What octane to use?

:
Mazda 5 GT
I've been using the 'regular' gas on the M5. like '87' . I'm thinking
what will happen if I use the 'middle' '89'?? Is this going to hurt the M5?
 
Actually, a little known fact is that using too high of a octane for too long may also damage your emissions system (catalytic converter). There's no benefit to either gas mileage or performance with using a higher octane.

The brand of gas you use has more of an impact (ie. Shell/Chevron/BP/Exxon vs. Costco/Convenience Store). Yes, all gas comes from the same stock pile, but branded gasoline adds more detergents to keep your engine clean while the bargain brands contain only the minimum EPA requirements to protect the environment.
 
Last edited:
To me it was an under ~USD$20K car so 87 it is. I have used 87 for my old Honda since new and no trouble so far. Now, take Jandree's gas brand comments into consideration if you want to gain some edge.
 
To me it was an under ~USD$20K car so 87 it is. I have used 87 for my old Honda since new and no trouble so far. Now, take Jandree's gas brand comments into consideration if you want to gain some edge.

87 is perfect for this car and anything above 87 would really be a waste of money. Jandree was right about the difference in quality as certain brands (shell, chevron) use better additives although you need to be careful of chevrons that are franchised as they have been known to use "non standard" chervon quality gas. (you'll know what im talking about if you have ever seen a United Oil truck filling up the tanks at a chevron). If i am not mistaken the main difference between 87 and higher octanes is the rate that the gasoline burns (i dont know if it costs more to produce but can only assume it does). The higher the octane the slower it burns and the reason it is used by "higher end" cars is because the slower burn allows the engine to run/sound smoother. Im not a chemist nor an engineer but the above is what i rememered after researching it a few years back. But i did want to correct you on the fact that you said you use it only because the car cost less than 20k. Lets say the manual said that our 5 should use nothing lower than 90 or 91 octane then you should stick to what it says. I had a beemer a while back and since it was older when i purchased it i decided to use 87...well let me tell you that the car wasnt happy at all with it. The engine started to rumble and seemed to be "out of sync", so i immediately switched back and that fixed it. we should always use the octane that the car was engineered to run on.
Have a good weekend guys
 
... we should always use the octane that the car was engineered to run on

Got it. My comment referred to the fact that NEW the Mazda5 costed me less than $20K and 99% of the time brand new cars with that price tag are not designed to use higher than 85 or 87 octanes (I recalled seeing an 85 octanes option in a gas station somewhere).

I agree. I'm sure a 1996 BMW 7 Series could cost me less than $20K nowadays but for sure it will use 93 octanes to say the least (boom06) :D
 
If i am not mistaken the main difference between 87 and higher octanes is the rate that the gasoline burns (i dont know if it costs more to produce but can only assume it does).

This is an extremely common misconception that I, too, used to have. However, there is not a burn rate difference. Higher octane gasoline's higher anti-knock index (octane rating) is a result of the different chemical changes it undergoes during the increasing heat and pressure of the compression stroke. There used to be an absolutely wonderful semi-technical paper on the subject on Chevron's website, but I have not been able to find it for a fair while now. I think it vanished with the site re-design following the Texaco merger.

Either way, 87 is all you need in the 5. In fact, where I live "regular" gas is 85 octane and there is no mpg or performance difference between it and the "mid-grade" 87 here (high altitude).
 
im using octane 92.... supreme plus from chevron... ahahahah burning my wallet but my dad said to not save the few bucks
 
higher octane is for higher compression and boosted engines... and those running aggressive ignition. An a-typical car like ours is fine on 87 and could actually be losing power and gas mileage with higher octane because the fuel ignites later and could cause damage to expensive emissions components as a result.
 
when I say later I'm meaning its not going to ignite as easily as 87 octance would in our cars and it wouldn't burnoff quite as well. Our car's compression, ignition timing, etc are tuned for 87 octane as is recommended. anything much higher wouldn't be beneficial and may actually cause loss of power as I've seen dyno results online of octane testing. Higher octane can resist ignition better than lower octane so the way I see it, it is igniting later on a vehicle not tuned for it... maybe fractions of crank angle but just the same.
 
If you get some time, raspykart, check that FAQ. It's a good read and deals with tons of "common knowledge" that's bandied about in the tuning world that's just flat wrong.
 
85

I'm in Denver. We use 85 octane v. 87 here.

FWIW: I've had Saabs that would choke on low-grade 91 here. Some gas stations appear to be watering down the gas.

You may as well flush money down the toilet if you use higher octane fuel in a stock set-up.

That FAQ link was cornfuzin'
 
im using octane 92.... supreme plus from chevron... ahahahah burning my wallet but my dad said to not save the few bucks

92 octane isnt doing anything positive for your 5. Chevron has good gas no matter which octane. You're better off spending the extra dollar on a lottery ticket :p
 
im now comparing mileages with different grade of fuel
now i have shell bronze (87) in the 5 (cuz shell is nearer to my place)
 
You'll need to use more than one tank before switching. Most tests use 3 tanks of the same grade to get accurate numbers. The ECU will also need time to adjust (if it can).
im now comparing mileages with different grade of fuel
now i have shell bronze (87) in the 5 (cuz shell is nearer to my place)
 
Back