chuyler1 said:There are very few amps on the market these days that don't have sufficient on-board crossovers so he shouldn't have to worry about that. For your average system, two amps will almost always cost more than a single multi-channel amp configuration.
Another option, if you can't find a 5-channel amp that you like, is to only power the front speakers and the subwoofer with an external amp. With this configuration you can get by with a 3-channel or 4-channel amp (with 4ch you bridge the rears). A 4x50w amp with the rear channels bridged would give you 2x50 for your front speakers and 1x200 for an 8" subwoofer.
chuyler1 said:FYI: Crutchfield has the Infinity 6-ch for $399. But anyway, to sum things up... KISS. keep it simple stupid. With a 5 or 6 channel amp you have one thing to install and one set of wires to worry about. There are no fuse blocks, extra patch cables, or multiple failure points. One amp plain and simple.
Breeegz said:http://cgi.ebay.com/Xtant-403A-400-...5877701108QQcategoryZ4950QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem.... or you can wire your front speakers to channel 1 and rears to channel 2 and channel 3 to the sub and lose balance controls...
Poseur said:Umm, this also effectively nulls the STEREO part of music. left channel information goes to front and right channel goes to rear meaning that left/right imaging now becomes front/rear. If fidelity means anything, don't do this.
THe suggestion of amping just front and running rears off the deck is the best solution offered. Definately hands down the best option for setup.
Aberration said:Alright so not touching this exchange back to the idea of using a six channel Infinity bridged for fronts and a sub from Chuyler would the speakers getting 148 watts overpower the sub only getting 287?