To badge or to debadge...

Which rear badging do you prefer?

  • Stock

    Votes: 5 41.7%
  • Debadged

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • Mazdaspeed badge

    Votes: 1 8.3%

  • Total voters
    12

sac02

Member
:
2013 Mazda5 Sport 6MT
Not my car, not even my color. Just a pic I pulled from autoblog and modified.

(this question is specific to my car, with the turbo installed. not a general question for all mz5's.)

xkm1eIb.jpg


roAyUda.jpg


W2ct2aJ.png
 
Last edited:
I'm shocked to hear that there might be holes! I would have bet money it was just a flat adhesive badge.
 
There are no holes for the Mazda5 badge. Mine is debadged, I think it looks cleaner.

Let me clarify this even further. The first generation does have alignment holes for the Mazda badge but not for the 5 badge. The second generation does not have any alignment holes for either the Mazda or 5 badge.
 
Hadn't considered the Premacy option. That's a good option, I'm not sure why but it just doesn't appeal to me much though.
 
Let me clarify this even further. The first generation does have alignment holes for the Mazda badge but not for the 5 badge. The second generation does not have any alignment holes for either the Mazda or 5 badge.

That might explain why my 1st gen was half debadged by the previous owner. It still has the Mazda but no 5. I planned to remove the Mazda but I guess it is not an option anymore.
 
What about going all the way and removing the Mazda round logo above the license plate?
 
Iirc there are two alignment holes when I took the badge off. Its just double sided sticky tape.
 
Based on the shape/geometry of the Mazda emblem badge (basically just a circle), I would expect that one would have alignment holes. It would be more difficult to have a jig capable to easily place that badge properly. A long thin badge like the nameplate is much easier to use a jig to set the badge correctly.
 
Back