oh the APS turbo is going to be much more efficient. I would expect about the same top end if not more, but boost would come on much quicker because of the use of ball-bearings. Most people think ball-bearing turbos are overrated. But those same people think turbo response is mainly just when you can reach max boost and at what RPM. Which is true, but only half of the equation. I try to think turbo response is how long it takes to get back into boost between shifts or letting your foot off the gas...that is when the ball-bearing turbo will show its advantage by slowing down less and therefore boost quicker. That is also when you are paying $1,500++ compared to $600+. If the VF22 kit is decently priced i would jump on that, you certainly will not be disappointed and you can always upgrade the turbo further down the road...or throw some alchy in the mix, retune and up the boost.LOL, thanks. I know about the VF22 but I was just curious as to a side by side comparison between it and the SR30 in pictures mostly. It seems to me that the SR30 is more efficient looking at compressor maps and such. I have seen some people say that it has better response as well as equal or better top end compared to the VF22.
It's not for sale. I will probably hold on to this car for some time. It has a lot of miles on the clock so ill end up building up a 2.5 or possibly an Axis Power block. Dedicate it as a track car and pick up a 2004 BMW 530i (thats the planHow much do you plan on getting for the wrx? If your selling it.
Did he take some astro glide with him? Mach V is way over priced.GrownUp said:thanks for the comments guys. The car is pretty quick but honestly now that im so used to the power...its slow again.
And now i feel really slow after just learning my friend with a Evo VIII just purchased a GT30R turbo and is going to get tuned at Mach V this weekend (wow). He's hoping for 380-400awhp.