Skip the factory Nav

tealeaf

Member
Apologies if this is repetitive for some on this board but here's a new voice to add to the mix.

Here are 8 reasons to Skip the factory Nav. There are probably more. Feel free to add to this list if you're as disappointed as I am.

1. It's not intuitive. I'm not the only one saying this - most car reviews say the same thing. I know, you're probably saying "I'll get used to it." And maybe you will. But there are things that are just in the wrong place or deep in a submenu that should be on the main screen. Here's an example: setting the "Home" location. Good luck.

2. The Bluetooth integration is half-finished. Answering and ending a call interrupts the audio appropriately, and there's a display for signal and batt strength, but there's no phonebook download, voice commands for the phone book, etc. BASIC - but it doesn't do it. You have to record names for each of the folks in your phone. Looks like Mazda cut corners on this to allow for the same Bluetooth module for models sans Navigation. Shame, because the nav unit has a phonebook but it is not integrated nor accessible.

3. iPod integration is terrible and slow. There is no way (at least that I can tell) to jump through long lists. The iPod allows you to navigate a list of artists or albums by letter (so does Ford's Sync and countless other basic iPod interfaces). Not on the Mazda5 Nav unit. You have to page down dozens of times - just to get to the letter "F". You're left to create playlists.

4. Voice command is WEAK. There are some basic commands, but it looks like the OEM or Mazda engineers stopped after a few sips of coffee.

5. Good luck integrating iPod with Sirius. I was fortunate to have a persistent dealer that pestered corporate until it got an answer, but many haven't been so lucky.

6. No integration with a Rear Seat Entertainment system. Yep, Mazda's dealer-installed unit uses FM modulation. Nice, huh? In previous vehicles (Subaru as a recent example), the rear seat DVD played through the Nav display while the car was in park. Audio also played through the system natively, but could be switched to another source if the passengers were using wireless headphones. Now we have static to go along with the DVD play.

7. Update discs are few and far between. Our "brand new" 2010 unit that was manufactured in Feb 2010 has a disc dated 2008. There are numerous streets that just plain aren't there. Can anyone point me to a 2010 disc? An hour of Google searches only yielded people in the same boat as me - stuck without an oar.

8. No traffic integration. So basic. My 3 year old $200 Garmin unit has it. Apparently that's too advanced for the $2,000 Mazda unit.

It's obvious this unit was adapted to the M5 rather than made for it. More proof beyond the weak bluetooth integration? There's a duplicate clock (you know, an extra to the one that's a few inches above the Nav unit), that's on by default. Burrow into that sweet menu system to turn it off.

The ONLY reason I can tell to stay with the factory unit is keeping the steering wheel controls and the crappy bluetooth integration.

But lately, there are systems and knowledgeable stereo shops that can integrate with those without a hitch.

Good luck. And here's to the 2011 making up for the sins of the stereo/nav unit on its predecessor. But you have to live with those gawdawful doors.
 
Last edited:
Keep the Factory NAV, because it is cool looking. Then buy a PND (portable navigation devices) for the actual navigation use.

I have a Tomtom 930 PND. Most useful feature is I can take it with me during stop overs. Check POIs, create routes.. etc.. while 'off-vehicle'.

There are forums for PNDs where people share information just like we do here.
might be worth a visit to find out what we are missing with our Factory Navs.

http://www.tomtomforums.com for example.
 
So you spend $2k on a Nav unit - to "look cool", then top it off with the hassle of a $200-$300 Nav unit? RIGHT.

I've had two portable navigation units ripped off, both in "safe" areas.

One was in the driveway of our home in Irvine, California - ranked one of the safest cities in the US.

It's not so much the loss of the portable Nav, it's the hassle of cleaning up and replacing a broken window (you'll be finding glass bits for months), then getting it re-tinted. Oh, and if your insurance deductible is $500 or more, forget it - it's just below that level so MORE MONEY out of pocket.

And the "lockout" feature doesn't get your Nav back. So you have to put it under a seat, etc., every time you stop, then pull it out every time you start.

Another bonus is the wire hanging down, along with the now occupied 12v socket, plus the clumsiness of having it on your dash (suction cups lose effectiveness in the heat, bean bag mounts slide on hard turns).

Yeah, NO THANKS on the portable Nav. Been there, done that. I keep mine in the trunk of the other car as a "just in case" I'm lost.
 
Last edited:
I'm OK with the nav features, but the bluetooth is just useless. We tried, like fools, to figure out how to allow people to hear us and finally gave up. Neither drivers use the bluetooth. Total waste.

I never did find out how to integrate the iPod with Sirius. is it possible?
 
Mine said the same. I ignored him and am glad I did. For the $2000 it cost, I still have $1900 in resale added to the car.

Yeah, that thing is so cool, it requires a TomTom on top. SWEET (nana)

I'd rather have the $2k in my pocket than blue blook funny money. Resale is only good if another sucker will pay you the $1.9k.
 
Yeah, that thing is so cool, it requires a TomTom on top. SWEET (nana)

I'd rather have the $2k in my pocket than blue blook funny money. Resale is only good if another sucker will pay you the $1.9k.

I really don't know what your problem is with the nav unit. That said, I also don't like your attitude. Go b**** somewhere else because nobody cares how pissed off you are at your car, or yourself. You're just trolling for sympathy.
 
Mine said the same. I ignored him and am glad I did. For the $2000 it cost, I still have $1900 in resale added to the car.

You make a good point if this is not planned as a long term car.

I plan on keeping ours for a while so the extra $2k was not worth it in our case.
I would go with an aftermarket Pioneer or Kenwood unit instead.
 
I really don't know what your problem is with the nav unit. That said, I also don't like your attitude. Go b**** somewhere else because nobody cares how pissed off you are at your car, or yourself. You're just trolling for sympathy.

I've only stated objective facts (or as it relates to the efficacy of the Nav, my opinion, backed up by auto review consensus). The fact that some have paired theirs with a TomTom only lends more credibility to my position.

If it helps just one person avoid paying $2k (or at least spend a bit more time with the car before they buy, as I wish I did), then the post is a hell of a lot more productive than most.

I love this car. The Nav is a let down.
 
There will always be better aftermarket audio / navigation solutions, car companies move too slowly on changes. Take a look at the factory DVD player, costs twice as much as a better quality Alpine.

Anyway, with the navigation you can get a better aftermarket Alpine or Kenwood for around $1,000. You want to talk about way cool, look at this:
http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_500INAW900/Alpine-INA-W900.html?tp=20212

though I think that if a person wants navigation that they should buy the $200 or $300 portable unit and just keep it in the glovebox when parked. The only advantage to having the overpriced, inferior factory navigation is that you can roll it into the price of your Mazda5 and finance it over five years. That is, you don't have to come up with the money right away.

Personally, I just keep a folded up state highway map to get where I need to go.

And Tealeaf, I liked your post. It was well-written and does point out the flaws with the factory navigation. If somebody reads it and still wants factory navigation - so be it, but they can make an informed decision.
 
Last edited:
So far it's worked fine every single time for me. It's just not a big deal to me at all. But of course, I used it on the test drive so there were no surprises, other than the junk bluetooth.
 
Personally, I just keep a folded up state highway map to get where I need to go.
+1!

The only time I want GPS is when I'm driving in a strange area and don't know the roads.

I have a friend who drives around with his NAV on all the time, like he needs instructions to go to and from work.
 
I'm going to go redneck and velcro my blackberry storm in the big blank space between the audio control knobs. the GPS on that works fine!
 
I'd rather get an aftermarket removable faceplate NAV unit. Kenwood uses Garmin.
 
Back