Aggressive fitment anyone?!

I have about .100" clearance from my coilover and the tire in the rear. This is a meaty ass tire very close to the profile of a 235 and very soft so there is quite a bit of tire flex.
 
I have about .100" clearance from my coilover and the tire in the rear. This is a meaty ass tire very close to the profile of a 235 and very soft so there is quite a bit of tire flex.

Gotcha, That makes sense.

wagon, Idk why you hate. Excuse me having a valid question. (rolleyes)
 
I know borbet makes 16x9's. Im pretty sure the offset is to agressive to run on a protege. 3 or 2 piece wheels might be your best bet. Check vrwheels, might be your best option.
 
Gotcha, That makes sense.

wagon, Idk why you hate. Excuse me having a valid question. (rolleyes)

your question is like saying: Why do it right when theres a hack job way instead?

If it wasn't a "style" you were into, you'd call it ricer.. just sayin

i dont even know why he's in this thread lol

Because the thread title doesn't read: "Hellaflush" and I'd say the widest tire run on anything short of a track car is qualification enough for me.
 
do it right? theres no right and wrong with this, he couldnt add camber because the tire is so fat, so he rolled the fender
either way works, and how is adding camber ricer? 1 or 2 degree's is hardly noticable

and who said the title read hellaflush? lol you sure do assume alot
 
clapping.gif

EDIT: not directed toward protege03ak46 :)
 
I actually do agree with wagon. Anymore, the only fitment that qualifies as aggressive is flush or damn close to it.
 
not sure how I feel about the above statement, because I don't comprehend the intended message

People misconstrue flush with agressive. Flush is sometimes aggressive but hellaflush is sometimes ridiculous. People don't see wide meaty tires and wide stanced offset as aggressive, when it really is
 

New Threads and Articles

Back