From what I know, the performance difference is centered around the fact that your intercooler is being used to cool air, and a TMIC is sitting ontop of your engine. Not sure about you, but last time I checked, my engine bay is pretty friggen hot. Also, idk about this so correct me if I'm wrong, but when I look at the intercooler housing on the top of the hood, I don't see anyplace for the air to go once it's entered.. seems kind of like a bad design to me. Can anyone shed some light onto our intercooler ducting design?
Of course you can get into the argument that if it's a TMIC, the air has less time to travel less, and so you spool faster.
But you could also say that if it's a FMIC, the air has more time to travel, and thus would compress more and give you more power.
Overall, I believe -- that is, in my opinion -- that FMIC's are better. Perhaps not by much, but they're better.
I've heard that the ETS TMIC stays real cool, like ice, even after hard driving. If that's the case, it's a large improvement over stock.
and OP, what were you saying about tweezers? were the fins bent or something when you got it?
Post pics!
lol
ok here are the FACTS:
1. yes, top mount intercoolers do suffer from heat soak, which is not as much of a problem for front mounts.
2. the air goes through the intercooler. I'm not sure how you're not seeing an exit.
3. the farther that air has to travel, the less pressure is maintained. I could go into a fluid dynamics discussion, or you could just take my word for it.
4. No intercooler on the market (excepting of course liquid to air intercoolers filled with ice water) will be "cold as ice" after running. intercoolers are cooled by AMBIENT air, which means that they will never be colder than the air temperature of the outside air, and since the turbo is trying to heat it up, it'll never even get that cold.