CPE performance upgrades

Mazda3 said:
If the wife could or would drive standard I would have bought a Mazdaspeed 6. I love this CX-7, but definately would be driving the Speed 6 if I could.

With the proper adjustments to A/F, timing, boost, shift points, and shift crispness there are still some decent gains to be had here. I'm confident CPE will get us the best combination within the current set-up.
Well if I could convince my wife to have a car, we would be buying a white 06 STi. She doesn't want a car so the CX-7 is the way to go for us.

I would think a shift kit would help a ton with crisper shifts and a more sportier feel with the autostick. Reducing the lag at low rpm's, crisper shifts, and better gas mileage and this thing would be a very very high score in my book. It would be perfect with a manual tranny and 100hp more! haha
 
Curious if you've ever experimented w/ the stock 2 port bleeder type boost control solenoid? This sort of setup is not the best for eliminating boost taper (as I done extensive experimentation on my evo). If you have the ability to control boost control via the ecu, then moving to an interrupt 3-port type bcs would gain spool as well as help eliminate a lot of the top end taper, even more so then any mbc.
 
S_T said:
Curious if you've ever experimented w/ the stock 2 port bleeder type boost control solenoid? This sort of setup is not the best for eliminating boost taper (as I done extensive experimentation on my evo). If you have the ability to control boost control via the ecu, then moving to an interrupt 3-port type bcs would gain spool as well as help eliminate a lot of the top end taper, even more so then any mbc.


The honest answer at this point is that we just don't know. All three cars (the SPEED3, 6, CX7) all have the same engines, but the turbo is restricted in some way on the CX7. It sounds like in the case of the EVO, the stock boost management left a lot to be desired because it couldn't properly control the wastegate. I don't think we have that problem in our case however, and here's why:

176598.jpg


176599.jpg


If you look back at these graphs, you can see that the wastegate is fully shut (250 indicates the wastegate solenoid is in the closed position) but the boost still tapers off after about 4000rpm. This tells me that the turbo doesn't have enough exhaust energy to continue spinning up, and if we could hook a turbo tach onto the shaft of the turbo, you'd probably see a drop in shaft speed despite the wastegate being totally closed. If the boost control was at fault, then you should see a corresponding increase in boost pressure when the wastegate solenoid finally does open (which would open the wastegate).

We're actually getting a SPEED6 back in our shop here shortly and we're going to look into making a new tubular exhaust manifold for all the turbo MZR equipped vehicles. We're hoping that the restriction is in the exhaust manifold on the CX7 and not in the turbo housing itself. But we're going to investigate the issue and see if we can come up with some kind of solution. I'll keep you guys posted!


Jordan
 
benben84 said:
geez, you are making me feel dumb!! haha Good work!


Not at all my intention, but thanks for the compliment!! If there's anything that I've said above that you don't understand, please feel free to ask me about it. I'll be happy to go into more detail if you're curious about something in particular.


Jordan
 
You guys understand that it is a different turbo in the CX-7 right?

By the way I PMed you last week and didn't get a reply.
 
I think they know, they are just trying to figure out why the boost drops so much at higher RPM's versus the MS versions. According to Mazda, "The refined area of the turbine inlet port enhances throttle response at low rpm and diminishes boost lag." Might also be the problem at higher engine revs.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for that bit of info. I did not know regardless of searching. How about what size the turbo is? What kind?
 
The throttle position drops off towards redline. Assuming the pedal is floored the whole way, then the ECU is pulling back on the e-throttle. The answer may be tuning the ECU control of the throttle.
 
jestermsp said:
a good mbc whould not help stabilize boost at high rpm?
A MBC is so easy to install, I'm surprised CPE or someone else hasn't tried it yet. One would need to install a good boost gauge 1st. Also, air fuel should be monitored, since I'm not certain that the fuel system will accommodate additional boost at high rpm.
 
A boost controller is not going to make an impact in this case (I don't think). If the turbo is pushing as hard as it can, but can't get enough air to maintain boost, then a boost controller isn't going to do anything (at WOT). They already said that the wastegate was fully closed as pressure began to drop. I wonder if that is the speed govener kicking in that is causing the throttle position to get funny on that graph(?).

In any case, I think that CPE has the right idea. If it winds up being the turbo inlet that is the limiting factor, I wonder if porting would be an option too...
 
I hope this gets figured out very soon! I haven't WOT'd the car for more than 5 seconds since it's still under 600 miles, but when 600 miles is up I'm gonna see what this sucker has all in it! The low rpm lag is getting annoying, more like under 2750rpms, I know its going to lag some but it really kicks!! I'm gonna take it in soon and see if it needs the flash.
 
Mazda3 said:
You guys understand that it is a different turbo in the CX-7 right?

By the way I PMed you last week and didn't get a reply.


