There appear to be a number of people disagreeing with you. Does this tell you anything?
No, it tells me nothing! Its always the same 2-3 ppl.
Last edited:
There appear to be a number of people disagreeing with you. Does this tell you anything?
lol ,i burn Cobalt SS's all the time.. they had one come next to me and i drop from 3 to 2nd and burned him bad by about 5 cars, he caught up at light and was like wow, that thing is quick. Then he went on to explain to me that his was still stock so.. i looked over and said.. mine is too.... man he didnt like that .. lol..
the new turbo cobalt claimed 14.0 quarter mile and 5.7 0-60. car weigh 2900 pounds or so. i think the only reason the car is getting the extra .1 on the times is because it has the "no lift s***" feature and 2step launch. plus the 200lbs less
i saw 2900, http://youtube.com/watch?v=el8_PMf0Zak no launch controL? watch the video of the demonstration. also the video of the nurburgring track time shows the race driver WOT shifting the entire time. i think its safe to say their feature are fully functional. i also read that the new turbo cobalts are going to be pushing max psi of 21 and imho i think these motors will start popping once the boost gets turned up and people start modding without a rebuild
- ms3007, the most ive seen the ms3 rated was 14.1 1/4 and 5.8. i never saw anyone claim 5.3 in magazines so i duno what ur sources are.
You don't magazine race, so maybe you should shut up with numbers and get back to us when you've smoked a few at your uncle's farm.
You don't magazine race, so maybe you should shut up with numbers and get back to us when you've smoked a few at your uncle's farm.
who are u talking to?
so its 5.4 not 5.3 that u wrote
Magazine numbers are relevant when it's convenient to you, and meaningless when it's convenient to you. Could you at least try to be consistent? Please?Dude, you are becoming a real pain in the ass.
Magazine numbers are relevant when it's convenient to you, and meaningless when it's convenient to you. Could you at least try to be consistent? Please?
I gave you numbers (from a magazine) for a 40 - 120 roll, and you completely ignored them, but you're living off mag numbers right here in this thread. 4/10ths in a 1/4 is not "slightly quicker", if we had the Cobalt by 4/10ths when comparing the best runs you can find, you'd be all over how badly we'd "walk" the new SS/TC. I could have brought up the Motor Trend article comparing the G35 to the BMW 335 (and winning...!) but you'd just have ignored it. You are entirely inconsistent. I'd ignore it and you, but you're everywhere.Could you at least try to stop obsessing over me? Please? You're full of s*** anyway. - When you try to convince ppl that a G35 will walk a Mazdaspeed3 from a 3rd roll because it's got a slightly quicker 1/4 due to RWD and full power in 1st and 2nd gear you make yourself look kind of silly. Honestly man I'm really tired of your moronic behavior on the forum and so are countless other members. Just stop trying to stir up drama all the time and it'll be alright.