See my preceding post about the AWD.
As for the numbers on the MS6, 280 ft-lbs of TQ and ~274 hp (in a recent article this translated to 256 whp) vs the Legacy GTs 250 hp (at the wheel?).
As for the experience with AWD, the MPV has had it for ages and as for AWD turbo cars, you need only look as far as the late 80's Mazda 323/Ford Laser KE TX3 4WD to understand Mazda's experience with AWD turbo vehicles. This vehicle ate Audi's and Subi's alike and was built ONLY to fulfill homologation rules for rally vehicle production. While Mazda hasn't produced a lot of AWD vehicles recently, they do know what they are talking about when it comes to AWD turbo vehicles.
LOL.....besides BackDoc, as a soon-to-be-Orthopod (July 2006), I need to establish a link with you now. Now if you are a chiro then we have to start our antagonism of each other now. Otherwise, if you are a spine orthopod....why....why would you submit yourself to that punishment....LOL! JK.
R
As for the numbers on the MS6, 280 ft-lbs of TQ and ~274 hp (in a recent article this translated to 256 whp) vs the Legacy GTs 250 hp (at the wheel?).
As for the experience with AWD, the MPV has had it for ages and as for AWD turbo cars, you need only look as far as the late 80's Mazda 323/Ford Laser KE TX3 4WD to understand Mazda's experience with AWD turbo vehicles. This vehicle ate Audi's and Subi's alike and was built ONLY to fulfill homologation rules for rally vehicle production. While Mazda hasn't produced a lot of AWD vehicles recently, they do know what they are talking about when it comes to AWD turbo vehicles.
LOL.....besides BackDoc, as a soon-to-be-Orthopod (July 2006), I need to establish a link with you now. Now if you are a chiro then we have to start our antagonism of each other now. Otherwise, if you are a spine orthopod....why....why would you submit yourself to that punishment....LOL! JK.
R
BackDoc said:
