and do something, not just sit around and make the same car over and over and over again. Its getting old Honda.....

Better? (jerkit)
 
MSPinVA said:
Then again, Ford does own 50% of Mazda, so it could be Ford beancounters saying "Hey, Mazda guys, you're brilliant.... maybe... uh, give Kia some of your stuff so they don't suck SO bad and we can SELL them!" (Ford also is a majority owner of Kia). BTW, Kia/Hyundai thing is more like Honda/Acura. Same company..... kind of..... but not really.

I think the world really needs to understand that there are only 4 major car companies in the world: FoMoCo, GM, Daimler-Crapsler, er Chrysler, and Volkswagen, and as much as it's hard to swallow, Honda, Nissan, and Toyota really are minor players in the grand scheme of things. Hell, even Toyota is partnered with GM (Corolla/Prism, Vibe/Matrix).
I've read this twice now and I missing your point.

First, Ford only owns 33% of Mazda. I know it has been said already, but your figure is so grossly wrong, the correct one needs to be stated again.

Next up, Toyota has a huge market share in the US. They almost made into the top three manufacturers in the US. Which would have knocked out one of the domestic makers out of the US big three.

Not to mention Toyota is the only company that I have ever heard of that has some where in the ball park of ten billion in liquid assets. I'm not sure on the exact figure, but they could easily fund their Formula One team easily for a couple of seasons on their liquid assets alone.
 
kia sucks so bad... shape is awful, interioir ir appalling.. ewwghhh
 
OK, sorry about the number. I assumed it was 50 percent, considering that's usually when majority stock ownership occurs. Ford does have a big say as to what Mazda does and how it does it, in the US anyway. By the way, as per the Fortune 500 list, GM and Ford are numbers 3 and 4, with $196B and $165B respectively. Toyota made $41.6B, but I do stand corrected

"Last year, Toyota surpassed Ford Motor Co. to become the worlds second largest automaker ranked by global vehicles sold." from detnews.com.

Didn't realize Toyota was so big. Mea culpa. Anyway, what I was trying to say all along is many people fail to realize that its not 20 independent car companies all making their own decisions. It's 5 or 6 major companies that rule and they tell people what to do. So whether its Mazda lending Kia its engines or Pontiac and Toyota sharing platforms, its really Ford and GM who are calling the shots.
 
Just an FYI, Toyota had to redo the numbers and lost that covetted number three spot back to Ford. But not by much...
 
MSPinVA said:
Not that that post deserves a response from me, but maybe I did come off a little harsh on Honda, so let me rephrase.

Most of the car companies in the world (BMW, DC, GM, Ford, Mazda, Nissan, and to a lesser extent Kia, Suzuki, Hyundai, Toyota, and Mitsu) have or will go through major overhauls in their product lineup over the next years, or are already in the process. Honda has done nothing of the sort. Sure, they redesigned the Accord, made minor tweaks to the S2000, and made a giant flaming sh*tbox of a Civic Si that is an insult to the nameplate that no one likes, but nothing major. If everything continues as is, the Malibu (no, not a domestic car!!) will outsell the Camry and Accord in the midsize category. All I'm saying is that Honda needs to get with the program and do something, not just sit around and make the same car over and over and over again. Its getting old Honda.....

Better? (jerkit)
So I guess you work for Motor Trend or Car and Driver? You think you know a lot about auto manufacturers, but you didn't know how big Toyota was?????

This all spells out to me that your opinions are completely worthless here. And if you think that Honda "hasn't gone through major overhauls in their product lineup", then you are doubly stupid. So you hate the Civic SI, so what. I would even consider purchasing that car so I really don't care about it. You probably hate it because they beat you in your gay street races all the time.

Please stop spreading your dumb opinions because they are pointless and don't make sense at all.

You have given no facts in any of your posts yet.

I have. ;)
 
Yet you give no facts telling me why I'm doubly stupid.... Hm.... Too bad I've actually done some research, and if me and just about anyone I talk to says the new si is "ugly", then am I wrong? Sales numbers and reviews don't disagree with me either. And when did street racing come into this, or do you still faithfully watch the fast and the furious everyday?

