mazdaowner123
Member
You can get em for $29k, if you go used you can get em for abot $26k if you look hard.
~brian
~brian
there's no question that he won't keep whichever car he gets past 75KNatey said:There's no question as to which one will be the better car in 150,000 miles or so.
The Acura is flat-out built better. If your objective is to buy a disposable car, then that's a really good train of thought you're using. Personally, when I'm done with my car, I plan on selling it.protegeV said:there's no question that he won't keep whichever car he gets past 75K
at least 95% of people who buy cars like this don't.
If your objective is to get 150K out of a car, u buy a civic or a prius...not a sports car.
aw, poor babyMP503 said:
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX Sedan 4DNatey said:The Acura is flat-out built better. If your objective is to buy a disposable car, then that's a really good train of thought you're using. Personally, when I'm done with my car, I plan on selling it.
EVO= above his price range.Mp5978 said:If the car hit 75K with minimal maintenance then I'm happy. umm I'm surprise no one here said anything about the Evo. oh well
I don't know man. Those numbers could be skewed by its hype still...I know a few in state college with every option are going for under $18,000 with 40,000 miles, even with the factory wheel tire package (plus whatever else that comes with)...protegeV said:2002 Subaru Impreza WRX Sedan 4D
Engine:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] 4-Cyl. 2.0L Turbo[/font]
Trans:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] Manual Trans[/font]
Drive:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] All Wheel Drive[/font]
Mileage:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] 35,000[/font]
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width=450 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=left>Retail Value </TD><TD align=middle>$20,135 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Original MSRP - $23,995
depreciation - $3860
2002 Acura RSX Type S Sport Cpe 2D
Engine:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] 4-Cyl. 2.0L HO VTEC[/font]
Trans:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] 6 Speed Manual[/font]
Drive:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] Front Wheel Drive[/font]
Mileage:[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica] 35,000[/font]
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width=450 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=left>Retail Value </TD><TD align=middle>$19,735
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Original MSRP - $23,170
Deprectiation - $3435
I rest my case...These cars are nearly identical in value...IF you were going to keep the car for 150K miles then the honda driveline would definitely be in better shape, as long as you didnt turbo it...But lets get real, who is going to keep the car for that long. You;d get jsut as much for the subie at 75K as you would for the Ac.
I think we've agreed to disagree. Thanks for knowing its all a matter of opinion and jest, and not taking it personally like people on a few other boards I know of...Natey said:![]()
lmao, one thing's clear. protegev would take a Soobie and I'd take an Acura!![]()
Welcome, you're one of "us" now. (silly)Mp5978 said:Sorry guys, and thanks for voting. But after cafeful consideration my choice of speed is the RSX. The refinement and reliability what my main concern. The turbo and AWD are a nice touch but I can't see myself paying that much for a Subaru. And the crappy cup holder position isn't helping at all. Well, hopfully the 05 RSX will get some power increase....it's going to be weird driving a car that everyone has... (silly)
someone say something bout cupholders?Mp5978 said:Sorry guys, and thanks for voting. But after cafeful consideration my choice of speed is the RSX. The refinement and reliability what my main concern. The turbo and AWD are a nice touch but I can't see myself paying that much for a Subaru. And the crappy cup holder position isn't helping at all. Well, hopfully the 05 RSX will get some power increase....it's going to be weird driving a car that everyone has... (silly)