Bennett2043
Member
- :
- Jeep Liberty
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ultimate Kerry Ad.
- Thread starter Bennett2043
- Start date
i dont know why people care about iraq so much.
the country is going down the ****hole and all we can debate about is whats happening in iraq?
i suppose its a good deversion for bush. keep everyone thinking about iraq so we dont have to think about how the country is deteriorating.
the country is going down the ****hole and all we can debate about is whats happening in iraq?
i suppose its a good deversion for bush. keep everyone thinking about iraq so we dont have to think about how the country is deteriorating.
Bennett2043
Member
- :
- Jeep Liberty
Well Iraq and other middleeast countries, are counties where terrorists are harbored. It all goes back to september 11. At the start of the Iraq war our inteligence pointed that Iraq had links with the al qaeda and it still does. I don't understand how you see, Iraq, is a threat to this country as a diversion for bush?!?
For God sake we lost more people September 11 than Pearl Harbor. We have to take action to prevent further tradgies, we cannot wait for the terrorists to attack us again.
For God sake we lost more people September 11 than Pearl Harbor. We have to take action to prevent further tradgies, we cannot wait for the terrorists to attack us again.
DooMer_MP3
Member
Can I ask what the big deal with flip-flopping is? I mean, jesus christ its the logical thing to do when circumstances and previous reasonings turn out to be false!
"Hey, they have Weapons of Mass destruction, they are a threat"
"Well, alright, we should disarm them, because they have weapons of mass destruction"
" Well s***, it turns out it was a mistake, and they didn't have weapons of mass destruction"
"Then the war was a mistake"
I guess I just dont see the big ******* idea. Its a weak cause. Bush has flip-flopped NUMEROUS times as well:
http://flipflops.compassiongate.com/
Its a weak campaign by conservatives that preys on the weak-minded voter. And apparently it is succeeding.
Chris
"Hey, they have Weapons of Mass destruction, they are a threat"
"Well, alright, we should disarm them, because they have weapons of mass destruction"
" Well s***, it turns out it was a mistake, and they didn't have weapons of mass destruction"
"Then the war was a mistake"
I guess I just dont see the big ******* idea. Its a weak cause. Bush has flip-flopped NUMEROUS times as well:
http://flipflops.compassiongate.com/
Its a weak campaign by conservatives that preys on the weak-minded voter. And apparently it is succeeding.
Chris
Last edited:
DROP A 100 KILOTON NUKE AND CALL IT DONE WITH.... just joking.. that would eventually hurt everyone on this planet. Nuclear Holacost is the last answer to anything.
All these big words that I can't spell like Nuclear..hehehe!!!!
I support our troops over there right now. It wasn't their decision but they are there defending that nation under orders of the president. I pray that we don't have that many more casualties, but we will... it's war.. in war people die... it's the nature of the beast.
Semper Fidelis.. come home safe.
All these big words that I can't spell like Nuclear..hehehe!!!!
I support our troops over there right now. It wasn't their decision but they are there defending that nation under orders of the president. I pray that we don't have that many more casualties, but we will... it's war.. in war people die... it's the nature of the beast.
Semper Fidelis.. come home safe.
Bennett2043 said:Well Iraq and other middleeast countries, are counties where terrorists are harbored. It all goes back to september 11. At the start of the Iraq war our inteligence pointed that Iraq had links with the al qaeda and it still does. I don't understand how you see, Iraq, is a threat to this country as a diversion for bush?!?
For God sake we lost more people September 11 than Pearl Harbor. We have to take action to prevent further tradgies, we cannot wait for the terrorists to attack us again.
everyone in the bush camp have now said there was no connection. ALL OF THEM.
so i dont see how you can still think there was.
DooMer_MP3
Member
On the eve of combat against Iraq, 75% of the American people polled *FALSELY* believed that Iraq had connections to 9/11 and/or terrorism... Now its 40%. Apparently you're part of the brainwashed 40%. The link simply DID NOT EXIST.Bennett2043 said:Well Iraq and other middleeast countries, are counties where terrorists are harbored. It all goes back to september 11. At the start of the Iraq war our inteligence pointed that Iraq had links with the al qaeda and it still does. I don't understand how you see, Iraq, is a threat to this country as a diversion for bush?!?
For God sake we lost more people September 11 than Pearl Harbor. We have to take action to prevent further tradgies, we cannot wait for the terrorists to attack us again.