I'd also like to know how you get that I know nothing and have nothing to contribute to this forum off of 3 posts? You can't disagree that there are 4 major car conglomerates in the world. Where was I wrong? Toyota chooses to go it alone, they have a great lineup, and they have a huge marketshare in Asia and a pretty sizable one in the US. But the point here remains that Toyota goes it alone , and the subject of this post is Kia - Mazda Collaboration , and I mentioned that Ford, since it partially owns Mazda, probably told them to let Kia borrow an engine for US market. How is that wrong, or incorrect, or stupid in any way?
 
Um..I guess none of y'all likes Kia and scared of the Kia-Mazda relationship :)
It seems a little late to add onto this post, but I just want to say a few words..
Well, as a proud Korean guy in this forum..I want you to know that Kia isn't such a bad cars after all.
I know, I know, they aren't that good. I admit that. But..Kia isn't such a cheapass crap company as you all might think..

I want you to understand a few things about korean cars...

Korea started building their first cars sometime after the korean war, which is like mid 50s, and worked their way up to current days.
If you think about it, Europe and America were already driving cars in 19th century, and Japan was capable of making the largest battleship in the world and those bad-ass Zero fighters, that kicked american navy's butt for a quite while, by the start of second world war. Koreans were riding on Cows and Horses when Japanese were sending aircraft carriers halfway around the globe. The gap between Korea and Japan or rest of the "powerful nations" were HUGE, i can tell you that.

The reason Japanese can build such a reliable cars is because they HAD been building machinaries for more than a century. After all, they started a freakin world war against U.S. They had long time to develop their technologies and building skills.
Same goes for American or European cars. Mr. Ford was building his T-series in what, 19th century? I don't even have to say anything about Germans. Porsche, anyone?

Koreans, however, they started to build cars that are worthy of world-market export in less than 50 years. There are only a handful of countries that can export their cars into world market. US, Germany, Italy, Japan, Britain, and maybe the French. Koreans are the only nation in Asia beside Japan who can build cars of enough quality to do such thing.
You don't see Russian-brand Lada cars running around in Chicago or New York,do you? Or have you ever seen a Chinese brand car? Spanish? Indian??

Korean cars are still considered cheap-disposable-appliance cars in north america.
I can very well understand that. And it's mostly still true.

But look at Hyundai for example. They have improved and their quality ratings now rival those of Japanese. Their XG350 for example. Who ever thought anyone would be driving a KOREAN luxury car? but nowadays they do. Their Tiburon, which I admit don't compare to japanese sport coupes, still has pretty nice design, better than average performance and good quality.

In case of Kia, I don't know why, but Kia seems to bring in really basic cheap models into America..they are not like that in Korea. They make some nice and pretty cars there, but in US they are all such a cheapass models. I don't understand why.

But no one can beat the values of Kia..I mean...price for a full-full equipped midsize Kia Sedan would barely make a base model of other cars.
That's exactly why they are cheap cars, but remember not everyone is rich enough to drive a Honda or Toyota or Volks or whatever. People who just need to get from point A to point B and back, but want something that's not 10 years old and have some decent equipments built into, Kia can serve them well enough. For people who wants reasonable quality and performance and good pricing with not-so-ugly designs, Hyundai can perform quite well. Quality-wise, I don't think American makers are that great either. Volkwagen had some huge trouble in quality issues for years when their plant moved to Mexico.

Believe it or not, there is actually a Hyundai luxury model in Korea that's roughly $80,000 US. (Can you imagine a $80,000 Hyundai???) I rode in one of them and they are DAMN nice. Kia also has some upper class models that runs in 60-70k$ range. Some of the cars have a lot better interior and options in Korean domestic market than in US or Canada. Rios and Sephias, they don't look that cheap in Korea, believe me.

Hyundai has enough technology to build Tanks for Korean Army, and it's one of the best 3rd-generation tanks in the world. I am not kidding.

I know you all people here wants to drive something that's as good as Proteges or Civics or Acuras or Lexus, and look down on korean made cars.
I can very well understand it and i don't blame you at all. But, Koreans are improving, and considering they are making cars in such short history, they are not doing that bad.

Give them some more time. They are trying hard to make better cars.
Japanese and Germans had to start from somewhere..right?

And besides, as quality- and performace-oriented drivers you all are, you won't buy them anyway, so what's the big issue? :)
 
very interesting stuff, not that i will ever buy a Kia/Hyndai
I read an artical that said Hyndai had the best initial quality rating in the US on their cars? Must have just been a bunch of fluff to sell them. They said that the KOrean manufactured cars were very well made. I guess initial quality and quality that lasts are two different concepts to them.
 
mineroller said:
Um..I guess none of y'all likes Kia and scared of the Kia-Mazda relationship :)
It seems a little late to add onto this post, but I just want to say a few words..
Well, as a proud Korean guy in this forum..I want you to know that Kia isn't such a bad cars after all.
I know, I know, they aren't that good. I admit that. But..Kia isn't such a cheapass crap company as you all might think..

