Yeah, 5psi on a smaller turbo. He had what, a 16G? That's smaller than a T3, right?Bigg Tim said:Not to say that Terry's 253whp is a joke, but he dynoed at 5 more psi then me,
Well, this shouldn't be an advantage according to you.with a standalone,
So what? That's how it works. IIRC, before he put the race gas in, Dean only made 20 or 30 more whp than I did. And I had a fuel cut. He also ran more PSI, he had a custom rebuilt turbo by MPNick, he had head work, a ported intake and exhaust mani, a better intercooler, an 80mm MAF, and tons of other tweaks. So all of his tweaks, head work, etc only gave him a ~13% gain over someone without most of the same tweaks, who had just gotten his motor running, was barely tuned, and could not rev past 5K RPM. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with that, I'm just pointing out the irony here. You guys looked at Dean and Nick like gods that day, but in reality he wasn't any more successful over cars like mine and Terry's as we were over yours.and only made 25 more whp.
If you feel that you're such a good tuner that you have your stuff all together right, then why not turn up the boost to 13psi like Terry did and see if you can beat his number? After all, he did so on a stock motor.
Which is a BIG factor...I understand the clutch was slipping,
Why doesn't it impress you? He was the first to get that kind of power out of our cars, especially on a stock motor.but that isn't that impressing now that there are more and more high powered cars out there.
Then why did you go with a big turbo? Regardless, you're still pushing more CFM per PSI through your T3/T4 than Terry did with his 16g.I would expect a standalone, with all the talk about them, to be a much better performing system and put down more power. I may have a larger turbo, but I'm not even in it's efficiency range yet, so that's no reason to use.