NOW, after destroying that country, yes, there are terrorists everywhere in it. Some flocked there from neighboring countries, some began to hate us due to occupation. The only terrorism WITHIN Iraq today has been created by US BEING THERE.
Its pretty simple, really, and agreed upon by liberals and conservatives alike.
Chris
insanoman2005
Banned
- :
- 2004 Mazda 3s
wow...what a funny (and true) site. Bush supporters are brainwashed meat-heads.
it's the dumb leading the....well dumb.
it's the dumb leading the....well dumb.
stop making political threads
this is like the 10th thread... everyone has voiced their opinons, everyone has argued about it, I dont think ANYONE has changed their minds yet. maybe a few people on the fence have decided, but for God's sake, this madness has to stop. All these threads end up doing, is start arguments and name calling. go drive your cars, talk with your wives, etc.
this is like the 10th thread... everyone has voiced their opinons, everyone has argued about it, I dont think ANYONE has changed their minds yet. maybe a few people on the fence have decided, but for God's sake, this madness has to stop. All these threads end up doing, is start arguments and name calling. go drive your cars, talk with your wives, etc.
Bennett2043
Member
- :
- Jeep Liberty
We had inteligence that iraq had nuclear weapons at the time. Are we supposed to just wait for these weapons to hit us? Iraq was not really a war that we could avoid, well we could, but it would only come back to haunt us.
The difference between the US and Al Queda/Iraq is the USA has morals. These people are nuts, they do as they want, they do not think the same as us thus look at september 11th. We simply cannot say to them, don't do it, because that will never work, like Kerrys plan/approach is for example. If we do not take action against these people, they will hit us, the question is not how, but when. Kerry's approach is to strengthen our defenses to basically to wait for them to hit us. I don't know about you, but I really don't want to be hit-I'd rather go to war to take them down were they live.
Bennett
The difference between the US and Al Queda/Iraq is the USA has morals. These people are nuts, they do as they want, they do not think the same as us thus look at september 11th. We simply cannot say to them, don't do it, because that will never work, like Kerrys plan/approach is for example. If we do not take action against these people, they will hit us, the question is not how, but when. Kerry's approach is to strengthen our defenses to basically to wait for them to hit us. I don't know about you, but I really don't want to be hit-I'd rather go to war to take them down were they live.
Bennett
insanoman2005
Banned
- :
- 2004 Mazda 3s
Bennet, can you show me where Kerry has said he's going to bring everyone home and wait for us to be attacked?
No, you can't. He's going to bring UN in and 90% of our troops out...the way it SHOULD've been. He's going to hunt the TERRORISTS....not the guy his daddy couldn't kill. Big difference....you're brain washed.
No, you can't. He's going to bring UN in and 90% of our troops out...the way it SHOULD've been. He's going to hunt the TERRORISTS....not the guy his daddy couldn't kill. Big difference....you're brain washed.
Bennett2043
Member
- :
- Jeep Liberty
Yeah, he said "his plan" has an end date. You CANNOT put an end date on this type of war. So yes "his plan" calls to bring everyone home.insanoman2005 said:Bennet, can you show me where Kerry has said he's going to bring everyone home and wait for us to be attacked?
No, you can't. He's going to bring UN in and 90% of our troops out...the way it SHOULD've been. He's going to hunt the TERRORISTS....not the guy his daddy couldn't kill. Big difference....you're brain washed.
the UN, ha, good luck with them. They wouldn't help us when we needed them at the start of the war, what makes you think they listen now?
I feel sorry for you that you cannot see the facts.
Bennett
insanoman2005
Banned
- :
- 2004 Mazda 3s
Bennett2043 said:the UN, ha, good luck with them. They wouldn't help us when we needed them at the start of the war, what makes you think they listen now?
Bennett
HAHAHAHA, do you know WHY the UN wouldn't help us at the start of the war?!?!? For starters. W decided to go AGAINST the UN decision, breaking several peace treaties in the process and invade Iraq against the wishes of a majority of the free world.
Secondly, after caturing Saddam the UN OFFERED to help Bush by coming in and controlling the situation and reconstruction....Bush turned them away and said that this was HIS fight....
guess what dude. you should keep your mouth shut. You have no clue what you're talking about.
