Ok...so basically on this forum if you say something bad about the rondo that automatically means you are biased? Seems like anyone that says something bad about the rondo basically gets attacked? If i had looked at the rondo and then the 5 when i was looking i still would have taken the 5. I had a rondo as a rental for a week and did a good bit of driving so i have some good first hand experience. I thought the interior was decent...i actually thought it felt roomier...except for the thought of putting more than 4 people in it. At that point the 5 was better...I also found the dash a bit dated and odd. Gas mileage was pretty low. Not sure exactly what but seemed quite a bit less than our 5. Our five also handled better and had a better ride. To be honest i know that i would have a really hard time Owning a kia. I work on cars and know they are honestly crap. Even if they have gotten better, Resale is still pretty bad. Ok there...i said it. LOL. Want me to say something bad about the 5? the carpet sucks, lack of armrest in the front is lame, dash is hard to clean.
I guess someone doesn't understand LOL or smiley faces.
The last post was TOTALLY in jest.
Wow you felt attacked... boy my sarcasm is pretty powerful stuff!!!
..... Just in case you feel offended by that... again I was just kidding.
But in all seriousness... saying something bad about the Rondo is one thing... but at least make it objective (actually your post was one of the more objective ones!) Read some of the Rondo reviews in THIS forum and then read some of the Rondo reviews from places like Edmunds, cars.com, Motortrend, etc... Honestly I think the latter is a bit more objective than we are... wouldn't you agree?