So the problem is the FL-22 coolant from factory, not the heater core itself. Based on the latest TSB posted above, you won’t escape this potential problem unless your CX-5 isn’t in the stated range. Looks like we‘d better flush out our factory FL-22 coolant earlier than scheduled 120,000 miles / 10 years with new formulation OEM FL-22 coolant.⋯ Still hope mine never needs changing though.
The write-ups I’ve seen have never mentioned the need to disconnect AC lines during heater core replacement like the Mazda Workshop Manual stated?If you decide to undertake heater core replacement be prepared to perform a refrigerant recovery and charge system after reinstalling everything.
If your replacement OEM FL-22 coolant is newer than Apr. 1, 2019, you may be fine but the replacement schedule is now 60,000 miles / 5 years.Seeing how invasive this swap is I guess I’m glad I’ve done a couple coolant services at this point and didn’t rely on the long life service intervals. Nothing certain though I won’t have a failure of heater core or radiator in the future though.
My coolant was changed at the 6+ year mark (summer of 2020 -- used Zerex Asian ). Coolant looked great. Contemplating using FL22 this time.Take a look again at that thread.. many mentions of disconnecting the AC.
My original coolant was drained during the rear main seal repair in 1/2019 and then I replaced mine again in 2/2023.
I definitely will be doing this re-crimp option if the issue ever arises.
Thanks for the heads up.So the problem is the FL-22 coolant from factory, not the heater core itself. Based on the latest TSB posted above, you won’t escape this potential problem unless your CX-5 isn’t in the stated range. Looks like we‘d better flush out our factory FL-22 coolant earlier than scheduled 120,000 miles / 10 years with new formulation OEM FL-22 coolant.
2013-2019 CX-5 vehicles with VINs lower than JM3 KF ****** 605884 (produced before Apr. 1, 2019)
⋯
NOTE:
To solve this concern, two mass production changes have been implemented.
a) The concentration of the coolant has been increased so that the amount of the contained anti-rust additive is higher.
b) The composition of the coolant has been changed (the ratio of the anti-rust additive has increased).
SUBJECT VIN RANGE do not have mass production change implemented.
After reading about the 2 coolant temperature sensors and their relation to the heater core, this afternoon I decided to see if my semi- cheap (~$50) code scanner had the option to display both. Well it does, in *F (not voltage) as ECT1(engine temp) and ECT2 (heater core outlet temp). The car was sitting for hours after being used this morning so wasn't totally cold and it was 80* outside. After running a few minutes the ECT1 was 142*F and ECT2 was 139*F. Then , with heat position selected I turned the fan on HI and in less than a minute the ECT2 dropped to 128-129 thus giving the expected temperature drop as heat is removed from the coolant as designed. I then turned the fan OFF and the ECT2 slowly increased to almost match ECT1 again.Thanks!
Great video find!!! Good to know if I ever run into this issue.
I’d be surprised if FORScan or OBDLink can’t see those temp sensors. I’ll have to check on mine.. never had a reason to query the one by firewall before.
Amazing.. I hadn't read into the implication of the TSB as the coolant formulation in and of itself as the culprit. So for the trivial 2 gallons of coolant replacement that could have been done much earlier, owners are faced with $3000 repair of the heater core because of the factory build coolant damage? Wow!! Is there something other than iron and oxygen exposed to the coolant that is producing rust? I ask AI and need iron, oxygen and water for rust but can get it when iron is exposed to chloride without oxygen.So the problem is the FL-22 coolant from factory, not the heater core itself. Based on the latest TSB posted above, you won’t escape this potential problem unless your CX-5 isn’t in the stated range. Looks like we‘d better flush out our factory FL-22 coolant earlier than scheduled 120,000 miles / 10 years with new formulation OEM FL-22 coolant.
2013-2019 CX-5 vehicles with VINs lower than JM3 KF ****** 605884 (produced before Apr. 1, 2019)
⋯
NOTE:
To solve this concern, two mass production changes have been implemented.
a) The concentration of the coolant has been increased so that the amount of the contained anti-rust additive is higher.
b) The composition of the coolant has been changed (the ratio of the anti-rust additive has increased).
SUBJECT VIN RANGE do not have mass production change implemented.
Mazda dealers can always order the OEM parts for you and they usually arrive within a day. There’re 2 parts (cable / shaft) related to different power seat problems. Mazda OEM part #, TK81-88-0D1, is the long cable which need to get replaced when the seat is making noise during forward / backward movement because it vibrates. The short cable / shaft which isn’t available from Mazda is for the problem when the seat only moves forward / backward on the right side rail because it’s broken.⋯ Unrelated I tried tackling the the well known power seat vibration noise cable under the driver seat. In similar stories seen..take the whole seat apart, etc..phoey.. my hands small enough short of scraping finger on sharp metal, raised the seat all the way up and was able to pull that cable out of the tray. None of the dealerships close by had the cable part in stock. I lubricated that cable sleeve before putting it back together which was a bit more challenging to align back into the drive sockets but snaped back in the mounts and the noise was still there, so I will try that fix again with a new cable to order yet. It's a curious phenomenon that noise and vibration arrives out of that cable. Seat works otherwise fine despite the screeching noise. For the high points that Mazda delivers.. there's a few weak spots here, nothing is perfect.
