Yes finally. Mango will sleep much better tonight.![]()
Dunno about that, but Mango and I will certainly commute much safer day OR night than you 2017 owners in your less sporty and more unsafe but "seems more mature" vehicles![]()
Hahahah.
Yup.
And what's funny is that schmuck Dave Coleman had the audacity try and compare the CX-5 to a Lexus, Mercedes and Audi? It can't even beat a 'box on wheels/appliance' CRV. Hell it's debatable whether it's even better than the previous generation. They need to stay in their lane and go back to making cars that appeal to enthusiasts/sports car guys and not try and compete with the premium, practical automotive brands.
What would make the front passenger go from 5 stars to 3 stars? That's what Mazda did to 2016 CX-5 seemly nothing had changed on chassis.What would make the front passenger go from 3 stars to 5 stars?
Nah bro, people want that little "jerk" as their vehicle interrupts power application to the pavement and then violently continues it, while their transmission shifts, "because it feels good" and they trust it as a more durable solution. Never mind the violent "bang" that people report when it happens sometimes 2 gears at a time. It totally offers that over the CR-V. Totally.
Not attacking, but i'm just curious as to why you care so much that us 2017 owners are happy with our cars? It seems as though you enjoy attacking everything about the 2017 and I can't understand why if the people who actually OWN the car really enjoy it. Are you mad that we like it, or are you angry at Mazda for making it a certain way, or do you feel like someone owes you a cookie? I think the 2017 owners wants to know. All i'm asking is for a mutual respect for my fellow '17 owners. We're all here because we own Mazda's. We're not here to compete with anyone. On paper this car stinks and I wouldn't have considered it. In the real world it's a fantastic non-sports car that can fit my road bike in the trunk.
Just so you know, the reason why I wrote that post is to point out that your posts (even when hidden) really rub people the wrong way. Imagine how you would feel if we all trashed your 2005 Mazda 3 over and over and over even though you were with your fellow 2005 Mazda 3 owners. We all come here to relax and have grown up conversations with our fellow owners. Yes, the CRV is a nice car, but it's okay if not everyone on the planet owns one. Imagine if Samsung were the only company you were able to buy a cellphone from because some reviewers (who get paid) tell you it's the best, even though I know that Touchwiz is pure garbage (sorry for the TW reference).
omfg dude really? what next a Z06 w/CVT standard to save a few sips of fuel? You can be a traitor and trash your car and/or Mazda that's lost its way per your wisdom all you want but honestly now you're just being a dbag.
omfg dude really? what next a Z06 w/CVT standard to save a few sips of fuel? You can be a traitor and trash your car and/or Mazda that's lost its way per your wisdom all you want but honestly now you're just being a dbag.
Nah bro, people want that little "jerk" as their vehicle interrupts power application to the pavement and then violently continues it, while their transmission shifts, "because it feels good" and they trust it as a more durable solution. Never mind the violent "bang" that people report when it happens sometimes 2 gears at a time. It totally offers that over the CR-V. Totally.
Just add to the ignore list. They will all go away...Honestly, when Uno said he shops at night and does not like people, it all makes sense to me...
If people don't like their cars, their house, their partners, they should move on. Really. Find something to make you happy. Posting whinny things on a mazda board can't really make anyone happy.
And honestly, why such a fuss about one review. So a mag likes the CR-V more than the CX-5. So, who cares? Buy what you like.
Apparently you missed my posts about issues on many 2016 CX-5 trannies. The best auto tranny? Yes, as long as it doesn't break!My thoughts exactly.
I m not a true Fanboi - you can call me a tester and I have reservations about the Windshield and EPA 33 for my 16.5 - I know what and where to praise it as well. Not too long ago - I mentioned that Skyactiv's are some of the best Trannies under 60K USD. I think Uno agreed but the whole swinging your opinions wildly to get under few people's skin is not classy.
Apparently you missed my posts about issues on many 2016 CX-5 trannies. The best auto tranny? Yes, as long as it doesn't break!
Apparently you missed my posts about issues on many 2016 CX-5 trannies. The best auto tranny? Yes, as long as it doesn't break!
Apparently you missed my posts about issues on many 2016 CX-5 trannies. The best auto tranny? Yes, as long as it doesn't break!
omfg dude really? what next a Z06 w/CVT standard to save a few sips of fuel? You can be a traitor and trash your car and/or Mazda that's lost its way per your wisdom all you want but honestly and with all due respect (thanks Ricky Bobby) now you're just being a dbag.
We've been asking this question for months. Good luck getting an answer. Mango's only posts are where he can trash on Mazda and CX-5's. I've never seen another kind of post from him, ever.
Congrats Mango, you win. We all ****** up and bought the wrong car. (Is that why you show up to specifically trash Mazda at every turn and is that what you want to hear?)
Anyway, aside from Uno, everyone can be happy with our CX-5's, Mango, you can be happy with your CR-V. Live and let live.
Just add to the ignore list. They will all go away...Honestly, when Uno said he shops at night and does not like people, it all makes sense to me...
If people don't like their cars, their house, their partners, they should move on. Really. Find something to make you happy. Posting whinny things on a mazda board can't really make anyone happy.
And honestly, why such a fuss about one review. So a mag likes the CR-V more than the CX-5. So, who cares? Buy what you like.