The skyactiv motor is essentially the Mazda L engine with new pistons, the 4-2-1 manifold, probably a revised cylinder head and direct injection. If you remove the engine cover of the skyactiv and the older 2.5 they are strikingly similar. The block is the same and I highly doubt Mazda tinkered with the bearings specifically for the newer version... thats an uncecessary investment for a brand that doesnt have the money to do that even if they really wanted to.
Just a reminder that there has been zero evidence posted that the 5w-30 would give superior protection in this engine. Just some tin-foil hat theory about CAFE and regional differences. Please base your decisions (in general, not just about oil) on hard evidence, not what random people post online.
Well, the first part of that is conjecture. I'm pretty sure Mazda's engineers know a lot more about the oil requirements of their engines than anyone in this forum.
I think you have the second part backwards. The higher viscosity oil experiences higher shearing forces than the lower viscosity oil, so it should experience more degradation due to shearing. Also, the lower viscosity oil flows through the filter at a higher rate, so it is getting recirculated more often and is staying cleaner. Haven't you noticed that recommended oil change intervals have been increasing even as recommended viscosity is decreasing?
Increasing fuel economy is certainly one motivation for using lower viscosity oil. But so is increasing power and torque. In percentage terms, the power and torque gain is bigger than the fuel economy gain. Even without any CAFE standards to worry about, there are multiple advantages of using a lower viscosity oil, and no real disadvantages if the engine is designed for it. The limiting factor has been engine materials and manufacturing processes. As they've gotten better over the decades, dimensional tolerances have gotten tighter and are more thermally stable, the finished surface roughness of machined surfaces is better controlled, etc., etc. As I mentioned many pages back, with tighter clearances you can support the same loads with thinner films.
Given that Mazda recommends either 0W-20 or 5W-30, I think it's perfectly acceptable to choose 5W-30. I just don't see any technical justification for saying it provides better protection or has any effect on the longevity of the engine.
^2nd that..I will only respond to beer related posts in this thread from here..enjoying Burley Oak homegrown session while visiting the area...
releastically it shouldn’t extend past 20c either.
Ill accept that level of collateral damage via highlighting the fact that your assertions aren't rooted in facts anywhere near enough to support your level of fervor to the extent that we may as well utilize bandwidth discussing our preferred adult beverages. Nothing personal just my opinion based on my own experiences and lack of observed 0w20 fails..unless I'm just missing them.
I mostly see you repeating what you obviously feel pretty strongly about but I (plenty others here also) just have little to no motivation to experiment or see any reason to believe that thicker or moly or aforementioned unicorn jizz essence oil will bring enlightenment to my vehicle or my visceral experiences with it. I am hugely more motivated to give to the victims of harvey flooding.
Funny you say that, because you come in here contradicting my logical theories with NOTHING. Not even your ideas as to why you think 0w20 provides better protection then 5w30. In terms of contribution on this thread, and probably this whole forum you have done absolutely NOTHING. Below is a quote by Red MC, who properly states his opinion about what he thinks regarding this matter. you could either make yourself useful or simply not comment on my thread.