K&N result above was actually the 3rd run today. 1st run posted 252whp and 277wtq. 2nd run heat soaked and numbers were way down. Gave it a break then results of 3rd run posted above. Not sure if ECU, operator, or intake intake itself caused that small dip but I don't think that loss is 100lbs unless you're comparing Cobb to K&N graph. If so then yes since peak is at different points of powerband. One thing for sure is peak torque is higher in powerband for K&N than Cobb. K&N peak torque at 4400rpm is actually close to where stock(green graph) peaks as well.
Last edited: