So I got into an argument with some Greek on the phone tonight that calls himself "perv works" or something.
We were talking about displacement.
He said that changing the length of your rods will change your displacement.
I disagreed, and told him that changing rod length would only change compression, and that if you want to change displacement, you'd have to change the BORE or the STROKE of the engine, since Displacement = bore x stroke.
If you think about it, if you make a rod longer, you're not changing the difference between the max and min height of the piston, you're just SHIFTING where it sits.
When you go with a longer stroke, for example, you're changing the difference between the max and min height of the piston...the max height will be HIGHER, and the min height will be LOWER.
Nick and I always get into these arguments, because he is a big jerk.
I couldn't find data to back me up, but I'm pretty sure I'm right. Can anyone find anything credible to prove either one of us wrong?

We were talking about displacement.
He said that changing the length of your rods will change your displacement.
I disagreed, and told him that changing rod length would only change compression, and that if you want to change displacement, you'd have to change the BORE or the STROKE of the engine, since Displacement = bore x stroke.
If you think about it, if you make a rod longer, you're not changing the difference between the max and min height of the piston, you're just SHIFTING where it sits.
When you go with a longer stroke, for example, you're changing the difference between the max and min height of the piston...the max height will be HIGHER, and the min height will be LOWER.
Nick and I always get into these arguments, because he is a big jerk.


I couldn't find data to back me up, but I'm pretty sure I'm right. Can anyone find anything credible to prove either one of us wrong?