interesting idea. I hear the apexis are dryflow. I had thought about going with an AEM filter.
I will look into it.
I've been on the phone with Cobb and Apexi for part of the day, getting numbers, looking at possibilities... If anybody out there has an idea, let me know. As it stands, the Cobb intake filter element is 4.5 inches, or 114.3 mm, in diameter. Apexi doesn't make a filter or flange to marry up to such a large opening, the largest they accomodate is about 80mm, with a 160mm filter that goes down to an 85mm opening... If I'd actually ever SEEN an Apexi power filter and not just gotten the press shots on google I may have more ideas... A rigging/tubing of /some/ kind could accomodate the Cobb MAF housing inlet, but would it be worth it, would it still be efficient with more tubing and some random modification to attach it? Hmm.
Doesn't the stock "coiled" rubber house create turbulance, thus reducing flow?
I would think Mazda uses it for mass production reasons as opposed to performance.
Probably makes only 0.0009% difference on the dyno. Anyone check Cobb versus BEGi Version?
What about rain? Does the Cobb get soaked when it rains?
Does the Apexi filter fit on the HKS or BEGi SRI?
I think the Apexi filter is suppose to be very high flow, zero maintenance, and a superior filter ta-boot (meaning it removes more dirt).i just ordered my cobb intake, what benefits are you looking for in changing the filter?
you wouldn't be saying that if you lived around here, the flash floods from super heavy sudden rains has caused more than enough hydrolocked engines.hydrolock is an urban legend..... i have never once seen it happen on the street and only saw one jeep w/ a factory intake suck up some what off-road