Well, we're still trying to figure that out. We can't find much definitive literature on the CX7 turbo, so we're just going by what the magazines and press releases say, which isn't a huge help. It sounds like the turbos are in fact the same in all of the vehicles, but the inlet to the exhaust housing is restricted in some way to increase exhaust velocity at low RPM's. This is of course unless you guys know something we don't (I'm not being facetious when I say that). If you guys know where the restriction is for sure then we're all ears. But until then we need to get a CX7 in here and take it apart too find out for sure.

I just went and checked my PM's and sure enough I skipped right over your PM. So sorry about that!! I'll resopnd to that right away...


HeavyH20 said:
I think they know, they are just trying to figure out why the boost drops so much at higher RPM's versus the MS versions. According to Mazda, "The refined area of the turbine inlet port enhances throttle response at low rpm and diminishes boost lag." Might also be the problem at higher engine revs.


Exactly, it isn't clear yet if the turbo is different, or if the manifold is different. I think the only way we're going to know for sure is to take a CX7 apart (unfortunately).


Mazdaspeedgirl said:
Thank you for that bit of info. I did not know regardless of searching. How about what size the turbo is? What kind?


Apparently the three vehicles (the CX7, SPEED3, and SPEED6) all have a Hitachi-Warner modified K04. But maybe someone on this forum knows something we don't and can shed light on this subject?


shadow1 said:
The throttle position drops off towards redline. Assuming the pedal is floored the whole way, then the ECU is pulling back on the e-throttle. The answer may be tuning the ECU control of the throttle.


Actually the boost begins to taper off well before the throttle does anything weird. For instance, here's a graph of the SPEED3 when we had ours on the dyno:

169883.jpg


If you compare this to the CX7 graph I posted, you'll see that the boost tapers off (~4250rpm) well before the throttle begins to close (~5500rpm). So you're absolutely right in that we do need to get control over the throttle. But the boost taper issue in the case of the CX7 is probably more related to the exhaust system than the throttle plate. On the SPEED3 however, the throttle is the only boost limitation.


shadow1 said:
A MBC is so easy to install, I'm surprised CPE or someone else hasn't tried it yet. One would need to install a good boost gauge 1st. Also, air fuel should be monitored, since I'm not certain that the fuel system will accommodate additional boost at high rpm.


SuperStretch18 has it right. Our Standback is a boost controller, in fact it's one of the most advanced boost controllers on the market. It uses a PID feedback loop to constantly calculate and control the deviation from your boost setpoint as opposed to a static duty cycle above or below stock. You literally just type in a boost pressure, and that's the pressure you'll get as long as the turbo can handle it. The reason why I posted the datalog of the CX7 was to show that our Standback is closing the wastegate and boost still doesn't increase. So really any boost controller you use will run into this issue unfortunately.

This all doesn't mean that there isn't anything to gain from the engine management. If the restriction is in fact in the manifold and not the turbo, then we can still turn the boost up and tune the car. We have the ability to tune the air/fuel ratio as well as the ignition timing, so even if we can't increase boost too much over stock, we still may be able to eek a decent amount of power out of this car. That is at least until we figure out what's going on with the boost issue.


Jordan
 
benben84 said:
I hope this gets figured out very soon! I haven't WOT'd the car for more than 5 seconds since it's still under 600 miles, but when 600 miles is up I'm gonna see what this sucker has all in it! The low rpm lag is getting annoying, more like under 2750rpms, I know its going to lag some but it really kicks!! I'm gonna take it in soon and see if it needs the flash.

Still braking the engine?
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS
How To Break In Your Engine For
More Power & Less Wear !
(boom08)
 
Hmm, maybe I will have to set aside some time on a weekend to pull the turbo and takes some pics of the inlet. I wonder if it is some type of flange/venturi that is simply madifying the inlet or if it is a wholesale change to the turbo. Something to investigate.

As for the break-in, I always followed the rule of thumb, break it in like you are going to drive it at 10, 20 or 50K. So, if you are going to drive it hard, break it in hard.
 
Mazda3 said:
Jordan,

Check your CPE e-mail for the CX-7 info I sent.
Hey, how come CPE only gets the info?!?(hi)

Model number for the CX-7 turbo would be much appreciated...:)
 
Mazda3 said:
Jordan,

Check your CPE e-mail for the CX-7 info I sent.


10-4 Scott.


HeavyH20 said:
Hmm, maybe I will have to set aside some time on a weekend to pull the turbo and takes some pics of the inlet. I wonder if it is some type of flange/venturi that is simply madifying the inlet or if it is a wholesale change to the turbo. Something to investigate.

As for the break-in, I always followed the rule of thumb, break it in like you are going to drive it at 10, 20 or 50K. So, if you are going to drive it hard, break it in hard.


That'd be great! We've had our SPEED6 manifold off a few times and it's not a fun project. But if you do decide to take yours off one day we'd be very interested in some pictures. I don't know when we'll have time to get to it, but if you could do it for us then we'd be that much closer to a solution for you guys.

God I love the internet, hah (kiss)


Jordan
 

New Threads and Articles

Back