New Intake Manifold Out Today

Aricjm15 said:
ff_1_b.jpg
?

where did you find this pic?

is it on a us fsde?

-B
 
found it on ebay, its from a 93-95 626. dont know if it is US spec or not though, but I can get a pic from the mazda parts program when I go to work.
 
This is an awesome product that Cullen has been working on for months guys, if it did not make any worthy power gains what would be the point of putting it out on the market. I for one and getting one since he has been excited about it for months. On a turbo car, this makes sense especially since our turbo is so small and spools so quick who cars about down low, you will always have low end torque. Better to have straight runners and not hurt potential airflow than to have the stupid dual tiny runners that just restrict airflow especially for turbos. All about airflow gentleman (and ladies), so give it a chance, I for one will be putting one in my car and I live in the SoCal area. I have alot of stuff on my car and I let other Mazdaspeeders drive my car to get a taste of what putting the best stuff on your car is all about and how you can have more fun with more power. =)

It makes sense to question the power rating of course, the dyno sheets are there and the conditions were laid out that it was basically hot, this is in Florida so remember its humid and hot especially in August time.... Keep that in mind. Just keep an open mind rather than just writing it off that it doesn't make power because it's "new and different". And I understand the argument that of getting the most bang for the buck for power. I would say this and a turboback and like golden pieces on freeing up the power that the car should have made in the first place from the factory.

Just my 2 cents...
 
8hp loss at 4400 rpm, though there is more torque. There is 3 months between those runs. Looks like some different smoothing was used on the results. The gaps in that last graph are kinda strange too. Too bad they didn't start a bit lower rpm..
 
anarchistchiken said:
It's unfortunate that Cullen has an asshole like you representing him. Having said that, I'll answer your question.

People on this forum are so sinical and questioning of new products for a number of reasons. First, and most importantly, most people on here don't have tons of cash to throw away on random mods, so they want to know that what they're going to invest in is worth it. The fact that they have people like you yelling nearly incomprehensible insults and claims of your hp at them doesnt help build their confidence.

You just don't make a lot of sense. You're saying "As far as HP I can beat the fuk out of civics oh and 1.8t vw's" WHAT?! Why would you put a civic and a 1.8t in the same catagory? And who gives a rat's ass if you have more hp than a stock 1.8t? I gaurentee you if the guy in the VW had invested an equal ammount of money into his car, he would bake your ass all day long.



One more thing that bothered me in your mind numbing rant...
"It is N/A and let me tell you it is worth the money. On a N/A engine the engine growls and it is a awesome sound"
So you claim your car is NA? Even though your name indicates that it's a turbo and you claimed the engine was heat soaked during the dyno? Doesn't it usually take a lot more than a 100 degree ambient temperature to heak soak an NA car that's siting still?

Anyway, I'll be keeping an eye on this to see what the results are from a real dyno.

If this is who I think it is...he is very respectable.

No one touches my car at mazda except for him. Talk to anyone in Orlando and they will tell you this guy is the only one that should touch your mazda.

AS for a better offical dyno im sure it will be out. Cullen is a bit occupied these days. All I have to say if you are skeptical or have questions call him. He will take his time to talk to you.

BTW for those that went with cullen to the dyno where did he get it dynoed at? CFT? Titan? Aerocomp?
 
Last edited:
Back