Gee I didn't think the thread title was implying one is better than the other.
NA is by far the winner on lowest cost of ownership.
Turbo is the winner on performance and more fun to drive.
Folks break both NA and turbos. It is possible the turbos attract more drivers who run their cars harder. It's like comparing a Dodge Hell Cat Callenger to a Dodge V6 Challenger. Most Hell Cat owners bought them for the performance and do just that. Some don't even get very far from the dealership before the wreck them.
I'm into maintaining my vehicles. DIY oil chages is half of the oil change shops. DIY plug changes is even a bigger savings. In my case maintenance cost is a wash.
I knew going in the turbo deprciates more than NA. We keep out cars about 15 years. I'll get the difference in enjoyment out of the turbo.
The turbo has larger front brakes. It should stop quicker and the brakes last longer if both are driven the same. The trans is has upgraded clutches, same deal, it will last longer.
The turbo air filter element is larger than the NA. It has better filtration, will last longer and protect the engine better.
The turbo replaced our slug of a car, 09 Accord. I didnt want a different car. I had tuned this car and it was fun to drive. But if we were up grading, then we upgraded to a turbo I could tune. I have no regrets.
Since the OP didn't define what is better, then I say both are better for different reasons.
My plan, be happy and enjoy!