I want you to understand a few things about korean cars...

Korea started building their first cars sometime after the korean war, which is like mid 50s, and worked their way up to current days.
If you think about it, Europe and America were already driving cars in 19th century, and Japan was capable of making the largest battleship in the world and those bad-ass Zero fighters, that kicked american navy's butt for a quite while, by the start of second world war. Koreans were riding on Cows and Horses when Japanese were sending aircraft carriers halfway around the globe. The gap between Korea and Japan or rest of the "powerful nations" were HUGE, i can tell you that.

The reason Japanese can build such a reliable cars is because they HAD been building machinaries for more than a century. After all, they started a freakin world war against U.S. They had long time to develop their technologies and building skills.
Same goes for American or European cars. Mr. Ford was building his T-series in what, 19th century? I don't even have to say anything about Germans. Porsche, anyone?

Koreans, however, they started to build cars that are worthy of world-market export in less than 50 years. There are only a handful of countries that can export their cars into world market. US, Germany, Italy, Japan, Britain, and maybe the French. Koreans are the only nation in Asia beside Japan who can build cars of enough quality to do such thing.
You don't see Russian-brand Lada cars running around in Chicago or New York,do you? Or have you ever seen a Chinese brand car? Spanish? Indian??

Korean cars are still considered cheap-disposable-appliance cars in north america.
I can very well understand that. And it's mostly still true.

But look at Hyundai for example. They have improved and their quality ratings now rival those of Japanese. Their XG350 for example. Who ever thought anyone would be driving a KOREAN luxury car? but nowadays they do. Their Tiburon, which I admit don't compare to japanese sport coupes, still has pretty nice design, better than average performance and good quality.

In case of Kia, I don't know why, but Kia seems to bring in really basic cheap models into America..they are not like that in Korea. They make some nice and pretty cars there, but in US they are all such a cheapass models. I don't understand why.

But no one can beat the values of Kia..I mean...price for a full-full equipped midsize Kia Sedan would barely make a base model of other cars.
That's exactly why they are cheap cars, but remember not everyone is rich enough to drive a Honda or Toyota or Volks or whatever. People who just need to get from point A to point B and back, but want something that's not 10 years old and have some decent equipments built into, Kia can serve them well enough. For people who wants reasonable quality and performance and good pricing with not-so-ugly designs, Hyundai can perform quite well. Quality-wise, I don't think American makers are that great either. Volkwagen had some huge trouble in quality issues for years when their plant moved to Mexico.

Believe it or not, there is actually a Hyundai luxury model in Korea that's roughly $80,000 US. (Can you imagine a $80,000 Hyundai???) I rode in one of them and they are DAMN nice. Kia also has some upper class models that runs in 60-70k$ range. Some of the cars have a lot better interior and options in Korean domestic market than in US or Canada. Rios and Sephias, they don't look that cheap in Korea, believe me.

Hyundai has enough technology to build Tanks for Korean Army, and it's one of the best 3rd-generation tanks in the world. I am not kidding.

I know you all people here wants to drive something that's as good as Proteges or Civics or Acuras or Lexus, and look down on korean made cars.
I can very well understand it and i don't blame you at all. But, Koreans are improving, and considering they are making cars in such short history, they are not doing that bad.

Give them some more time. They are trying hard to make better cars.
Japanese and Germans had to start from somewhere..right?

And besides, as quality- and performace-oriented drivers you all are, you won't buy them anyway, so what's the big issue? :)

I love my 1998 Kia Sephia. I have had it years and have well over a 100k on it. Only thing I ever had go wrong was a $25 part. If I ever have to buy a new car it will most likely be a Kia. good gas miles, A/C, great warranty ( though I doubt you will ever have to use it!) and great price among other things.
 
Road and Tracks article on the new KIA Spectra
http://roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=6&article_id=1497




I have run the heck out of this car still no major problems

2001 Kia Sephia
front-9-28-04.jpg


side8-04.jpg


ebay1.jpg


momo1.jpg



momo2.jpg


engine1.jpg
 
Back