Update: I found a perfect flexible short (50 mm) shaft for $9 including shipping from China on AliExpress. It took only 11 days from order to delivery. See photo below.
The solid shaft sold on Amazon for $25 is a ripoff. At Home Depot, you can get 1/8" square key stock 12 inches long for $2 - enough to make 6 shafts.
Everbilt 1/8 in. x 12 in. Zinc Key Stock 800307 - The Home Depot
A square shaped solid metal bar, Crown Bolt's square bar is the alternative to the round bar stock. Typically used for framework, gym equipment and awnings. Available in various sizes and materials. Squarewww.homedepot.com
As I mentioned above, I think the solid shaft is a bad idea. If the seat jams, then the shaft will not break and something more expensive will fail, like the motor or the gear drive.
Hope this is helpful to someone.
View attachment 323667
Hey guys. The short cable/shaft is available on AliExpress.
1pc Electric Seat Flexible Shaft Front Rear Seat Motor Drive Shaft with Flocking Refit Maintenance Parts - AliExpress 34
Smarter Shopping, Better Living! Aliexpress.coma.aliexpress.com
I've just ordered it, hope it will fit. Ordered 50mm.
This Valvoline Zerex coolant for “Asian vehicles” can’t be used on Toyota’s?There is actually an earlier 2016 TSB
View attachment 328543
I’m just using Zerex Asian in mine.. considering the revelation that the FL22 may have contributed to issue I’m feeling even better about it now.
View attachment 328544
Restated.. if action was taken as early as 2016 one year after purchase, would that have otherwise prevented what was determined to be the cause attributed to the poor formula of FL-22 at the time? I guess from that post it wasn't yet determined the formula was bad. The VINs span as much as 6 years for the CX-5. Other than TSB post stating up to April 1, 2019 build what day did Mazda actually change the coolant formula on the factory floor? My conspiracy is rather than flush millions of gallons of spoiled coolant or find someway to fix the mix depending on when the discovery occurred, used up what was available otherwise risk production line stopped. Deal with it later.There is actually an earlier 2016 TSB
View attachment 328543
I’m just using Zerex Asian in mine.. considering the revelation that the FL22 may have contributed to issue I’m feeling even better about it now.
View attachment 328544
This Valvoline Zerex coolant for “Asian vehicles” can’t be used on Toyota’s?
Since Mazda engines don’t have engine block coolant drain plug, they can’t do complete coolant drain easily. I hate to mix old FL-22 coolant with fresh Zerex Asian coolant, where we’ll never know what kind of chemical reaction would happen. Like we don’t want mix any ATF with Mazda ATF FZ when we do the ATF drain & fill.
Restated.. if action was taken as early as 2016 one year after purchase, would that have otherwise prevented what was determined to be the cause attributed to the poor formula of FL-22 at the time? I guess from that post it wasn't yet determined the formula was bad. The VINs span as much as 6 years for the CX-5. Other than TSB post stating up to April 1, 2019 build what day did Mazda actually change the coolant formula on the factory floor? My conspiracy is rather than flush millions of gallons of spoiled coolant or find someway to fix the mix depending on when the discovery occurred, used up what was available otherwise risk production line stopped. Deal with it later.
In mom's case it's more like the customer depends on the dealer to proactively address the TSBs. Had the failure occurred in 2016, I think it would have been a warranty solution.
Part of me wonders if this is just masking a larger design issue with the cooling system and how it is maintained for Mazda. Not that other brands don't have other sorts of issues. At the time this wasn't known. This CX-5 was up against the Subaru Forrester. The Subaru had a lot of news at the time of the high oil consumption, foils and frustrations for customers, and determined some bad run of engines, but that problem showed up pretty quickly after purchase.
Thanks for the label picture of the 4 makes as such compatible with the questionable coolant formula, how much of that is shared among them? I'll take them off the list of future vehicle replacements. There's a reason why Toyota doesn't use this formula? I did get some feedback from a mechanic on what was different with Toyota coolant.
Fair. But I have a sense of reaction from call to a dealership this is well known the way the call went immediately to the source without hesitation. Other dealership had one ready on the shelf. The expanse of the TSB looks wide across all models and years listed. Indeed, as shared, this maint needs more attention than follow of manuf. schedule, I'm learning this lesson too late. The feedback here is good and that is very clear to me now. The maint minder for the oil was always followed. It's about 9 years old with 55,400miles. I don't think coolant maint carries to the same attention as the oil changes at it should.Just for a little background on what I have seen
I’ve been here since the summer of 2014 and this has not been a common problem on the CX-5’s of owners here.
There are lots of conspiracy theories on Toyota coolant as well when they went to the long life pink. I treat is as old school coolant and do drain and fills every 2-3 years.