Installshield 2
Gothenburg Superiority
also forgot to mention...what Gen1 talked about comes into play when picking a compression ratio...generally, as long as adequate means of tuning are available, a higher compression ratio can be run with a lower rod ratio engine...mostly because of the small amounts of TDC dwell time...with less dwell time, and a very high compression ratio; you are squeezing a mixture of gasoline and air very tightly...igniting it...and then sitting on it; not allowing the piston to retreat back down the cylinder...some really funky thermodynamics come into play when you do that...and eventually the engine owner gets s*** thrown at him...(mostly the head bolts get stretched, or the head gasket gives in...or both)
But on the other hand lower rod ratio's tolerate higher compression ratio's because the whole "sitting on it" thing is avoided...it is safe to say that inherantly less power will be made with a given compression ratio than on a higher rod'd engine...But with 12.1:1 CR, I was making just under 190bhp...and I wouldn't be suprised that with the right tuning, an FS should be able to handle 13.1:1 or even a little more and keep it streetable...that may not be possible on the stock rods though...
But on the other hand lower rod ratio's tolerate higher compression ratio's because the whole "sitting on it" thing is avoided...it is safe to say that inherantly less power will be made with a given compression ratio than on a higher rod'd engine...But with 12.1:1 CR, I was making just under 190bhp...and I wouldn't be suprised that with the right tuning, an FS should be able to handle 13.1:1 or even a little more and keep it streetable...that may not be possible on the stock rods though...