If the torque figure I quote before for your version is about right then that's the figure of our previous model which did 0-62mph in 9.08 seconds
Subscribed, and/but waiting for news. As a TDI owner, I've never thought it was about a 0-60, somewhat the MPB, instead more the improved daily drivability from the torque (given, at high altitude).
Subscribed, and/but waiting for news. As a TDI owner, I've never thought it was about a 0-60, somewhat the MPG, but more the improved daily drivability from the very wide torque (at high altitude).
Mazda 3 has to be the most poorly thought out Mazda in the entire lineup including all cars we never get CX4 and CX8. Its lightweight but the 2.5 seems better in my CX5 the way its tuned. MPG is barely better or same than a Mazda6 (which is bad with the 2.5). Rear seat is practically useless unless you are small. Its sad that even Europeans with their twisties are not liking the 3. It has the worst quality interior now that CX3 trumps it as well. I really wanted to like it - but my CX5 is more rev happy and eager to drop the hammer than the 3 I drove.
Of all Mazda's I would say Gen 1 CX5 with 2.5 has the best setup wrt to driving and low end torque.
Not sure how newsworthy this is but figgered I throw it here- the '19 9er is live on mazdausa and AA/ACP are on the menu looks like Touring and above. Not the '19 I was hoping for but its something. BTW- wtf can I still build the 2017 3 and CX-5??
Purely for interest, just a few images of our latest incarnation taken today at a dealer.
The Adblue filler neck;
This is standard to the US but until now a 800 (approx $1100) option for us - radar cruise is at last standard;
Very nice 19* wheels;
Tell tale signs of an Adblue tank. The single tail pipe and blanking plug to the left;
The aluminium inlet to the variable nozzle twin turbo pack;
No front camera for 360 view monitor under MRCC Mazda badge.....
Yes link works. Silly that it's still an option on top spec model