Bigg Tim said:yeah but he had his timing off on his car already, so that's why he had so much out. .
??????????????????????????????????? What do you mean?
Bigg Tim said:yeah but he had his timing off on his car already, so that's why he had so much out. .
LinuxRacr told me that the timing was set a few degree's off what stock whould be, I don't know which way though. His tuner was having problem tuning the Haltech until he found that. It's all fixed and running good now.MPNick said:??????????????????????????????????? What do you mean?
JDM Sam said:I was talking about when linux had the MPI. He had #s in the -20 & under in the 8x16 alone with nothing in the 1x8 boost retard column. Could he have lowered the #s with #s in the 8x16 with #s in the 1x8? Yes, he could, but the stock mp3 ecu has timing advanced up to 63 at certain RPM ranges and he had the MPI set up a bunch of diff ways. But, each car is different and not all maps work with other cars. When measuring actual degrees of timing these cars like timing advanced in the low to mid 20s when in boost.
KzA said:Should I 1.00 down the Fuel Amp column too?
KzA said:???
I dont really know what this colum does..Does it basically multiply the map for the different load conditions?