I suggest maybe www.eat-a-bag-of-dicks.com for you. (enguard)
VOTING FOR BUSH, HE'S DA MAN!!!!
Simple as this, President Bush is a man of moral conviction, decency, and common sense in America. Kerry only seems to be concerned with himself and he changes his position according to the climate at the time. President Bush has the balls to take on any attacker. He knows that if you can have all of the weapons in the world, but if you are afraid to use them, no one is afraid of you. But if you show that you mean business, it's more likely folks will come around quicker. On Iraq, let's look at history here, Hitler may not have been a serious threat to America in 1930. But if America would have attacked Germany in 1930 and de-throned Hitler before he got his ball rolling, this would have scared Japan and the rest of the axis of evil into thinking that America was crazy. Yeah maybe we would have lost a couple thousand soldiers such as we are losing in Iraq today. It is a serious and terrible loss, but we would not have lost over 300,000 American Soldiers in World War II trying to defeat this major threat. So it's this simple take'em out now while they are somewhat weak, or let them grow and make it harder later. I could go on and on why President Bush is the best man for the impeding job. If you want lower taxes, less government, strong national defenses, and moral character in the White House, vote for President Bush. If you want higher taxes, four years of deception, no moral value, and a weak defense strategy, go for Kerry, Osama wants you to.
Simple as this, President Bush is a man of moral conviction, decency, and common sense in America. Kerry only seems to be concerned with himself and he changes his position according to the climate at the time. President Bush has the balls to take on any attacker. He knows that if you can have all of the weapons in the world, but if you are afraid to use them, no one is afraid of you. But if you show that you mean business, it's more likely folks will come around quicker. On Iraq, let's look at history here, Hitler may not have been a serious threat to America in 1930. But if America would have attacked Germany in 1930 and de-throned Hitler before he got his ball rolling, this would have scared Japan and the rest of the axis of evil into thinking that America was crazy. Yeah maybe we would have lost a couple thousand soldiers such as we are losing in Iraq today. It is a serious and terrible loss, but we would not have lost over 300,000 American Soldiers in World War II trying to defeat this major threat. So it's this simple take'em out now while they are somewhat weak, or let them grow and make it harder later. I could go on and on why President Bush is the best man for the impeding job. If you want lower taxes, less government, strong national defenses, and moral character in the White House, vote for President Bush. If you want higher taxes, four years of deception, no moral value, and a weak defense strategy, go for Kerry, Osama wants you to.
insanoman2005
Banned
- :
- 2004 Mazda 3s
your political knowledge blows my mind.....you know everything!!
I especially loved. "Hitler may not have been a threat in the 30's". That's awesome.
Also, this whole "Bush has balls" thing is lame. He's the bully in the school yard. He's bigger and badder than everyone else so instead of listening to his nerdy friends he goes and kicks over rocks looking for problems where they don't exsist. I'd love to go toe-to-toe with him....see how macho he really his.
I especially loved. "Hitler may not have been a threat in the 30's". That's awesome.
Also, this whole "Bush has balls" thing is lame. He's the bully in the school yard. He's bigger and badder than everyone else so instead of listening to his nerdy friends he goes and kicks over rocks looking for problems where they don't exsist. I'd love to go toe-to-toe with him....see how macho he really his.
Bennett2043
Member
- :
- Jeep Liberty
Congratulations! Your stupidity and character really shines.insanoman2005 said:HAHAHAHA, do you know WHY the UN wouldn't help us at the start of the war?!?!? For starters. W decided to go AGAINST the UN decision, breaking several peace treaties in the process and invade Iraq against the wishes of a majority of the free world.
Secondly, after caturing Saddam the UN OFFERED to help Bush by coming in and controlling the situation and reconstruction....Bush turned them away and said that this was HIS fight....
guess what dude. you should keep your mouth shut. You have no clue what you're talking about.
I suggest maybe www.eat-a-bag-of-dicks.com for you. (enguard)
What Bush did was right and it was the right decision for this country. First of all the UN was failing, all the inspectors were removed. Second, if we would have just waited like I believe you are suggesting, well then you are taking a risk of another attack. Thirdly, why would the US let others come in if all we needed was to put the period on the sentence.
I have nothing more to say to you, since it seems to me that it far beyond your capacity. I am not going to argue with you about your opinions vs. facts.
Bennett
New Posts and Comments
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 213
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 5K