Pros and Cons of Toga Bearings versus Stock Bearings

Topline makes cheaper bearings. You can buy them from the same site and they are supposed to be stock spec.
 
mx3ownzj00 said:
It'll be interesting to see how everyone's motor holds up with the differnt combos of parts but tons of boost :)

You will never know. I don't think it makes a Rats-Ass.
 
Brian MP5T said:
You will never know. I don't think it makes a Rats-Ass.
Actually, it makes a hell of a difference what your motor has when you push it that high. You have to be very careful with the tolerances because all imperfections are compounded at high speed and power.
 
I can vouch for the TOGA's accuracy in size. I just plastigauged my mains and they were picture perfect (between .0020" and .0022")
 
bottom end is done, the head is on but not torqued. water pump, oil pump, front and rear main seals, done.
 
I'll copy/paste the info since most prolly won't click to read it:

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Trimetal or Aluminum Bimetal Bearings?[/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]There is a lot more at stake than a few pennies price difference. The right bearing choice can significantly improve your rebuild success rate.[/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]In the real world, building engines for the aftermarket takes place is less than perfect environment. Chances are you're working on a variety of power plants that have operated under a broad range of conditions. An original equipment manufacturer; on the other hand, assembles new engines which are all the same from uniform new parts in a pristine plant. You just don't have those advantages! No matter how clean the shop and excellent the technicians, you still can use all the forgiveness you can get from your bearings. A close look at aluminum bimetal versus cast copper/lead Trimetal leads to only one conclusion. Aluminum may work well for OEM builders, but Trimetal is the sensible choice for the aftermarket.[/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Babbitt, a tin or lead based alloy with varying amounts of antimony, copper or arsenic, is the original and still the best bearing material available. It has great seizure resistance, embedability to trap destructive abrasive particles, good corrosion resistance and conformability to assure good fit. So why use anything else?[/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]With all this going for it, babbitt has one problem. It lacks fatigue strength. It breaks down under load. The common solution is to apply a thin layer of babbitt over a supporting layer of stronger material.[/font]

<table align="left" border="0" width="150"> <tbody><tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="150">[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][/font]</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="100%">[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Figure 1[/font]</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]A look at figure 1 points out an interesting characteristic of babbitt. As the graph shows, the durability of babbit greatly increases as the material decreases in thickness. This seeming contradiction is due to the greater support provided by the backing material. Simply put, the less babbitt, the fewer the problems with fatigue and deterioration. [/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]In order to maximize its durability, the babbitt must be kept to the range of .001" or less.[/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Cast copper/lead alloys, while still forgiving, make much stronger bearing materials than aluminum or babbitt.[/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]By combining the surface properties of a babbitt overlay with the strength of cast copper/lead, the best overall combination of properties is provided in a single composite. <table align="right" border="0" width="150"> <tbody><tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="150"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="100%">[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Figure 2[/font]</td> </tr> </tbody></table> [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font][/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]As shown in figure 2, Trimetal consists of a strong steel shell lined with this cast copper/lead, babbitt composite.[/font][/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font][/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]This combination has many attractive aftermarket attributes: [/font][/font]



  • [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]
    [*]Conformability to adjust for less than perfect tolerances and geometry
    [*]Durability to assure long life
    [*]Embedability to trap abrasive particles
    [*]The best bearing surface to minimize friction and heat generation
    [/font]
    [/font]
[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] Leave off the babbitt coating, and there is no embedability to trap abrasive foreign particles which can mean big trouble. <table align="left" border="0" width="150"> <tbody><tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="150"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="100%">[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Figure 3[/font]</td> </tr> </tbody></table> [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font][/font][/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Leave that copper/lead cushioning layer out, as in an aluminum bimetal bearing, and you have a very unforgiving product. A slight misalignment or tolerance variation can quickly lead to failure.[/font][/font][/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] [/font][/font][/font] [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]The obvious questions seems to be why would anyone pick aluminum bimetal? Only one reason, under the carefully controlled contamination and tolerance conditions of mass production, OEMs are able to gain an incremental cost reduction.[/font][/font][/font]

[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial][font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] <table align="right" border="0" width="150"> <tbody><tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="150"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" valign="middle" width="100%">[font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial]Figure 4[/font]</td> </tr> </tbody></table> [font=Geneva,Verdana,Arial] As shown in figure 4, the actual construction of a Trimetal bearing is a bit more complex. A nickel barrier plating prevents interaction between the babbitt and copper/lead. Flash lead/tin plating protects and provides a cosmetically more attractive finish.

What all this means to an engine rebuilder is that Trimetal bearings, products such as those found in the Clevite 77 line, will provide the conformability, durability, embedability and forgiveness required in aftermarket conditions. In fact, Clevite Engine Parts supplies over 90% of its aftermarket bearings in this Trimetal configuration.

Years of fine-tuning the complex variables in this product have maximized its performance to the point where there is no better choice for the engine builder who is serious about his work and reputation.

[/font]
[/font]
[/font]
[/font]
 
I agree with the fact that they (TOGA) are probably very concerned with accuracy as it's their main selling point "Race Parts" however, this part itself has to be made to such high tolerances that I think they will all perform within a very tight margin.

What I meant to say is that, it is good to research every aspect of the engine rebuild and make the best choices with every part. Some desisions are more crucial than others, such as, timing, managemnt, block work, head work.

Glad to hear that everyone is happy with their desions, If I lived i the states I might Have gotten TOGA or Not. Like I said, I don't think this desion is a really a big deal.
 
the pics are pretty normal, except everything is nice and clean. nothing out of the ordinary, except for how shiny the pistons are.
 
duane, i clicked :p

and whats the status on ur car? (detAils would hElp Me greatly)
pm me if necessary :D
 
RyanJayG said:
the pics are pretty normal, except everything is nice and clean. nothing out of the ordinary, except for how shiny the pistons are.
meh
i need eye candy and something to look forward to :D

also, we did get the same HG right? didnt you say there was some minor difference from stock?
 
yes, the Top Line Head gasket is slightly different in the coolant passage openings... nothing major... I mostly got it because I was planning on upgrading to the Cometic when they became available... but who knows when that will be...
 
RyanJayG said:
yes, the Top Line Head gasket is slightly different in the coolant passage openings... nothing major... I mostly got it because I was planning on upgrading to the Cometic when they became available... but who knows when that will be...
The passages are bigger!
 

New Threads and Articles

Back